Posted on 01/15/2007 4:48:07 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Here we go with this again....
That's right, he's the dad. They also found a large pile of empty beers gourds near the fire pit. Investigators theorize he was thumped for refusing to take out the garbage.
Possibly; suggesting; maybe. She loves me, she loves me not. Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL. Keep that up and you'll have to change your name to BenDead, lol.
Depends. You'd have to check for radial fractures and all sorts of other evidence of trauma.
The abstract for the 2003 article doesn't mention trauma so its more likely that the skull was damaged after death:
The 2002 discovery of a robust modern human mandible in the Petera cu Oase, southwestern Romania, provides evidence of early modern humans in the lower Danubian Corridor. Directly accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (14C)-dated to 34,000–36,000 14C years B.P., the Oase 1 mandible is the oldest definite early modern human specimen in Europe and provides perspectives on the emergence and evolution of early modern humans in the northwestern Old World. The moderately long Oase 1 mandible exhibits a prominent tuber symphyseos and overall proportions that place it close to earlier Upper Paleolithic European specimens. Its symmetrical mandibular incisure, medially placed condyle, small superior medial pterygoid tubercle, mesial mental foramen, and narrow corpus place it closer to early modern humans among Late Pleistocene humans. However, its cross-sectional symphyseal orientation is intermediate between late archaic and early modern humans, the ramus is exceptionally wide, and the molars become progressively larger distally with exceptionally large third molars. The molar crowns lack derived Neandertal features but are otherwise morphologically undiagnostic. However, it has unilateral mandibular foramen lingular bridging, an apparently derived Neandertal feature. It therefore presents a mosaic of archaic, early modern human and possibly Neandertal morphological features, emphasizing both the complex population dynamics of modern human dispersal into Europe and the subsequent morphological evolution of European early modern humans. Source
Genesis 6
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
Knock that off, Blam.
;]
Ya know, it's one thing being called a Neanderthal but now you're calling us Nephilim?
LOL!
"The sons of God saw that the daughters of men were fair; and they took wives for themselves from those who were pleasing to them."
Who were the sons of God that they should look upon the daughters of men? It seems as if this sentence is saying that they were not men. Then who were they?
Quite a lot could be interpreted from that sentence.
tooo damn funny...
I suspect that happened after the fact, when neolithic stoners modified the skull for use as a bong.
Dude Man.
I seem to remember similar stories from Greece before the flood, with the Titans and Gods warring. Where are those histories written?
I recently heard the explanation that makes the most sense to me by a theologian (I think it was Dr. R. C. Sproul)
He demonstrated they were not angels. He said the daughters of men were descendants of Cain while the sons of God were not. The mixture of Cain's nature with the other descendants was the precursor to the need for the flood.
I found his explanation fascinating and need to reflect on it more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.