Posted on 10/14/2007 9:20:42 AM PDT by blam
No. I just wasn’t clear as to what aspect of the article I was commenting about. See #6.
They should just shut up.
The last thing we need is a bunch of dad bern speculators.
ah...the Huastecs idea of the perfect woman
I can remember as a child growing up in the 50’s a fascination I had with reading paleontological books. The dinosaurs the “scientists” wrote about then no longer exist. New dinosaurs have emerged. Even the prehistoric men they re-created were from such minuscule fragments of bone as to qualify more for fraud than science. This is a field notorious for their acrobatics if not their science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt9wZmvo7Go
Maybe we perceived it differently. I wasn’t thinking about exceptions. I was thinking in terms of armies, societal structures, physical strength, and emotional predisposition. There have always been exceptions throughout history.
I wouldn think that, because they are an irrigated ag economy, the water from the stone headless women could be some sort of analogy. Perhaps two rivers into one, or two irrigated cultures into one. I would think that a lot of their spiritual expressions would be water and ag based.
I believe the Hopi developed as a matriachy because of their devlopment of established agriculture, rather than hunter-gathering. It is also true of the matriarchy of the various non-migratory Klamath River tribes, where property is established as family fishing spots, plots for basket making materials and acrorn gathering.
We have that book and it is hilarious. My children loved it when they were young.
I guess you are talking about the Brontosaurs, now called Apatosaurs. They still exist, but for reasons of biological classification they changed the name. This happens today with well known existing species.
When I was a kid the Panda Bears were considered a separate family of carnivores, along with the Lesser Pandas. These days they seem to group the Lesser Pandas with the Raccoon family, and consider Greater Pandas more closely related to other bears.
A powerful woman stands at the center of the carving, flanked by two smaller decapitated women. A stream of liquid flows from the headless women toward the woman in the center... The women on each side are thought to represent priestesses, and the liquid represents the life force, while the woman at the center represents Mother Earth; so the priestesses seem to be nurturing the Earth with their life force. The truth is, however, nobody knows for sure what these stones mean."...although it appears to mean that one woman has just cut off the heads of two other women, either a some sort of human sacrifice, or as a consequence of some kind of cat fight."
One thing is fairly certain -- because of the recurrence of the number 13, the monolith seems to be a lunar calendar of some sort. That's why it set the archaeological world abuzz with discussion when it was unveiled last November. It is believed to have been created around 600 B.C. -- 2,000 years before what was previously the oldest discovered calendar in the Americas, the Aztec Calendar, which dates to A.D. 1400.Huh? The Mayan calendar is now very well understood, and antedates the Aztec calendar.
The monolith seems to have been toppled from its original location, broken into pieces and covered with mud. Ahuja estimates the time period at about the same time that several coastal cities were flooded, probably by a tsunami-type surge, around 300 B.C.Catastrophism angle, nice touch! Thanks Blam.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. |
||
|
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
The women on each side are thought to represent priestesses, and the liquid represents the life force, while the woman at the center represents Mother Earth; so the priestesses seem to be nurturing the Earth with their life force.
What will future archaeologists say when the discover the fountain/sculpture of the little boy pissing from our current era?
There is a very good reason why all the civilizations in which women were the warriors are no longer around.
And the Mayan Long Count calendar was originally developed by the Olmecs -- the true Mesoamerican foundational culture. They date back to around 1800 B.C. although it's not known just when they developed the Long Count. The Aztecs were latecomers.
IIRC, they determined holiness of the objects because they were made of the most durable materials(?)
PS: It is true that our long after the fact or geographically remote attitudes make for convoluted interpretations of many artifacts.
Darn if I remember - I read it about thirty years ago...
The story of Bodica(sp) ends with her and her followers being slaughtered at the hands of a Roman force about a tenth or less the size of her army. I think this same Roman general was eventually called back to Rome because they felt his actions against the Britons was a bit too heavy handed.
I remeber an old National Lampoon with something very similar, there was a skeleton in the bathtub with a showercap on the skull, which identified the skeleton as obviously coming from the priestly classes, or some such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
