Skip to comments.
Is a New Solar Cycle Beginning?
www.physorg.com ^
| 12/17/2007
| by Dr. Tony Phillips, Science@NASA
Posted on 12/18/2007 5:40:18 AM PST by Red Badger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Red Badger
Mine was a 97. A real luxury car that could turn in 25 miles per gallon, albeit in premium gas.
If I were doing the Aurora over again, I'd make it 1,000 pounds lighter and lower the CR to run on regular.
41
posted on
12/18/2007 6:28:44 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: Red Badger
Just Cogitating,
Why the mini ice age during the 50 years without sunspots?
From 1645 to 1705 sunspots were hardly observed. The resulting period, known as the Little Ice Age, left canals in the Netherlands frozen solid and forced people in Greenland to abandon their houses to glaciers.
There was still snow in July on the mountains of New York and New Hampshire.
There is some ‘splaining to do in a theory that says the sun’s output is constant.
42
posted on
12/18/2007 6:31:14 AM PST
by
Sundog
(Cheers.)
To: Red Badger
"
Beware of sudden outbursts of uncontrollable energy aimed in your direction......"
Precisely!
43
posted on
12/18/2007 6:31:30 AM PST
by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
To: Red Badger
And just to make sure it stayed dead, they killed off the entire Oldsmobile division...
44
posted on
12/18/2007 6:32:06 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Perdogg
Dude, 2012 is the Mayans’ Y2K. It’s simply the end of their calendar; it wasn’t made beyond that year. Although they had a highly accurate solar calendar they did not posess the knowledge to do further calculations so were stuck with an end date for their calendar. As fear would have it, the end of the calendar was interpreted by some as the ‘end of the world’. Unfortunately for the Mayans their world ended 500 years ago. Their calendar simply outlasted them.
45
posted on
12/18/2007 6:34:20 AM PST
by
Justa
(Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
To: Just mythoughts
To: Justa
So would that mean - although the calendar on my wall ends in two weeks the world won’t necessarily come to an end? What am I going to do with all food/fuel/ammo I have stored in the basement?
47
posted on
12/18/2007 6:49:19 AM PST
by
ruger9mm
To: Just mythoughts
''For more than a year, the sun has been experiencing a lull in activity, marking the end of Solar Cycle 23, which peaked with many furious storms in 2000--2003. "Solar minimum is upon us," he says.''
Could someone explain this count? What year did Solar Cycle 1 take place? "Year"? Try "years."
Given that a solar cycle is about 11 years and the 23rd just ended, that means Solar Cycle 1 began 23*11 or 253 years ago. 2007-253 would make that ca 1754. Not unreasonable to think solar observations might have begun by then.
(Wikipedia notes the cycle was discovered mid-1800s, but extrapolated back to the mid-1700s using earlier observations.)
48
posted on
12/18/2007 6:56:50 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Perdogg
ExACTly. Maybe it IS true.
Even the white buffalo has been born...hmm.
49
posted on
12/18/2007 7:00:11 AM PST
by
NordP
(Such tough choices ahead, I'm now a "middle of the road" voter--somewhere between RUSH & Savage ;-))
To: Perdogg
Isn’t 2012 the year that some ancient calendar maker decided...
wooo... my chisel hand is really tired, that should be enough for now.
50
posted on
12/18/2007 7:00:51 AM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Justa
I find it amusing I am not a moon-bat. Even the history channel had something on the Nostradamus-Mayan calendar link.
51
posted on
12/18/2007 7:01:29 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Fred Thompson for President)
To: ruger9mm
If you buy my book “The World Ends Next Month” there is an erasible date pad you can use to accurately set DOOM DAY. Your survival stocks will become fully appreciable for month-to-month peace of mind.
52
posted on
12/18/2007 7:02:49 AM PST
by
Justa
(Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
To: Red Badger
Many forecasters believe Solar Cycle 24 will be big and intense. Place your bets for SC24: "A number of well regarded solar physicists are predicting the next solar cycle will be far weaker than the last one."
Most interesting: "The Russian Academy of Sciences announced a paper predicting a Dalton-minimum style cooling because of extreme weakness in the predicted strengths of Solar Cycles 24 and 25. It looks like Greenhouse Theory and the Solar Cycle Theory are about to get their sternest tests."
Hmmm, we might want to be pumping more, not less, CO2 out. (OTOH, we can point to the cold weather as having overshot the mark and blame the Greenies...)
53
posted on
12/18/2007 7:03:44 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Red Badger
This a case of “old” news...the sun spots are a 11 year occurrence....nothing new here....
54
posted on
12/18/2007 7:14:33 AM PST
by
thinking
To: Ditter
[I dont have time to read this now,just tell me........ are we going to burn to a crisp or freeze to death?]
Yes!
55
posted on
12/18/2007 7:28:19 AM PST
by
dbacks
(Taglines for sale or rent.)
To: Red Badger
Do you feel this increase in magnetic activity will spur periods of volcanism/earthquakes here on earth?
56
posted on
12/18/2007 7:44:52 AM PST
by
quant5
To: buffyt
“And it looks just like the shopping lists for Y2K”
Yea, except this one is pretty well documented by the Bible, Osaphe, Mayans, Sumerians and a whole bunch of other sources.....
57
posted on
12/18/2007 7:48:03 AM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Red Badger
If it warms us up a bit, the left will crow “global warming”, and totally hide the fact that it’s caused by the sun doing a dance.
To: quant5
I don't feel, I think.................
59
posted on
12/18/2007 7:59:42 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: blam; Swordmaker; 75thOVI; AFPhys; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
60
posted on
12/18/2007 8:04:04 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Monday, December 10, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson