Posted on 12/21/2007 4:02:43 PM PST by blam
“So.....if this rock misses Mars, where is it off to next?”
(whistling past the graveyard)
Asteroid 2007 WD5 was first discovered on Nov. 20, 2007, by the NASA-funded Catalina Sky Survey and put on a “watch list” because its orbit passes near Earth.
Further observations from both the NASA-funded Spacewatch at Kitt Peak, Ariz., and the Magdalena Ridge Observatory in New Mexico gave scientists enough data to determine that the asteroid was not a danger to Earth, but could potentially impact Mars.
This makes it a member of an interesting class of small objects that are both near Earth objects and “Mars crossers.”
A search may turn up mp3s for free download.
Personally, I thought it dragged, but to each his own.
One good thing if it hits Mars: It will put the global warming hoax into perspective.
We would learn a LOT for if ever we have such a visitor. Pity we can't use this one for target practice.
I recently saw a show on one of the science/learning/history channels where they were debating evidence that chunks of Mars did hit the earth in just this way in the past (landing in Antartica, I vaguely remember).
If I remember correctly, they were even debating if the martian rock had microscopic fossils in it.
I was only half listening and don't remember the details. Anyone else see this show? In retrospect, I guess I should've listened more closely...
Shhhhh...you'll make Algore scream.
Lots and lots of heated arguments about that 'rock.'
Life on Mars: Possible Evidence in Meteorites
thanks, bfl
Why Antarctica and nowhere else?
Obviously a random number lands regularly everywhere, but only in the Antartcic ice do the black meteor rocks stand out against the white ice. Everywhere else, they land among rocks and plants and dirt and you can’t see them. Central Greenland is flat enough, but the ice crevasses and irregular surface hides them too well. Also, more people are available down south - middle of Greenland has no support bases handy.
Seems like the Arctic tundra would be a fertile ground for alien rocks (before the snow melts each year), but I’ve never heard of people collecting from up there.
Minor Martian global warming correction there. 8<)
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Hot Fudge Sunday.
Yes, that’s the rock they were talking about. Thanks for posting that.
AVP
spaceflightnow.com
NASA delays Mars Scout mission from 2011 to 2013
NASA NEWS RELEASE
Posted: December 21, 2007
WASHINGTON - NASA announced today that the next mission in the Mars Scout program, originally planned for launch in 2011, is now targeted for launch in 2013. The schedule slip is because of an organizational conflict of interest that was discovered in one of the mission proposal team’s Phase A Concept Study. This was the shortest delay for the mission possible because opportunities to send spacecraft to Mars occur only once every 26 months.
NASA will fund current proposals to meet a new launch date in 2013. Revised proposals will be due in August 2008, and the evaluation and selection will take place in December 2008.
(much more . . . )
If the asteroid hits, all the future Mars robots should be reconfigured to explore the new feature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.