Skip to comments.
Serbs Struggle to Understand Western Support for Kosovo Independence
Center for Peace in the Balkans ^
| Mar 5, 2008
| Ljiljana Smajlovic
Posted on 03/05/2008 4:08:54 PM PST by Bokababe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: eleni121
I thought this was a rather interesting bit of information.
I know its not related, but it shows how much and by whom we get our supply.
___________________________________________________________
December 2007 Import Highlights: March 3, 2008 Monthly data on the origins of crude oil imports in December 2007 has been released and it shows that two countries exported more than 1.50 million barrels per day to the United States. Including those countries, a total of five countries exported over 1.20 million barrels per day of crude oil to the United States (see table below). The top five exporting countries accounted for 73 percent of United States crude oil imports in December while the top ten sources accounted for approximately 88 percent of all U.S. crude oil imports. The top sources of US crude oil imports for December were Canada (1.784 million barrels per day), Saudi Arabia (1.675 million barrels per day), Venezuela (1.246 million barrels per day), Mexico (1.234 million barrels per day), and Nigeria (1.210 million barrels per day). The rest of the top ten sources, in order, were Angola (0.439 million barrels per day), Iraq (0.378 million barrels per day), Algeria (0.348 million barrels per day), Ecuador (0.195 million barrels per day), and Brazil (0.171 million barrels per day). Total crude oil imports averaged 9.823 million barrels per day in December, which is a decrease of 0.125 million barrels per day from November 2007.
Canada remained the largest exporter of total petroleum in November, exporting 2.360 million barrels per day to the United States, which is a decrease from last month (2.431 thousand barrels per day). The second largest exporter of total petroleum was Saudi Arabia with 1.686 million barrels per day.
Crude Oil Imports (Top 15 Countries) (Thousand Barrels per Day) |
Country |
Dec-07 |
Nov-07 |
YTD 2007 |
Dec-06 |
Jan - Dec 2006 |
|
CANADA |
1,784 |
1,919 |
1,864 |
1,830 |
1,802 |
SAUDI ARABIA |
1,675 |
1,530 |
1,453 |
1,471 |
1,423 |
VENEZUELA |
1,246 |
1,227 |
1,150 |
1,045 |
1,142 |
MEXICO |
1,234 |
1,484 |
1,410 |
1,245 |
1,577 |
NIGERIA |
1,210 |
1,245 |
1,082 |
1,010 |
1,037 |
ANGOLA |
439 |
408 |
496 |
610 |
513 |
IRAQ |
378 |
508 |
485 |
419 |
553 |
ALGERIA |
348 |
184 |
443 |
406 |
362 |
ECUADOR |
195 |
154 |
198 |
240 |
272 |
BRAZIL |
171 |
78 |
167 |
130 |
133 |
KUWAIT |
158 |
154 |
176 |
163 |
179 |
AZERBAIJAN |
134 |
77 |
57 |
68 |
27 |
LIBYA |
116 |
66 |
84 |
46 |
66 |
COLOMBIA |
113 |
197 |
137 |
74 |
141 |
UNITED KINGDOM |
93 |
42 |
102 |
93 |
130 |
|
Total Imports of Petroleum (Top 15 Countries) (Thousand Barrels per Day) |
Country |
Dec-07 |
Nov-07 |
YTD 2007 |
Dec-06 |
Jan - Dec 2006 |
|
CANADA |
2,360 |
2,431 |
2,426 |
2,461 |
2,353 |
SAUDI ARABIA |
1,686 |
1,620 |
1,489 |
1,491 |
1,463 |
VENEZUELA |
1,387 |
1,381 |
1,362 |
1,274 |
1,419 |
MEXICO |
1,322 |
1,581 |
1,533 |
1,366 |
1,705 |
NIGERIA |
1,271 |
1,306 |
1,132 |
1,068 |
1,114 |
ALGERIA |
600 |
447 |
670 |
662 |
657 |
ANGOLA |
439 |
415 |
507 |
620 |
534 |
VIRGIN ISLANDS |
387 |
414 |
346 |
334 |
328 |
IRAQ |
378 |
508 |
485 |
419 |
553 |
RUSSIA |
306 |
470 |
413 |
369 |
369 |
UNITED KINGDOM |
238 |
210 |
278 |
199 |
272 |
ECUADOR |
201 |
161 |
203 |
240 |
278 |
BRAZIL |
178 |
85 |
202 |
162 |
193 |
KUWAIT |
158 |
154 |
183 |
169 |
185 |
NETHERLANDS |
157 |
58 |
127 |
98 |
174 |
Note: The data in the tables above exclude oil imports into the U.S. territories.
|
21
posted on
03/05/2008 5:03:04 PM PST
by
ThreePuttinDude
()... Cevapi & Slivovitz for everyone....()
To: GAB-1955
The West gave the Sudetenland to Germany.
Czechoslovakia was not even invited to the talks. The Czechs were free to fight if they wished, but they had no support. They chose not to fight.
The rest is catastrophe...just like today.
The rest of your reasoning is bogus. Makes no sense at all..given that Poland was a communist state. The Polish people were our enemies as much the Russian people under the bolsheviks. Which means they were not.
22
posted on
03/05/2008 5:06:10 PM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: ThreePuttinDude
The OPEC cartel sets prices and production.
Here they are:
Algeria, Angola, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Ecuador
10 Muslim states and two terror supporting states and 2 failed states run by OPEC.
You knew that right?
23
posted on
03/05/2008 5:10:31 PM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: manc; Bokababe
Does this answer your question? The Albanian Mohammedans love him because he has our troops provide protection for them in Kosovo when they dynamite Orthodox Churches.
24
posted on
03/05/2008 5:11:31 PM PST
by
Kolokotronis
(Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
To: GAB-1955
The Austrians illegally annexed Bosnia. They didn't even live there but wanted to control the people - and especially oppress the Serbs and buttress the Muslim population as the Ottoman Empire weakened.
The Austrians dangled the Archduke (whom they didn't even like) on a purposely important Serbian holiday to provoke them and didn't supply him with protection (even though they had some of their army stationed in Sarajevo and had control of the Bosnian Muslim soldiers.)
The assassination team was mostly teenagers and included a Muslim. When one of them threw a grenade at his motorcade, they still didn't beef up security.
His car stopped 5 feet from Gavrilo Princip - which appeared the only way the inept, bumbling crew could do the job.
Once accomplished there were suddenly the thousands of soldiers and police on the streets to arrest him and then begin the hangings of civilian Serbs (including women) all around the locations where the Austrian army was stationed in Bosnia.
The Austrians wanted an excuse and German especially was keen on pushing them into a war and subsequently getting a jump on a war with Russia.
25
posted on
03/05/2008 5:11:34 PM PST
by
joan
To: ThreePuttinDude
And remember this (from wiks):
“On November 19, 2007, global oil prices reacted strongly as OPEC members spoke openly about potentially converting their cash reserves to the euro and away from the US dollar.”
We are being royally screwed.
26
posted on
03/05/2008 5:12:17 PM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: eleni121
We are being royally screwed. ...and we aren't even being royally kissed....just kissed off
27
posted on
03/05/2008 5:15:18 PM PST
by
ThreePuttinDude
()... Cevapi & Slivovitz for everyone....()
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: eleni121
No, the argument is not bogus. Alliances and nations change. Serbia in 1995 is not Serbia in 1914, and so forth.
29
posted on
03/05/2008 5:19:42 PM PST
by
GAB-1955
(Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
To: GAB-1955
"The driving force in the Balkans is still nationalism, not religion"Not sure how to be polite and still say that's utter crap.
Nationalism is steeped in a culture for a long time, and always emerges when it has an opportunity. German nationalism was hatched from an egg, that sense of German superiority and entitlement pre-dated Nazi Germany by centuries.
Serbia had a multitude of opportunities in the last 100 years to drive out all the Muslims (Bosnian and Albanians, both)in the Balkan wars and take what they wanted of Yugoslavia -- especially post-WWI. If they had, Croatia would have never had Dalmatia or the Krajina, and would have been confined to a small dot on the map. Serbia did none of that, but instead chose to share. That was their mistake. Because by the time, Tito came along, he made sure that Serbia stayed weak and small so that he could be the only glue holding Yugoslavia together.
If Serbs had been the raving nationalists you claim, they wouldn't be where they are today. The difference is that Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Albanians can all be hardcore nationalists and get called "freedom fighters" for it. Serbs, on the other hand, get called "hardcore nationalists" just for trying to preserve their sovereign borders and not cave in to globalist attempts to ravage them..
30
posted on
03/05/2008 5:29:07 PM PST
by
Bokababe
( http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: GAB-1955
And Kosovo is the most ethnically pure area in Europe, thanks to our support of the pogrom carried out against the Serb, Jew, and Roma residents of Kosovo by the Jihadist illegal immigrants.
Pure idiocy on the part of the West.
31
posted on
03/05/2008 5:34:56 PM PST
by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: GAB-1955
The real question is why would we possibly support Jihad in Kosovo?
32
posted on
03/05/2008 5:36:21 PM PST
by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: FormerLib
33
posted on
03/05/2008 5:37:14 PM PST
by
Bokababe
( http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: ThreePuttinDude
...and we aren't even being royally kissed....You didn't get your kiss yet?
34
posted on
03/05/2008 6:55:53 PM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
To: GAB-1955
Your changing scenario theory makes no sense. Unless we deliberately seek the destabilization of the region.
If so, we repeat mistakes of the past instead of learning from them.
Our beyond bizarrre and destructive interference in the Balkans has led not to a deflation of tensions but just the opposite. There are now two separate entities with Albanians and the clamor to join has begun...the Albanians in FYROM and Greece are next...A historical parallel is England let’s say supporting Nazi Germany in its demand for Sudetenland.
We are on the wrong side of history and we won’t even talk about being on the wrong side of morality.
35
posted on
03/05/2008 7:30:17 PM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: olezip
You talk like there is a difference between the Clinton administration and the Bush administration.
The only difference is rhetoric.
To: Bokababe
“Serbs Struggle to Understand Western Support for Kosovo Islamic Albanian Thugs Who Were First Recognized By Their Brethren the Taliban”
37
posted on
03/06/2008 5:52:49 AM PST
by
SQUID
To: ThreePuttinDude; All
UP to 105-106 today. No end in sight. OPEC refuses to increase production..and why should they?
They get everything they want from our govt without anything in return.
38
posted on
03/06/2008 7:05:23 AM PST
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: Bokababe
Americans who KNOW ANYTHING about Kosovo, Serbia, etc. struggle to understand why we are backing Kosovo’s Muhammadan savages and criminals.
Americans who only know what the MSM tells them like our Kosovo policy just fine, especially if they are of the liberal or neocon persuasion.
39
posted on
03/06/2008 7:24:13 AM PST
by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: ThreePuttinDude
40
posted on
03/06/2008 8:48:21 AM PST
by
tired1
(responsibility without authority is slavery!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson