Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prof Peter Higgs interview: Smashing atoms at CERN and the hunt for the 'God' particle
The Telegraph ^ | 4/8/2008 | Roger Highfield

Posted on 04/08/2008 6:06:11 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 04/08/2008 6:06:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

They won’t find a ‘god particle’ responsible for ‘helping endow matter with mass’ because they fundamentally misunderstand mass as being a property of matter rather than as an electrical property of space.


2 posted on 04/08/2008 6:27:37 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Didn’t Einstein mention this somewhere in his ramblings? ;-)


3 posted on 04/08/2008 6:34:14 PM PDT by doc1019 (God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

From the ‘questions I am really going to regret asking yet am unable to stop myself file’.

What does “electrical property of space” mean?


4 posted on 04/08/2008 6:35:59 PM PDT by tokenatheist (Can I play with madness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
If He want’s to see God's “particles” He can do what the weatherman does. Look out the window!
5 posted on 04/08/2008 6:36:40 PM PDT by reefdiver (The sheriff of Nottingham collected taxes on behalf of the common good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Higgs is searching for God-ons but he might find Hell-ons..


6 posted on 04/08/2008 6:42:29 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

???


7 posted on 04/08/2008 6:49:50 PM PDT by tokenatheist (Can I play with madness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tokenatheist
It means he has some type of pseudo-science in mind, for which I guarantee he has no equations that describe observed behavior of subatomic particles, or very badly understands the concept of Electro-Weak theory.

In any case, mass is a self-energy term in the Lagrangian describing the behavior of a quantum field. In current Electro-Weak theory the constant in front of this self-energy term has to be determined for each fermion field in the standard model based on observed experiments. In general, for Non-Abelian Gauge theory, though, the equations are much better behaved if the inherent mass of each field is 0. To get the inherent masses to be 0, we postulate a new field called the Higgs field and show that interaction with this field causes the fermion fields to appear as if they had inherent mass. This had to be assumed to get a sensible Electro-Weak theory, and was used in predicting the masses and coupling strengths of the W+, W- and Z particles before they were detected in accelerators.

Since assuming the existence of the Higgs field gave correct predictive results in earlier experiments, everyone thinks that it is extremely likely that it or something basically like it exists. However, there are a huge number of ways that you can get the Higgs effect with multiple fields as well as the simple one field model. So the exact details of what is going on are fairly murky. Exciting the Higgs field directly, instead of inferring the effect from lower energy experiments, is the only way to get more real knowledge of what is occurring.

In addition, all of the fields we know of, such as the electron field, photon field, etc. have values of 0 when no energy is present. The Higgs, however, is expected to have a non-zero value in the vacuum. By analogy, therefore, this piece of scientific knowledge would be on-par with the original discovery of barometric pressure or the first creation of a vacuum, which is a really big deal. If you think of discovering normal quantum fields as finding objects in a room, this is more like pulling aside a veil aside to reveal another room.

8 posted on 04/08/2008 7:00:48 PM PDT by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

All I have to say in response to your post is...

HUH????????


9 posted on 04/08/2008 7:09:37 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arkansas Toothpick

I was throwing down the gauntlet and daring him to debate me.

Basically, if you follow particle physics, the Higgs field is the big current “?”, therefore the answer should be a really big “!”.


10 posted on 04/08/2008 7:12:15 PM PDT by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

bump


11 posted on 04/08/2008 7:29:59 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

Exactly. What you said.


12 posted on 04/08/2008 7:45:35 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Veteran physicist hopes secret of universe lies underground
AFP via Yahoo! | 04/07/08 | Patrick Baert
Posted on Monday, April 07, 2008 12:18:54 PM by Brilliant
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1997962/posts


13 posted on 04/08/2008 8:36:47 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

I love it when they talk. It makes a shiver go up my leg.


14 posted on 04/08/2008 8:45:15 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

Seems to be a lot of that goin’ around.


15 posted on 04/08/2008 9:26:10 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

I heard Glenn Beck talking about this today. He said that scientists were pretty sure this wouldn’t turn the earth into a black hole or end the universe or anything. He said something to the effect “Pretty sure? Isn’t that something that you’d want to be really, really sure about?” Just sayin’.


16 posted on 04/08/2008 9:29:26 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

The good news is we will never know what hit us.


17 posted on 04/08/2008 9:37:56 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


18 posted on 04/08/2008 10:39:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_____________________Profile updated Saturday, March 29, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

These folks know they are working with more unknowns than they care to admit. Thus the reason for the lack of coverage and why most people have no clue what this project is dealing with. In 1941, the U.S. detonated it’s first nuclear explosion. In 2008 the World will detonate it’s first nuclear Implosion. Basically what this thing will do will be to pack as much energy released from the first atomic bomb into an area the size of an atom. In my opinion the research isn’t about finding a supposed particle of physics, which it may/may not do. The real purpose is to create and sustain black holes for further research. Obviously, the reward for controlling the power of a black hole will be immense. But so will be the demise if it escapes and lingers unstoppable. Yes, this research will be the precurser to Warp drive mechanics, matter replication and indeed the possibility to recreate new life forms altogether. Harnessing the powers of a black hole is beyond most peoples imagination I suspect.


19 posted on 04/09/2008 9:48:46 AM PDT by CheezyChesster (failed diplomacy: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY STUPID !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheezyChesster

In 2008 the World will detonate it’s first nuclear Implosion. [on this scale]


20 posted on 04/09/2008 10:03:41 AM PDT by CheezyChesster (failed diplomacy: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY STUPID !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson