Skip to comments.
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh
The Australian ^
| 23 April 2008
| Phil Chapman
Posted on 04/22/2008 11:27:56 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: snarks_when_bored
OMG! Global Warming!
41
posted on
04/22/2008 12:10:48 PM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: RipSawyer
I notice LESS hair growing on my head, what does that mean? Grass don't grow on a race-track. ;-)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Come to West Texas. We used to be forested.
43
posted on
04/22/2008 12:12:40 PM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: RipSawyer
Its migrated to other parts of your body.
44
posted on
04/22/2008 12:12:55 PM PDT
by
correctthought
(Hippies, want to change the world, but all they ever do is smoke pot and smell bad)
To: Spktyr
Don't worry, the New York Times, will switch Climate Change from Global Warming to Global Cooling (like in the 70s) any time now.
45
posted on
04/22/2008 12:13:25 PM PDT
by
sr4402
To: ClearBlueSky
People currently with beach front property will be a long way from shore.
46
posted on
04/22/2008 12:14:37 PM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: snarks_when_bored
All of recorded human history occurred during this interglacial cycle. During an ice age, major centers like London, New York and Chicago would be under the ice or so near as to be uninhabitable. A huge amount of arable land would be lost. It's unclear whether our civilization could survive that.
We know from archaeological digs that human life fled to refuges in Europe in southern Spain, Italy and Greece - no significant populations lived north of those. Canada would go under, but the U.S. would only lose New England and the Upper Midwest. 'Course, a lot of land to the south of the ice would become tundra.
If CO2 emissions have somehow managed to alter this almost 2 million year series of cycles that would be a very good thing indeed for the human race, but I personally don't believe it has.
47
posted on
04/22/2008 12:22:20 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
To: JoeSixPack1
We did the Ice Age thing back in the 60s. Still waiting.From the '60's to now is a spit in the ocean of geologic time. It may be time to invest in Costa Rican real estate or not. Who knows.
48
posted on
04/22/2008 12:22:22 PM PDT
by
NY.SS-Bar9
(DR #1692)
To: qam1
"Hansen & the boys at the NOAA still claimed March 2008 was the 2nd warmest month ever" That was 2007. March 2008 was .4 F below the 20th century mean (for March). Of course that is based on preliminary data, so Hansen still has time to add some corection algorithm to prove it's actually warming.
49
posted on
04/22/2008 12:23:26 PM PDT
by
ETCM
To: mtbopfuyn
“Sorry, but the world is too overcrowded as it is.”
You can put the entire world population in Alaska with plenty of space per person.
50
posted on
04/22/2008 12:26:49 PM PDT
by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
To: ETCS
Let's see,... concoct a crisis, provide cure for crisis, crisis ended ahead of schedule, proclaim self victorious.
Nothing wrong with that is there?
51
posted on
04/22/2008 12:30:59 PM PDT
by
Vercingetorixbc
(Veni, Vedi, Butti - I came, I saw, I kicked butt)
To: colorado tanker
“...but the U.S. would only lose New England and the Upper Midwest.”
And Alaska too.
To: snarks_when_bored
It's still Bush's fault. Bush and those damned SUVs.
Women and minorities will be hardest hit.
53
posted on
04/22/2008 12:37:46 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Alaska is an intriguing question. It appears that during the last ice age when the sea level was low a substantial part of what is called Beringia was free of ice, although ice blocked the exits south to North America. A population of what became Amerindians stayed there for some time before finding a path to go south.
54
posted on
04/22/2008 12:42:04 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
To: snarks_when_bored
55
posted on
04/22/2008 12:42:19 PM PDT
by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
To: AlexW
I wasted some time with a calculator and you can actually put the world’s population in the state of texas and give everyone 1134.96 square feet of space.(The average one bedroom apartment is about 750 sq feet)
56
posted on
04/22/2008 12:42:24 PM PDT
by
Boonie
To: ETCS
57
posted on
04/22/2008 12:44:02 PM PDT
by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: mtbopfuyn
I agree with you. The world is too crowded. Okay...you go first.
58
posted on
04/22/2008 12:44:33 PM PDT
by
4yearlurker
(I miss Ronnie!!!!!)
To: Myrddin
“The current food shortages are driven by high oil prices and silly use of biofuels.”
While true it is interesting how there was such a balance in these things until the government got involved.
59
posted on
04/22/2008 12:47:36 PM PDT
by
edcoil
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
As someone wrote on another thread; We don’t have periods in our planetary history recorded as the great Hot Ages. It’s always Ice Ages.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson