Posted on 08/25/2008 5:58:11 PM PDT by Raineygoodyear
Anent Global Climate Change: Is this a missing piece in the theory of cosmic/solar radiation affecting cloud formation & global temperature changes?
I know that the anthropogenic-only crowd deny the theory on grounds that actual solar output changes are too small in their book to account for it; but if a weakened field ia allowing more of radiation through....
So the consensus is, "your guess is as good as mine." How can it be Modern Science without Consensus? ;-)
This is a much greater problem than I thought - no FR? Woah!
The air temperature in my back yard has risen 30° in the past four hours. At this rate, I’m planning on smelting lead over this weekend.
But wait... large extrapolations based on short term data don’t work well for nonlinear, time variant systems do they?
Well look on the bright side; there wont be any DU.
Very good. My compliments.
I would not care for the collateral damage, but why leave out Pyongyang and Mecca.
Thanks, infrequent sniping seems to be my specialty.
*snort* I hoping that the next one will be called the "Al Gore Minimum", just to point up that fool's idiocy.
Good points; maybe throw in San Francisco to appease equal opportunity advocates.
Thanks for those links! They are great info...
Today it is better, yesterday it was Snail Mail...
Good point.
Global warming is a large extrapolation into the future.
Evolution is a large extrapolation into the past.
/chuckle/...as it turns out I'm currently reading Charles Hapgood's “The Path of the Poles”, which is a reprint of his original work from the 1960’s called: “Earth's Shifting Crust”. Hapgood's theory is that in Earth's history the lithosphere has in fact shifted many times, moving the points of the North and South poles around with it.
...interesting book, though a bit technical. Nevertheless, maybe I should start practicing walking on my hands!
I’ve read that there is plenty of geologic evidence of the magnetic pole moving about.
I'm not a Geologist by training so some of Hapgood's material goes over my head. However, the evidence that he has documented from his own, and other sources, is extensive. (Having to do with the various orientations of iron minerals in rocks that have been magnetized to point at different polar locations, etc).
I'm learning a lot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.