Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth may face freeze worse than Ice Age--study
alertnet.org ^

Posted on 11/12/2008 10:37:18 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Remember those SAT analogy tests?

Global warming is to inflation as

Ice age is to deflation.

Governments prefer inflation; its easier to deal with or pretend to deal with. Deflation, as we are seeing now, is a real chiller.

41 posted on 11/12/2008 12:04:05 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

No harmful effects that I know of from CO2, of course, you’re right. I was referring to the general trend toward associating concern for the environment with the climate change hucksters, and rejecting any attempts to cut down on pollution.
sort of tangential though. i should have been more clear.


42 posted on 11/12/2008 12:20:58 PM PST by LikeARock (Liberty or Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LikeARock
"There’s no reason to close the door on discussing what we put in the air just because the Left has pushed “global warming” on us."

Don't be silly. CO2 is harmless unless you get enough to dilute the oxygen below the life-sustaining point. And REAL pollutants in the air have gone down for decades. The "environmental protection" laws had done their work superbly. Most of what passes for "discussion" today is simply green propaganda pandering to eco-nutcases.

43 posted on 11/12/2008 12:22:30 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"ALL coal plants in the US are filtered and screened - there are NO harmfull items released. 8<)"

I'm afraid that just ain't so. Lots of things emitted, like mercury, for instance. Not sufficient reason to be against coal-fired power plants, as the levels are VERY low, but lets not have scientific falsehoods on the forum.

44 posted on 11/12/2008 12:25:54 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I predict that Earth is either going to get warmer, get colder or stay the same. Where’s my money?


45 posted on 11/12/2008 12:27:08 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Mr. Bill: "Oh NO! We are DOOMED!!!!"
46 posted on 11/12/2008 2:13:29 PM PST by GulfWar1Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

10,000 years?

8,000 BC:

Hunter-gatherers in Southeast Asia begin growing crops to supplement their food supply. In the Jordan Valley, a walled settlement exists at Jericho.

Present:

Space travel, nano-tech, nucleonics, carbon fibers

12,000 AD will be well able to cope utilizing technologies we can’t even concieve of...if there is anybody still using earth as anything other than a historical preserve or vacation spot.


47 posted on 11/12/2008 2:52:27 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmichaels1970; Constitution Day

Don’t forget the Twinkies! The desert of the ages!


48 posted on 11/12/2008 2:53:55 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LikeARock

Wealthy societies have the resources to spend on cleaning up their impact on the environment. Look at Russia and China in the 80’s and 90’s for proof.

Our wealth will be distributed in the future by our government making it less likely that we will care about environmental issues. When we are faced with doubling or tripling electric rates to meet the extreme levels of cleanliness that the environmentalists demand, people will look at their empty wallets and their very expensive food and they will choose a little pollution over starving every time.

Would you like the cleanest environment with the least visual impact with the highest quality air? Join the groups pushing to replace our coal plants with nuclear plants.


49 posted on 11/12/2008 3:07:44 PM PST by listenhillary (No representation without taxation! ~~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
Don’t forget the Twinkies!

Excellent point. Probably a good time to get some maps to the nearest Twinkie factory.
50 posted on 11/12/2008 5:45:23 PM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; BenLurkin; ...
Thanks LucyT for the link.
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

51 posted on 11/12/2008 6:08:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Caves reveal clues to UK weather
by Tom Heap
At Pooles Cavern in Derbyshire, it was discovered that the stalagmites grow faster in the winter months when it rains more. Alan Walker, who guides visitors through the caves, says the changes in rainfall are recorded in the stalactites and stalagmites like the growth rings in trees. Stalagmites from a number of caves have now been analysed by Dr Andy Baker at Newcastle University. After splitting and polishing the rock, he can measure its growth precisely and has built up a precipitation history going back thousands of years. His study suggests this autumn's rainfall is not at all unusual when looked at over such a timescale but is well within historic variations. He believes politicians find it expedient to blame a man-made change in our weather rather than addressing the complex scientific picture.
I like that closing sentence -- "future decision-making could be made based on scientific data and not on political expediency". I wouldn't count on it, but that would be great.
52 posted on 11/12/2008 6:11:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks LucyT.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


53 posted on 11/12/2008 6:13:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I do not intend to be living on Earth in 10,000 years.


54 posted on 11/12/2008 6:20:42 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Who wants to bet the earth is self correcting...


55 posted on 11/12/2008 6:31:10 PM PST by GOPJ (Election Day... liberals who had spent years praising McCain all voted for Obama - Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The ptarmigans would benefit from it.


56 posted on 11/12/2008 6:34:31 PM PST by Ptarmigan (God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81; SunkenCiv; All

“As little as 10,000 years.”

If you look at temperature charts for the last 400,000 to 800,000 years, it looks as if it could start a lot sooner than 10K years. Then again, given recent knowledge about the potential for asteroids, comets, etc. to crash into Earth creating major mess, we have no way of knowing exactly when anything is going to happen.

I also noticed that they referred to a drop in the ocean level of 900 ft with major glaciation. I thought that the maximum lowering of sea level at the end of the last Ice Age was around 400 ft. I don’t trust their figures.


57 posted on 11/12/2008 11:33:11 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama Superstar will save us. /sarc>


58 posted on 11/13/2008 7:22:36 AM PST by Nowhere Man (Is Barak HUSSEIN Obama an Anti-Christ? - B.O. Stinks! (Robert Riddle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

“Would you like the cleanest environment with the least visual impact with the highest quality air? Join the groups pushing to replace our coal plants with nuclear plants.”

I have. In fact, I just read a report (http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html) that said coal burning actually exposes the public to 100X the amount of radioactive material as nuclear power, which is interesting. That’s provided nothing goes wrong of course, but I think nuclear power is the lesser danger here personally.
I couldn’t find anything in my search yesterday afternoon regarding coal plant emissions as a whole though really, all anybody talks about is CO2. The report I linked does mention that particulate precipitators are 99.5% efficient in collecting ash, but I am not a scientist or anything and I don’t know if that covers all combustion emissions or what. I guess it can’t cover all gases, being particulate, so the Nitrogen and Sulphur Oxides wouldn’t be affected.
Anyway, nobody asked for that but I read it and there you go. I grew up in a valley outside L.A. where the pollution gets trapped by the mountains, and causes a huge amount of health problems in the young and infirm, so I guess I’m more concerned than some about these things.


59 posted on 11/13/2008 9:36:35 AM PST by LikeARock (Liberty or Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LikeARock
I can understand your concern growing up in that environment.

It IS time to be rid of the internal combustion engine for personal transportation. Battery packs could be made interchangeable so you don't have to worry about long distance travel and multi-hour charge times. You pull into a recharge station and your battery is swapped for a full one in minutes. If you are not traveling, you can recharge at home.

Nukes and electric cars = starving terrorist states.

Now if we can only convince the environmentalist to let us upgrade our electric transmission system and build nukes.

60 posted on 11/13/2008 10:06:32 AM PST by listenhillary (No representation without taxation! ~~ Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson