Skip to comments.
ExxonMobil Technology Makes Breakthrough with World's Largest LNG Carrier
Rig Zone ^
| December 17, 2008
| Exxon Mobil Corp
Posted on 12/17/2008 8:39:03 AM PST by thackney
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: thackney; Yo-Yo
I’m guessing most of the gas will go to Asian customers.
21
posted on
12/17/2008 9:54:35 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
To: thackney
Goodness sakes! Don’t they think about INSURANCE?? Especially in these Troublesome times, PIRATES, Terrorists ETC?
22
posted on
12/17/2008 9:56:06 AM PST
by
noah
(noah)
To: FBD; thackney
Then this is CHANGE we can BLEVE in?.............
23
posted on
12/17/2008 10:06:54 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Never has a man risen so far, so fast and is expected to do so much, for so many, with so little...)
To: Cronos
Im guessing most of the gas will go to Asian customers. Not all of it.
24
posted on
12/17/2008 10:23:46 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: GonzoGOP
Yes it will explode. It called a BLEVE (Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion) and they are particularly nasty. A myth for LNG.
In laboratory and open ocean combustion tests, there have been no documented cases of LNG BLEVEs. It is a theory that has never been capable of being produced and has been tested several times. LNG SAFETY MYTHS and LEGENDS http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/02/ngt/Quillen.pdf
25
posted on
12/17/2008 10:26:01 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
Point taken, I never said it was likely, just that it was possible. Any liquid that can be boiled off into a flammable gas can be made to BLEVE if you can dump enough heat into a pressurized container. You could put corn oil into an old steam engine boiler, bolt down the safety valve, and heat it over a roaring fire for a few hours (or more likely days) and eventually it would burst the boiler and BLEVE.
Its just a matter of dumping enough heat into the tank to overwhelm the safety valve and cause the tank walls to fail catastrophically. Oddly enough the larger the tank the less likely it is to BLEVE because of the amount of heat that you would need to add to get the tank to fail. And hitting the tank with a missile would just allow the tank to vent faster, hence as you pointed out a fire not an explosion. I agree that it is hard to imagine a way of getting that much heat onto the a ship that size for long enough to get it to explode. Of course its also hard to blow up a carbon core nuclear reactor but the Russians did it by running the reactor at full power, with all of the safety systems deactivated and the cooling pumps turned off.
26
posted on
12/17/2008 11:29:33 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: GonzoGOP
Add to that posibility the insulation and double hull construction of an LNG carrier. Most, if not all, designs use space between the insulated LNG pressure vessels and ships outer hull as water ballast tanks.
It is significantly different than a propane carrier.
27
posted on
12/17/2008 11:33:34 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson