Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biological Big Bang: Another Explosion at the Dawn of Life (things couldn't be worse for Darwin!)
CEH ^ | July 23, 2009

Posted on 07/31/2009 2:08:23 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: Nathan Zachary
All his pdf tree proves is the creator used a the same kinds of materials in different combinations for all his creations, kind of like how a painter uses the same primary colors of paint to make millions of different colors, and uses those to paint all kinds of different paintings from portraits to landscapes.

Precisely...there's no evidence of anything else here but design.

61 posted on 08/01/2009 10:38:22 AM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
LOL...Haven’t you heard, various scientific polls peg the evo-atheists as the kookiest fringies around.

Thanks, GGG, but (excepting the Baylor survey specifically) I was already aware of all that. I have that book by Gardner, and even remember reading that article in the Skeptical Enquirer way back in the 1980s.

I don't think it contradicts the observation, however much anecdotal on my part, that those who believe in one nutty thing tend to believe in others.

And no, despite being a secularist myself, I do not consider religious belief per se to be nutty at all. Nor, on the other side of the question, do I consider paranormal and occult beliefs to complete the universe of nutty beliefs.

As far as "evo-atheists" specifically, I doubt they make up much of that "31% of people who never worship" who "expressed strong belief in the "occult and the paranormal". First, strict atheists tend to consider such beliefs to be religious and disdain them also, and second atheists only make up about 9% percent of the population anyway.

You'll find (as your own quote indicates) wide disparities on this among regularly worshiping religionists, as there are likewise disparities in acceptance of antievolutionary creationism. Interestingly, modern young earth creationism was initially devised, developed and promulgated by Seventh Day Adventists, (no offense to them, but) often considered to be a "cult" by other Christians.

It is obvious that conservative Adventists pushed YEC and flood geology in defense of founding prophetess Ellen G. White's visions of The Flood and her insistence that it was global and had deposited the fossil record. One nutty thing led to another at least in that case. Of course, on the other hand, sober and generally unexciting Lutherans also tended to be early adopters of YEC

62 posted on 08/01/2009 12:33:13 PM PDT by Stultis (Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; Democrats always opposed waterboarding as torture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

...so it’s not a simple picture.


63 posted on 08/01/2009 12:35:02 PM PDT by Stultis (Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; Democrats always opposed waterboarding as torture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Ping!”

This is an unsigned article, so how can I make fun of the lack of scientific qualifications of the author if he/she will not make him/herself known?

Why do you think they don’t sign their name(s) to this article?


64 posted on 08/01/2009 6:04:40 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“I never claimed to know everything. Still, it’s infinitely more than the Evos will ever know (in this lifetime) about the origin and diversity of life. Of course, everthing will be revealed when they stand before the judgement seat of their Creator.”

You seem to set yourself apart from those who will receive judgement. You will definitely lose points for that when your time comes.


65 posted on 08/01/2009 6:08:13 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson