Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two meter sea level rise unstoppable: experts
Reuters ^ | Wed Sep 30 2009 | Gerard Wynn

Posted on 10/01/2009 9:09:02 PM PDT by JmyBryan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Boogieman
... offset the DROP in sea level that would be caused by the melting of floating ice ...

There is no drop in sea leave due to melting of floating ice.

21 posted on 10/01/2009 9:31:09 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

We're all going to die ! - (Alert)


This is getting repetitive - or - Here we go again !
22 posted on 10/01/2009 9:31:13 PM PDT by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Beats the heck out of an ice age.


23 posted on 10/01/2009 9:31:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (Everybody knows it's a spotted dog...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
Nothing stays the same like I want it! The sky is falling, the sky is falling.

BTW whats wrong with having a few more Venices, Huh?

24 posted on 10/01/2009 9:36:44 PM PDT by Candor7 (The effective weapons against Fascism are ridicule, derision, and truth (Member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

Woo hoo! I’m at 5500 feet above sea level!


25 posted on 10/01/2009 9:37:56 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Why not, since ice is less dense than liquid water?


26 posted on 10/01/2009 9:40:42 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Boogieman
Why not, since ice is less dense than liquid water?

By definition, a floating object displaces exactly its own weight in water. Thus the floating ice weighs exactly the same as the displaced water is is occupying.

When it melts it will be water and fill exactly the volume that it had displaced.

28 posted on 10/01/2009 9:45:28 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

It’s odd how the envirowhackos always have us in an unstable equilibrium that will accelerate us into catastrophe once perturbed.

I would think they would expect nature to have already perturbed us out of such unstable equilibria, leaving us in only stable equilibria, that resist change.

But thinking always gets me in trouble.


29 posted on 10/01/2009 9:46:18 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
How soon until Washington DC is submerged and we're safe from Fedzilla?

(not soon enough!)

30 posted on 10/01/2009 9:46:55 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

When it melts it will be water and fill exactly the volume that it had displaced.”

Actually, that is wrong as water expands when it freezes and would displace more than it’s volume.


31 posted on 10/01/2009 9:47:42 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

why is it that real scientists dont pipe up and say.. “this guy is an idiot. why isnt he flipping burgers at McDonalds?”


32 posted on 10/01/2009 9:50:32 PM PDT by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan

The seas will rise 2 meters huh?

I’d like to know, have they risen even a single inch?


33 posted on 10/01/2009 9:50:36 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
"His best guess was a one meter rise this century, assuming three degrees warming, and up to five meters over the next 300 years."

Sigh... Okay New Orleans, you've been warned, so in 2309, you'll have no excuse.
34 posted on 10/01/2009 9:50:41 PM PDT by TruthBeforeAll (The Top 10 Most Murderous Cities in the US (per capita) Are All Run By Dem Mayors - 2005 Report)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Ah yes, Archimedes, how could I forget that! So the floating ice would be a net zero, it’s only the runoff from ice on land you would have to worry about. Thanks for the correction.


35 posted on 10/01/2009 9:52:04 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: philetus
lly, that is wrong

Actually it is right. But I don't have time tonight to bring you up to speed. Go google it.

36 posted on 10/01/2009 9:52:35 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: philetus

No, he’s right. Because the extra volume that the water gains by freezing should be exactly the same as the volume of the floating ice which is above the water line, due to the principle of buoyancy.


37 posted on 10/01/2009 9:54:12 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: philetus

That would be a consideration if the icebergs were artificially held below the surface of the water, so that the entire volume of the iceberg was displacing an equally-sized volume of water. However that is not the case, as icebergs float, displacing a weight of water equal to the weight of the iceberg (but not equal to the entire volume of the iceberg)...


38 posted on 10/01/2009 9:55:29 PM PDT by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
Our only hope is for the government to confiscate all of our wealth and property and freedoms.

That's a good start. But to truly avoid calamity, we must reduce the human population by two thirds, abandon all use of fossil fuels and modern farming methods, and return to the forests.

Then we'll be okay.

39 posted on 10/01/2009 9:57:33 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo; Boogieman

curses,foiled again!


40 posted on 10/01/2009 10:00:01 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson