Posted on 11/24/2009 11:23:37 PM PST by neverdem
Thank you very much for the post. I finally get to resurrect all of my years of F77 education. There is much more in this code that I am slugging through. BTTT!
btt
http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1433905#1433905
Watch this space:
This?
"Does this mean we can have our incandescent light bulbs back?"
...is going to become the rallying cry that helps drag this swindle into the light of day.
And yes, it is a swindle- a fraud-- a deliberately designed construct intended to cheat you out of things you hold dear-- money, prosperity, freedom... and a few other things, as well.
...Watch this space...
I'm keeping a running file ( always updated ) on this fraud and scandal:
"Hadley CRU has apparently been hacked [epic fraud?]"
Click the picture:
They’re had. Even though there will be die hard warmers, including that SOB in office, the electorate is catching on. I want every school who insisted on showing the Goreacle’s crockumentary to review this material. Spread the word.
It depends on which "real temperature measurements" they chose. Remember, the balloon and satellite temperature data also show either no warming or only a very slight warming. The ONLY contemporary temperature data that actually shows warming are those from the land-based weather stations, and that has already been show by McIntyre to have significant problems.
So it may actually be the case that the tree-ring data really DOES match real temperature measurements, and both sets show no warming.
Perhaps CRU's next major publication should be entitled "The CRU Cookbook: 100 Fudged Recipes That Will Warm Your World."
Petition the Law Makers to Stop this Scam
Its time to put this rest
The IPCC did their best
But no one is buying their BS
CO2 Lags Temperature
The ice has shown
The Hot Spot in the Atmosphere ran off with the Heat in the Oceans
And cant be found
Hockey Stick is Broken and the MWP is UP Side Down
The 60s were warmer than 2009. The trend line is against us The Team thundered
Then they sliced and diced until its under.
They said the debate was closed.
And they control the Journals you know
They hid the data with a frown.
If found out, The Team goes down
The Teams goose cooked like they cooked the Books.
Theyre no better than the Eron Crooks.
Theyll say they did it for prestige and pride
And, of course, a big slice of the money pie
So, make your case CO2, that Evil Gas, Rules the Climate if you can
Or declare CO2 a non pollutant
And take it out of EPAs Hand
Petition the Law Makers to Stop this Scam
I’ve read on this very website, within the last two years, that the computer models are flawed. Now we have incontrovertible proof.
Yada,yada, yada. One thing you can always count on the left to do is pretend that their words don't mean what they say. Its so childish !
(You who search for my stuff, and you know who you are: Be sure to read this.)
ML/NJ
That is another perspective. You make a good point.
Among the e-mails released in the recent scandal are a couple from a plant specialist expressing his concern to, I think it was Phil Jones, about the use of tree rings to measure temperatures. He was saying that tree rings are affected by several factors and he doubted that you could separate those effects to determine how much was due to temperature. Apparently, Jones never responded to his e-mails.
The things in this American Thinker piece are either facts or they are not. It's pretty easy to see why so many people are able to live in an alternate reality with their smug attitudes of superiority when they continue to trust the NYT to deliver the news to them.
I did a search just at nytimes.com for CRU. Several articles from past days do show up. All except two appear to be associated with "blogs." Maybe these other two were in the printed paper during past days, but if they were my guess is that they were buried someplace were a newsreader might likely miss them.
ML/NJ
Has anyone noticed that wikipedia is pretty much devoid of mention of the CRU file release? No mention of it on the current “Hadley Centre” page. After being put in with a reference it was edited out. Ditto for Michael Mann’s page. The page “Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research File Release Incident” has been deleted altogether. Phil Jones’ page does mention it, but downplays it at the same time.
hide the decline, hide the incident, hide the truth.
Probably nothing. In Gore's defense, he appears to be exceptionally stupid.
ML/NJ
The tree ring data (cherry picked from tree rings that didn’t support their hockey stick, from trees in the Ural Mountains) was used to dispose of the “inconvenient” Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.
Well, I've never studied up on how they determine temps using tree rings. I thought it was something like measuring the O16/O18 isotope ratio, which ought to be pretty independent of other factors.
Enter “Climate fraud” in Google.
Get 2,950,000 hits.
Methinks it’s a bit late for somebody out there. Dam’s plumb broke on this deal, and the enviroweenies are all running for the boats.
This Day in History November 24,1871 National Rifle Association organized in New York City
NRA Fights Back Against Bloomberg's Gun Control Coalition
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.