Posted on 04/18/2010 6:22:14 AM PDT by blam
Rasmussen just had Obama 42% Ron Paul 41%.
The point is, I think the Republican, whoever it is, is likely to win in 2012. Is there more about Pataki than “he can win”?
Is he right on the issues?
It eventually falls back to earth, where some of it gets sucked into subduction zones between tectonic plates, and a billion or so years later gets blown back into the atmosphere.
Repeat as required.
Repeal Health Care? That is as right as you can get.
So the way to avoid a sure loser is to nominate a far-left liberal like Pataki? Gimme a break. Pataki is pro-illegal-immigration, pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-cap-and-trade and in the pocket of the unions. We'd be better off nominating a moderate Southern Democrat if that's the direction we want to go in.
Pataki is to the LEFT of Obama on gay marriage, on unions, on cap & trade and on immigration. He once refused to speak at a Republican National Convention because the party platform denounced illegal immigration and Pataki's whole family were illegal immigrants.
He is a winner when talking about repealing health care. Are you for that.?
Environmentally I find this all very “amusing” LOL
Well, then I don’t care if he’s “electable” because we can easily get someone elected that we like.
I think we shouldn’t forget that 40% of Americans are Conservative, and only 20% are Liberal.
You mean like “end the mandate”? Ron Paul is already on that.
Pataki isn’t exactly offering anything fresh with repealing Health Care. Very few Republicans support Obamacare.
Yes, the fuel consumption is so much greater the airline would have to raise fares substantially...And, of course, a non-stop transatlantic flight could not be completed at low altitude (well, it would come to a conclusion, but several hundred miles short of the destination).
......I’m a catastrophist afterall...
and I Grasshopper, follow you path of study so carefully laid out
an interesting link I found while googling...
Not sure if it will bring anything but ridicule, though.
http://www.aquasoul.com/EarthChanges.html
The ash is not expected to pose a health risk as long as it stays in the upper atmosphere, the World Health Organization said.
Well, at least we got that going for us..../s
Yes, and if he really wanted to prove how great he is, he could have special blowers installed that would pull in more of the dust into his engines than normal just to show how harmless it really is.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.