Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Senate Democrats Gather In The Rules Committee To Eliminate The Filibuster
Gateway Pundit ^ | 04/22/10 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 04/22/2010 2:31:27 PM PDT by American Dream 246

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last
To: Gabrial

I would really like to see some of these clowns lose their heads. It might serve as a deterent.


101 posted on 04/22/2010 6:18:58 PM PDT by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246

Lest they forget....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CzteDucRHo


102 posted on 04/22/2010 6:19:29 PM PDT by RasterMaster (The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Dream 246; Congressman Billybob; kristinn

Doesn’t it take 67 votes to change a rule like that? I think this is a media scare tactic, crap...like the “Obama cancels national day of prayer” on April 15.

I submit this query to smarter folk than I.


103 posted on 04/22/2010 6:21:18 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

He might switch to mincing.


104 posted on 04/22/2010 6:23:10 PM PDT by Defiant (If 30 million freedom-loving Americans moved to Australia,it would be the leading power in 10 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: AU72

It is a raw, naked power grab. The Rats think that they can do enough damage that for the two 1/2 years that Obastard will hold veto power that it can never be undone.


105 posted on 04/22/2010 6:27:18 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

No, the Constitution states that the Senate has the ability to make its own rules and its rules say that they can change the rules with a simple majority.


106 posted on 04/22/2010 6:30:38 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The Rats cannot make a rule that binds a future Senate.


107 posted on 04/22/2010 6:32:21 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

What America-hating freaks these DIMs are! Vote them out! In the meantime why aren’t the Republicans screaming?????


108 posted on 04/22/2010 6:59:27 PM PDT by hal ogen ($10 (I think) ajmo0unts through the internet from all over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Republicans have got to play on a level playing field - know what I mean? Otherwise they will be shut out forever - we are at the tipping point with an equal number of people in the wagon and the other half pulling. Guess which party gets all the votes from those in the wagon getting the free ride?

IT IS NOW OR NEVER.
109 posted on 04/22/2010 6:59:55 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American <strike>Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
In the meantime why aren’t the Republicans screaming?????

You can bet that they are. But you can't hear them because the MSM isn't about to give them a megaphone.

110 posted on 04/22/2010 7:01:19 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I am not sure about that....


111 posted on 04/22/2010 7:01:35 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
This is what is known as the actual "nuclear option"

The "nuclear option" would have involved VP Cheney ruling that the filibuster rule did not apply to a vote to confirm, or reject, a judicial nomination. The Senate rules are silent on the point, and the filibuster was not routinely used against judicial nominees until recent years. It would have been a hardball move, but the chair does have the power to resolve disputes.

This, if true, is very different. This is an attempt to overturn by trickery a rule that every Democrat in the Senate (including then RINO Specter, minus Franken who was not seated), specifically voted in favor of just back in January of 2009.

Back when the nuclear option was being talked about, I said that the Republicans ought to go ahead and do it, as the first time the filibuster kept the Democrats from doing something they wanted, when they had a majority, and a the Presidency, they would just change the rules themselves.

Depressing to (apparently) be proven right.

112 posted on 04/22/2010 7:02:04 PM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
11/2010
11/2012


TOO LATE.
113 posted on 04/22/2010 7:02:29 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American <strike>Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

“The only surprise is the lack of repulsion from the public for the administrations agenda.”

The public is repulsed. We’re just biding our time until November. True, there are many who are either all for socialism or those who aren’t paying attention. But, I think the Dems already know the public at large is after their collective, sorry a**es!


114 posted on 04/22/2010 7:02:41 PM PDT by southernsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: southernsunshine
Republicans Block Start of Debate on Financial Bill

Gee, where is all the comity in the Senate? Well when you are dealing with Chicago thugs, that goes out the window I guess. Reid says they learned a lesson with Demcare and they are not about to let the nasty Repubs spread any lies this time around. JAM IT DOWN AS QUICK AS THEY CAN. This is what America wants according to RATS.
115 posted on 04/22/2010 7:12:39 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American <strike>Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell
You know that as soon as the RATs lose power in the Senate it will be back to "Filibuster-Forever."

Why am I so afraid for Nov?

116 posted on 04/22/2010 7:22:41 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Too stupid and lazy?


117 posted on 04/22/2010 7:40:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
"This, if true, is very different. This is an attempt to overturn by trickery a rule that every Democrat in the Senate (including then RINO Specter, minus Franken who was not seated), specifically voted in favor of just back in January of 2009."

Yes, I agree there is a wholesale difference between what was being contemplated then, and what the Dems are thinking about now. But, the parliamentary maneuver - just describing the mechanics of how they make this work - is the same.

But, what are the Republicans going to do? Maybe they sue, in an attempt to get the Dems to follow the Senate rules - Powell v McCormack maybe helps theme here - but I think it's a very long shot. People overlook the power of the VP when acting in the capacity of President of the Senate. Even Cheney during the legislative debate over the Bush tax cuts wouldn't act in this manner when some wanted him to overrule the parliamentarian using a point of order maneuver. Cheney said, no thanks. We will see if Biden does the same. I'm not going to hold my breath. They know that they're getting fired in 7 months, and this might be their last chance for a while to move their legislative initiatives.

I underestimated their treachery (that's really all you can call it) in the health care debacle. I won't make that mistake twice.

118 posted on 04/22/2010 7:48:43 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Yup. Now we won’t need 60 seats to kill 0bamacare in 2013. Bring it on suckers!

Yeah, but the problem is that after the filibuster is gone the Democrats will make it impossible to ever win an election again by giving all of the illegal aliens amnesty and voting rights. Which will quickly be followed by putting an ULTRACOMMIE on the Supreme Court with ease. They could pack all of the courts with commie supporters, and they couldn't be removed by simple majority. There will be unbridled power to dismantle the rest of the constitution and 8 months to do it in. The Supreme Court couldn't stop them, because they could just pack the court by passing a law by simple majority. Heck, what if the Dems just go for the whole enchilada and suspend elections in November and rule by simple majority. Will they do all of this? Who knows? How crazy do you think they are?

119 posted on 04/22/2010 7:49:07 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

I am scared to death that 0 will pull something to not only keep control of the legislature but somehow garner more senate seats. He is soooo corrupt that he would do it i the light of day and laugh!


120 posted on 04/22/2010 7:51:52 PM PDT by chooseascreennamepat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson