Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 07/18/2010 11:24:25 AM PDT by RogerFGay
80% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Naked Gun: “He’s got a fifty percent chance of living, but there’s only a 20 percent chance of that.”
Hoho! Oregon Petition — the shot heard round the warming community.
I thought it was 87.6%.
Record Cold At Antarctic Station
http://www.iceagenow.com/Record_Cold_At_Antarctic_Station.htm
Argentina in Antarctic cold snap -
‘Southern Hemisphere is freezing’ - 15 Jul 10
South Africa’s Frost will see vegetable prices rocket - 15 Jul 10
Temperature hits record low in Brazil - 15 Jul 10
New Zealand - Mercury plunges to record lows - 14 Jul 10
Alberta Walloped with Heavy Snow - In mid July! - 13 July 10
http://www.iceagenow.com/2009_Other_Parts_of_the_World.htm
Record Collapse of Earth’s Upper Atmosphere
http://www.iceagenow.com/Record_Collapse_of_Earths_Upper_Atmosphere.htm
Global warming my backside -
Coldest day in Australia in almost 100 years
http://www.iceagenow.com/Global_warming_my_backside_Coldest_day_in_Australia_in_100_years.htm
Meteorologist Forecasts Drastic Cooling!
uses NOAA’s own data
http://www.iceagenow.com/Meteorologist_Forecasts_Drastic_Cooling.htm
Scientific herds all mindlessly running the same direction (usually chasing grant money these days) always remind me of Einstein’s reaction when told that a pamphlet entitled “100 Authors Against Einstein” had been published: “If I were wrong, one would have been enough.”
Every prediction of the anthropogenic theory has been falsified, and the only “proof” ever offered of its validity as a causal theory were computer models. It’s wrong. One scientist pointing that out is enough.
I take it the survey didn’t bother asking any Russian climatologists, virtually all of whom think AGW is rot, that the sun is the main driver, and that we’re likely heading for an ice age.
“80% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
Yes, but that only happens 62% of the time. “
BUT, only after a coin flip.
Gore-Bull warming
RE: Einstein comment - yep.
When Gore bought his new house near sea level the hoax was exposed.
Of course computer models only model what they are told to model. Modeling the atmosphere and the oceans is something that we do not presently haed the capability to do. So I don’t accept AGW. Especially when politicians who do accept it want my tax money and a lower standard of living for all US citizens as the price.
Thanks for posting the entire article. Nice job on the formatting and the links too.
Studies have been shown to be a leading cause of statistics.
83.47%
Please get your numbers straight. < /s>
This is similar to how we have a global temperature for a year calculated to within a tenth of a degree Celsius. Ever wonder how that gets calculated? Yeah, me too. And I’ll donate another $25 on top of my monthly if you can find a clear exposition on that. From what I can tell, it doesn’t exist.
Another statistic I’d like to really have - what is the average amount of AGW grant money those 97% of the 1,372 scientists received over the last 5 years. Follow the money.
Yes, that's true – and 79.62357% of those are reported at an unreasonable level of precision. :=)
Like in Political Polls. Candidate X has 53% support in the polls and that poll is 95% right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.