Posted on 12/03/2010 11:58:16 AM PST by EveningStar
Well, I hate to admit it but Armstrong is right.
She would be far more viable as a candidate if she had more experience.
Like, oh, I don't know, say 155 days in The U.S. Senate?
Maybe if she golfed more. Shot more hoops.
Oh, I know. Maybe she can take teleprompter reading lessons.
Wait. She's a highly trained television broadcast specialist. She used to be a sportscaster. They use teleprompters!
Somebody ping Armstrong Williams.
Wait until Sarah actually announces. . That’s when the exploding heads will occur and all the pre-written articles will come out. . the more the better as far as I’m concerned. . Bring it on Libs, Attack Sarah at Will and see what happens!
If we can’t win with Palin, we don’t deserve to win.. period.
I believe our future is at stake here. I will not accept a RINO.
What are those shortcomings? Please list.
When McCain ran against the inexperienced Obama; the media dropped McCain like a hot potato because they wanted the America hating socialist Obama.
When the time comes, the Media will do the same thing with Sarah Palin. They will suppport her opponent, and tear her down. - Tom
Her shortcomings are less than all the REST!
I also have found it is pointless to point out to those who think she would be a disaster for conservatives if she ran for POTUS.
“I CANNOT think of a single shortcoming”
How about she supported that RINO POS for re-election?
And her not very exact stand on illigal immigration.
Also she Quicker in getting her words out, then any politician in the last 50 years, this is a sign she says what she believes!
Finally, someone who tells the Truth,
She a woman, some seems to think a women can’t run this country, that’s another reason why she needs to be the first women President!
She would do a lot to hurt men having sex with men lifestyle,
Normal would be back in again!
That’s probably the biggest reason that the anti Palin freepers keeping spurring out all the same negatives Reagan lived with, yes, our token liberal democrat Trolls and with their sick lifestyle)!
I wonder if “pissant” is a LOG CABIN REPUBLICAN?
Now his name makes sense!
A peculiar observation. Armstrong makes no argument about Palin, except to puzzle over the motives of the media. Not much substance there.
As for her alleged "shortcomings," nobody's perfect of course, but I await the first concrete example of a "disqualifiying" shortcoming from her detractors. I'm not holding my breath waiting, btw.
I was calling the author a liar for this:
“the media seems to be rather blind to them”
I meant in that excerpt.
Oh, please. What was she supposed to do? Turn him down? Accept, and then support Obama?
I would have done the same thing, and then made things VERY uncomfortable for McCaine if he crossed me on key issues, if we won. He couldn't very well fire me, could he?
ML/NJ
pissant, ping to post 22.
Why not ask him?
She could hav ewaited until the fight between JD and McCain was decided.
She could have waited until the fight between JD and McCain was decided.
There was a fight?
I think she did. WTF is/was "JD"?
ML/NJ
You are right. But what does that have to do with 2012? Nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.