Posted on 12/04/2010 7:32:45 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
According to Wikipedia, George Pal was going to film After Worlds Collide, the sequel to WWC, but could not get financing. A pity.
Yes objects would be pulled towards it as the planet passed. Unless the objects were very near they would be unlikely to be pulled completely in. The result would be the comet (or some other object) being left with an usually elliptical orbit that would eventually send it close to the sun.
Brian Marsden, the Australian astronomer, who recently died, wrote a book about comets/asteroids bombarding Earth.
There is evidence for periodicity in the bombardments; about 30-33 million year intervals IIRC. That makes us due for another bombardment any day now.
Oort Cloud objects are so far out that it takes very little to nudge them into a parabolic path to the inner Solar System. Marsden warned that it is not Near Earth Objects that we should beware of, but large bodies which suddenly appear from much farther out.
I had a colleague who worked with Sitchin on some esoteric translation job. He said the man was cranky and incredibly talented, and surprisingly disorganized.
I’ve read all his books, by the way. I realize he was wrong in many of his interpretations, but that doesn’t stop his work from being fascinating.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
Stealth planet eh? Calling Commander Cody and The Lost Planet Airmen!!
Zecharia Sitchin’s Errors: An Overview
by Michael S. Heiser http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/925869/posts?page=80#80
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Thanks.
Excellent.........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfLs9JJ_p7M
my pleasure.
Ok, for starters, submitting a hypothesis based on an observation is exactly what has happened here:
Scientists observe a pattern in the arrival of comets from the Oort cloud.
Hypothesis: something large out there periodically passes through the cloud, perturbing the orbits of the ice chunks there thus causing them to begin falling in towards the inner solar system. Next question, what could the object be? Most likely candidate is a planet-sized or larger body. Given the number of binary star systems we have observed, and the structure of our own system, candidate is narrowed down to a category of star called a “brown dwarf”, that is, an object that didn’t quite reach fusion density.
You’re making this out like brown dwarfs are something we made up, and that we know nothing about space beyond the orbit of Pluto. This is false. Here’s the info:
This hypothetical partner to our sun would have formed at the same time as the rest of the solar system, and would therefore be about the same age. It may have had a temperature somewhat hotter than Jupiter did at the time of its formation, but has cooled (like all other non-fusing bodies in our solar system) over time since then. As a sidebar, Jupiter probably did fuse hydrogen for a brief time after its formation as well. This body however, formed out past the orbit of Pluto, in a region called the Oort cloud, which is largely chunks of frozen gases and other ice that didn’t get drawn into the planetary accretion disk. The Oort cloud orbits the sun about one light year out. This is still well within the range for a binary star pair. Anything that far out isn’t going to get any benefit from the energy of our sun. It would have to provide its own energy, or it will become all but invisible through 5 billion years of radiational cooling.
So, brown dwarfs are known objects. We’ve seen them in other places. We know how they form, and their structure (big, Jupiter-like, though more dense). The Oort cloud is pretty much accepted as existing, though direct observation is difficult (oort objects are likely no more than a mile across, something which is hard to spot at a distance of a light-year). Thus, *if* there is a brown dwarf out there, we know what it should look like. And, we know what the conditions are like where it might be. What remains now is to put together the right instrument to detect this object, if it exists, and determine its orbit.
The *only* missing information here is the existence of a brown dwarf in *our* solar system. Their existence elsewhere is confirmed, and the existence of the Oort cloud is widely accepted based on observations of comets that do come in to the inner solar system. The scientists believe, based on those comet observations, that there is periodicity, and that implies something moving through the cometary cloud, since comet orbits are so far out otherwise that they wouldn’t be perturbed by objects in the inner system. *That’s* what they’re testing. They haven’t published anything but the hypothesis. I studied astronomy, so I’m fairly up-to-date on what we know. This would only seem far-fetched or “made up” if one didn’t have current knowledge of the frequency of binary-star systems, solar system formation, and stars.
"Well, isn't that just dandy?"
Am I paranoid or is it my Jedi sixth sense?
Note that food prices, especially grains, have jumped. Heard the other day that over 50% of all freeze dried food sold is going to the federal government.
If there was a big rock with our name on it headed this way, the government would quietly begin building shelters for the nomenklatura and stocking them with food. They would NOT tell us peons.
Time to consider stocking up on some more food from Walton Feed.
OK who had “Planet X” in the TETOWAKI office pool?
Maybe it was actually a prophecy about Zer0.
Black hole son won't you comeand wash away the rain...
Hope and Change come and gone
and now we're all in pain...
“Is Tyche really out there?
The fact of Tyche’s existence is questionable, since the pattern seen in the outer Oort cloud is not seen in the inner Oort”
Chasing ghosts again.
But again we are talking about “something large out there” that I guess we are now identifying as a brown dwarf, that is the “hypothetical partner to our sun” that we are now giving an age to and a temperature to and assuming that it is “all but invisible”.
I am sorry but “the only missing information” is not if a brown dwarf is in our solar system but the missing information is any actual information about the object we are talking about. Your own statements point to this...”hypothetical partner”, “all but invisible”, “if there is a brown dwarf out there”, “if it exists”.
Something may be out there...and there probably is. My issue is with adding all this “information” that people read as “FACTS” when at this point we do not have any facts to point to. We have observed something about the comets and their pattern, this would be the facts that we know at this time. What is causing this pattern is now in the area of hypothesis but at this time we do not have facts to back up this hypothesis as fact, are there other possibilities for what could be causing the pattern? I do not know, but to have a hypothesis that then creates a planet or brown dwarf that we then add an age and temp and surface and size and...when we do not know at this time that this brown dwarf even exists seems unwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.