Skip to comments.
Scientists Find Huge Underground River Below Amazon
IBTimes ^
| 26 August 2011
Posted on 08/27/2011 6:55:20 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Fractal Trader
NEWS FLASH: The headwaters of this newly discovered river has been pinpointed to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. since it was earlier discovered that the river consisted of bile and BS and scientists traced it back to its source.
21
posted on
08/27/2011 7:40:49 AM PDT
by
cashless
(Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
To: Fractal Trader
The geology/physics of aquifers are so different from rivers it seems worthy of a different name. Calling them rivers obfuscates what’s going on rather than informing.
22
posted on
08/27/2011 7:41:33 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: Fractal Trader
I believe Professor Challenger discovered and charted this river in 1895, but lost all his data in a shipwreck. Everybody called his story a lie. The prof was used to that sort of thing.
23
posted on
08/27/2011 7:43:40 AM PDT
by
tlb
To: norwaypinesavage; All
One of the first things they teach you in engineering college (for those that didnt learn it before Kindergarten) is: Water runs down hill. Stories of underground rivers, 3 miles below the surface, violate that rule. The author is misrepresenting the data, either through lack of understanding, or over simplification, in my opinion. You are correct. However, it would be possible, because of the flow in the Amazon, that there would be sufficient pressure for the underground movement of the water toward the ocean.
The article doesn't say how much flow there is, only that there is flow. It only has to overcome the salinity gradient and the friction of movement through the porous rocks underground. If it moves very slowly, say in meters per year, this could be possible.
24
posted on
08/27/2011 7:47:27 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
To: Alas Babylon!
Dr. Phibes is interested...
25
posted on
08/27/2011 7:48:35 AM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(Democrats: debt, dependence and derision)
To: DManA; All
The geology/physics of aquifers are so different from rivers it seems worthy of a different name. Calling them rivers obfuscates whats going on rather than informing. Bingo! We have a winner!
26
posted on
08/27/2011 7:49:05 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
To: Fractal Trader
so this means there is more fresh water on the planet than they thought... specially if other major rivers have the same underground twin
27
posted on
08/27/2011 7:50:13 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Chode
I want to buy some of it bottled :P
To: Loud Mime
Outstanding, one of my favorites!
BTW, I once saw a great special about the Oceans that actually feaured a lake beneath the ocean.
Somehow, the water at the bottom of the ocean was heavier and formed a lake on the bed of the sea.
To: norwaypinesavage
One of the first things they teach you in engineering college (for those that didnt learn it before Kindergarten) is: Water runs down hill. Stories of underground rivers, 3 miles below the surface, violate that rule. The author is misrepresenting the data, either through lack of understanding, or over simplification, in my opinion. I think the author of the story misinterpreted the data. What is really there is a massive aquifer that is moving tremendous amounts of water to the ocean and it will be released on the margins of the the continental shelf in the ocean.
30
posted on
08/27/2011 8:05:12 AM PDT
by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
To: norwaypinesavage
Actually, water runs from high pressure to low pressure and this may or may not be downhill. This holds accurate for both non-compressable fluids such as water and for compressible fluids, ie. a gas.
To: Maverick68
As I recall from that episode, that particular body of water was super salinated (really salty) and that was what made it heavier. I remember that it was ringed with muscles, wasn’t it?
It looked so cool, I wanted to visit... but you know, that psi issue and such. :-)
32
posted on
08/27/2011 8:17:16 AM PDT
by
RikaStrom
(Pray for Obama - Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his place of leadership.")
To: Maverick68
They've got one of those in Bikini Bottom. Sponge Bob and Patrick go there alot.
Somehow, the water at the bottom of the ocean was heavier and formed a lake on the bed of the sea.
33
posted on
08/27/2011 8:18:30 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: norwaypinesavage
One of the first things they teach you in engineering college (for those that didnt learn it before Kindergarten) is: Water runs down hill. Stories of underground rivers, 3 miles below the surface, violate that rule. One of the first things they teach you in geology courses is that vast underground aquifers exist. When the strata where they're located tilts (as from the high Andes east to the Atlantic) they flow "downhill." I'm very familiar with one similar aquifer right here in the U.S.A. The author perhaps oversimplifies when he calls the aquifer a "river." It is, in a sense, but most of his readers probably dont know what an aquifer is so he uses a familiar term instead.
To: Young Werther
35
posted on
08/27/2011 8:25:34 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 945 of America's holiday from reality...)
To: Fractal Trader
I don't know if it's true or not, but,
Pittsburgh, PA Point Park Fountain,
"t draws its water supply not from the visible waters which pass by it, but from an unnamed fourth river, subterranean, passing from the north to the south 54 feet below the surface of the Pittsburgh Point."
To: TexasFreeper2009
better hurry, the treehuggers will prolly soon find some way to make it untouchable...
37
posted on
08/27/2011 8:53:24 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: norwaypinesavage
One of the first things they teach you in engineering college (for those that didnt learn it before Kindergarten) is: Water runs down hill. Must have one heck of an hydraulic jump there.
My engineering education in fluid dynamics also causes me to believe that water flows from higher to lower elevations.
But I'm sure there's a computer model which shows the foolishness of our old-fashioned learning.
38
posted on
08/27/2011 9:03:50 AM PDT
by
Ole Okie
(!!)
To: Fractal Trader
“The width of the Hamza is said to be 3,700 miles long”
Ahh, to be a science journalist ... neither literacy nor numeracy required.
39
posted on
08/27/2011 9:08:23 AM PDT
by
fnord
(Republicans are just the right-wing of the left-wing of American politics)
To: Bernard Marx
Now, now.
Trying to crimp a naysayer’s rant with the truth only upsets them
. . . if they register the truth, at all.
40
posted on
08/27/2011 9:10:14 AM PDT
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson