Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Republican Case for Climate Action
NY Times ^ | August 1, 2013 | WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS, LEE M. THOMAS, WILLIAM K. REILLY and CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN

Posted on 08/04/2013 12:21:41 AM PDT by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: iowamark

I am glad they came out and stated this, now Congress should haul their asses in front of a CONGRESSIONAL HEARING and Force them to TESTIFY UNDER OATH, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, to these statements. Then see how fast they SHUT UP.


61 posted on 08/04/2013 7:14:23 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
"There is no longer any credible scientific debate about the basic facts: our world continues to warm, with the last decade the hottest in modern records..."

This is an outright lie. We have seen 15 years of global cooling based on even the UN's skewed figures. There has never been any scientific proof that molecular level changes in CO2 levels has anything to do with actual climate change...only a model based on manipulated data that has been proven to be wrong if not fraudulent. Actual global temperature readings are trending below even the lowest levels of this model. I am sick of these lies being portrayed as scientific truth.

62 posted on 08/04/2013 7:16:26 AM PDT by The Great RJ (construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

New satellite dataset finds global temperatures decreased from 1982-2006

http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/08/02/new-satellite-dataset-finds-global-temperatures-decreased-from-1982-2006/


63 posted on 08/04/2013 7:48:44 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (When America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Te people are delusional.

They think that by attaching the label “republican” to their argument, that it will carry more weight. I guess they’re assuming that the problem with the argument up to now, is that, it’s been mostly one-sided and liberal and lacking balance, so, perhaps getting some “republican” blood into the argument might give it some credibility.

Chances are that those “republicans” are nothing more than liberals using the republican label to help spread their lies and junk science.


64 posted on 08/04/2013 8:00:48 AM PDT by adorno (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

We have more people on the planet now. Those people need to breath oxygen. Therefore we need more oxygen. We need carbon dioxide to facilitate the process of creating oxygen (actually comes from the water in the reaction). Therefore we need more carbon dioxide, not less.

Therefore the liberals are trying to suffocate every one.

(Hardest hit: women and children:-))


65 posted on 08/04/2013 8:05:05 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Its amazing the way the warmists were caught falsifying data, disappearing data, threatening publications and trying to get scientists fired for not parroting the line... caught red-handed, and the press and the warmists pretend it never happened. In fact, if you get your news from the press you’d have no idea it ever happened.

They stand completely exposed as frauds and we’re expected to pretend we don’t know that.


66 posted on 08/04/2013 8:15:11 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

Geroge Carlin says it better:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0aFPXr4n4


67 posted on 08/04/2013 8:15:56 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE

Oops! GEORGE Carlin...


68 posted on 08/04/2013 8:17:03 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: piytar
There is no longer any credible scientific debate about the basic facts: our world continues to warm

You: A flat out lie.

Me: Remove the last five words and it becomes a truth.

69 posted on 08/04/2013 8:23:06 AM PDT by Moltke (Sapere aude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Can we take anything published in the New Yokel Times as having any meaning. After all, that organization which continually lectures us on economic issues—and trust me, this is an economic issue—purchased the Boston Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion and then purchased the Worcester Telegram and Gay-zette in 2000 for $295 million. They are in the process of selling both to John Henry (owner of the Boston Red Sox) for $70 million. That is an annual average loss of principal of 15.567%!!!


70 posted on 08/04/2013 8:32:39 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Have a wonderful day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Add me please.


71 posted on 08/04/2013 8:48:04 AM PDT by citizen (We get the government we choose. America either voted for Obama or handed it to him by not voting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Interesting musings but a policy based on a lie is still a lie. I don’t wish curses on those foolish people (they do a stunning job of wishing curses on themselves).


72 posted on 08/04/2013 10:07:18 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Whatever promise that God has made, in Jesus it is yes. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson