Let’s be realistic. Obama couldn’t wipe his ass without one of his handlers showing him how. He is an empty suit who knows how to be charismatic.
Isn’t this what an opposition party suppose to do?
When Republicans were in charge the Democrats did not give an inch. They made the Republican compromise so much you would have thought the Democrats were still in power.
If this administration does not get one more piece of legislation passed I will be happy and the nation will be better off because of it.
Ending income inequality...no more Martha’s Vinyard(sp) for Obama to vacay at cause the wealthy won’t have the wealth to afford it.
The hippies had the answer here. As I recall, it involved a government guarenteed annual income for all with confiscatory taxes on those earning more.
More Communism!
"And how can this be? For he is the Kwisatz Haderach Pussy!"
It is high time our ball-less Republican Eunichs in the House and Senate realize there is no peril in confronting this poser.
We don’t need less “inequality” we need more people getting wealthy (as in more than just those who are currently wealthy).
To respond to the absurd logic of combating “inequality” or “income gaps”, I defer to the Lady Thatcher:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okHGCz6xxiw
Marxism 2013! (Pay attention you who label Putin a ‘Communist’!)
Good. Since when was fixing “economic inequality” part of the Federal Government’s job?
What he means is his redistribution of wealth... as explained and articulated in the communist manifesto.
He is a great example of a POS who snuck into a position of power. He has never even given us he college records that he claims qualifies him for the job. He is a fraud, and according to him the only perfect person in Washington DC and the USA.
Listen to him, nothing that goes bad is either his responsibility or his fault but anything and everything that goes good and right he claims the spotlight for. Would any of you allow your own children to have this attitude and not correct them and make them take responsibility for themselves?? I didn't think so.
...as well they should. Income equality means everyone is equally poor, Obama.
How about Obama distribute, equally HIS wealth....say, among 10,000 random people without jobs. After all, it is HIS wealth.
Let me do what I want with what little wealth I have. Let Donald Trump do what HE wants with what wealth HE possesses.
Ever heard of freedom, Obama?
Oh, after 5 years, you’ve found what the problem is! Republicans. Brilliant!
Economic equality can, only, be achieved, if the government is not there to rob you of it.
Fighting "income inequality" isn't in your job description, moron. It's not something that you have the power to change anyway, except through the imposition of a Communist system of government, which you can only achieve by murdering half the citizens of this country.
So how far do you want to push this, Mr. Hope & Change?
BS to Obama.
In a kindergarten class, Obama would get near unanimous agreement with his efforts. But that's why all societies in history have had a clear, inflexible distinction between adult status and child status.
No one opposes efforts to fight eliminate or reduce economic inequality. Just the means of reducing or eliminating it.
Certainly, most adults should agree that it is wrong, both that the "wealthy" treat the poor literally as slaves, or that poor treat the "wealthy" literally as slaves, if in neither case the slave has no say in the matter.
Substitute "worker with a real (non government) job" for "wealthy," and "economic indolent parasite" for "poor" and the same moral and ethical truism holds.
even some in his own party are starting to back away from the destruction he is causing.
did anyone ask him what “economic equality” is and why do we need the government to enforce it. this is the Limbaugh Theorem in action.
He’s “fighting” Washington when he is Washington.