Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAPOLITANO: The Obama administration has gone rogue
The Washington Times ^ | October 9, 2013 | Andrew P. Napolitano

Posted on 10/10/2013 9:44:34 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: jazusamo

That’s not news to us!


21 posted on 10/10/2013 10:25:11 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Liberaltarians lack common sense.


22 posted on 10/10/2013 10:25:49 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic
Nice Post.... I don't always agree with the Judge, but beyond that, he points out the utter Hypocrisy of Obama.

Terrorist should be tried in a US civilian court, unless of course, I decide to execute them first.

We should close down Gitto and secret prisons.... however, US NAVY ship in international waters are fine.

The Boston Marathon suspect was Miranda by DOJ attorney and Federal Judge... When will the FBI board the Navy ship were al-Liba is being held and Miranda him...

23 posted on 10/10/2013 10:26:24 AM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: manc
Wonder if we served a warrant to Osama Ben Hidin before killing him.
24 posted on 10/10/2013 10:32:18 AM PDT by McGruff (Obama: The Problem Is ... I am Not the Emperor of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Re impeachment.

High crimes and misdemeanors are committed daily by this regime, but you can't indict the black guy.

The repubs have no spine or stomach for impeachment. The senate would not ever convict. If, somehow, it happened, you have Biden as president. There's an improvement!

It seems as if the self professed Kenyan is creating crisis after crisis. Every one greater than the last. Every one serving as a distraction from the real problem which is the continual trashing of the constitution, the ultimate legal backstop of the US.

I have no idea how this ends but the train seems to be heading straight towards fascism.

25 posted on 10/10/2013 10:34:44 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Cruz/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
rarestia :" The Judge is right: America is no longer a nation of laws but a nation of men."

Tilted Irish Kilt Correction: America is no longer a nation of laws but a nation governed by lawless, arrogant men.

Final Correction: America is no longer a nation of laws but a nation governed by lawless, arrogant men women.

26 posted on 10/10/2013 10:43:23 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I agree, our ‘operatives’, are trained well and dang good at it. I'm glad we have ‘em. Only in the 0pansy world would they be considered a threat.

(side note: STL won last night, will the Tigers come back? As we have talked before, a rematch of the Cards and Tigers would be great. Good luck tonight. GO Cards)

27 posted on 10/10/2013 10:43:48 AM PDT by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar and Hates.........he just hates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I think it was an US Army Delta Force team, not the US Navy Seals that went into Libya.


28 posted on 10/10/2013 10:50:18 AM PDT by rocksblues (The Obama administration the most unlawful, corrupt administration in US history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The team in Libya was reported not to be NSWDevGru but SFOD-1 Delta supported by CIA shooters and FBI HRT. If the Judge is going to report, at least he should be accurate.


29 posted on 10/10/2013 10:51:43 AM PDT by astounded (Barack Obama is a clear and present danger to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues; astounded

You’re both correct.

Delta Force strike was in Libya, SEALS strike was in Somalia.


30 posted on 10/10/2013 10:57:23 AM PDT by jazusamo ([Obama] A Truly Great Phony -- Thomas Sowell http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3058949/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

In what way is he contradicting himself?


31 posted on 10/10/2013 11:05:03 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

32 posted on 10/10/2013 11:13:19 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bombs dropped under Republican administration = Bad
Bombs dropped under Democrat administration = Good?

Interrogation done under Republican administration = Bad
Interrogation done under Democrat administration = Good?

Guantanamo under Republican administration = Bad
Guantanamo under Democrat administration = Good?

Afghanistan under Republican administration = Bad
Afghanistan under Democrat administration = Good?

Libya....oh, that’s right.....this one is all Democrat.
Overthrowing the government of Libya under Democrat administration = Good?


33 posted on 10/10/2013 11:15:31 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc
Actually, I don't just think an arrest warrant is required, I KNOW an arrest warrant is required in order to legally arrest someone who is to be put on trial in a civilian court under the jurisdiction of the United States.

U.S. Constitution - Amendment 5 - "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury..."

The "presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury" is also known as an arrest warrant.

Now, if a person is suspected of committing an act of war against the United States, and said person is to be arrested and detained for prosecution in a military tribunal, I am not at all sure that an arrest warrant would be required.

The United States military is not, and should not be used as, a civilian law enforcement agency.

34 posted on 10/10/2013 11:21:34 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Our guys are trained to break things and hurt people. Serving arrest warrants is beneath them.

Put another way, the decision to use military personnel to perform an action, is a decision to step outside the framework of law, and the person making that decision is responsible for the consequences.

Soldiers are not police, and the decision to use one like the other is damaging to the Constitution. This also goes in the other direction, where you equip and train police like soldiers. The line between the two should NOT be crossed.

35 posted on 10/10/2013 11:22:50 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity
May G-d Himself help us when foreign nationals start doing the same to our citizens whom they think have committed crimes against them in their own countries. It will be open season on our military men and women.

That's already happened in the UK, in the murder of Brit soldier Lee Rigby by a pair of Muslims. It may have already happened in the US, with the Navy Yard shootings.

36 posted on 10/10/2013 11:27:29 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Could you imagine if we had all this crap in WW2?

So to some of the judges ilk then we would have had to got a warrant to get some of the high profile NAZIS.

The sooner some realize we are at war and there are people who wear civilian clothes who want to destroy the country and us the better


37 posted on 10/10/2013 2:58:28 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
what do you expect? napolitano supports homosexual based marriage.

He does? Wow.

I must admit, there's something about him that I've never liked.

Jesus Christ: You can’t impeach Him and He ain’t going to resign.



38 posted on 10/10/2013 3:49:07 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I was shocked when he said it on fox and friends. Then again mehgan kelly was there.


39 posted on 10/10/2013 3:54:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: manc
I do not think Mr. Napolitano was saying that at all. I think he was criticizing the comingling of civil and war-time military law.

I'm pretty sure he was pointing out that by the rules the Obama malAdministration have set for themselves (that is, treating terrorism as CRIME instead of as acts of war) an arrest warrant was needed in order for the recent snatching of this al-Libi character to be legal (once again, under the rules THEY have set for themselves).

40 posted on 10/11/2013 10:29:13 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson