Posted on 10/07/2014 4:28:44 PM PDT by Kaslin
I notice that none of them resigned in disgust while all of it was happening on their watch. Maybe they’re now trying to turn into loyal Americans rather than disloyal Obama pansies.
More like on the “left side” of Hillary.
I seem to recall that GWB’s Press Scty., Scott (something), had a book published shortly after leaving the administration. .....The book was very critical of Bush and Republicans. ...Of course his mother was running as a Dem against Perry for Gov. of Texas when his book came out.
...Clinton didn’t owe their jobs to Obama,
*********************
Clinton was given the SoS position to keep her from challenging Obama in 2012; no other reason.
Obama has no loyalty, so he inspires none.
"Cause the Sultan is going down the tubes and they want to suck up to and for Mrs. Bill.
Carole Stewart Keeton McClellan Rylander Strayhorn was Comptroller of Public Accounts.
You are recalling Scott McCleelan.
He inspires disloyalty.
I’ve heard many comments about his so-called ‘intellect’ over the years.
Frankly, I’m still waiting to be impressed.
Why so disloyal? My guess is “GUILT” since much of what the punk POTUS has done has been driven to destroy this country.
Most grass-roots Americans think these self-serving creeps who fought, lied, pandered, deceived and conned their ways to the top in the national and DC hierarchy have the same values, morals, loyalties and consciences as do most of us....but they don't.
Don't ever think for one minute that they do. They are self-seeking, self-centered, self-important lice infecting our nation's capitol and our body politic....who are still avidly scrambling to remain people of importance.
Leni
Yep. Scott McClellan. His mom was Strayhorn (the name she used when running for TX Gov.
That’s my guess.
For sure with Panetta maybe with Gates, not Clinton, they are worried. Panetta had a look of deer in the headlights with O’Reilly last night, he looks worried and fearful for our country and is saying as much as he can without causing panic.
I watched snippets of the O’Reilly interview with Panetta (the NL playoff game was on at the same time), but it seemed to me that Panetta was trying to avoid sound bites. He knew O’Reilly had read his book so couldn’t deny what he had written but was trying to state his criticisms in murkier language so they couldn’t be used as sound bites to attack Obama.
I think this is true.
I remember when Obama was first elected, they all said that he didn't know anyone in Washington, and didn't already have a team loyal to him (like the Clintons), who were ready to go.
Obama's team is really a collection of political mercenaries that he cobbled together on an as-needed basis.
-PJ
I was just thinking that...lol
You should send him that post, verbatim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.