Posted on 01/07/2015 11:30:11 AM PST by maggief
Maybe they didn’t feel like giving into the terrorists.
You would trade 12+ coworkers for one grandchild?
How about 100 coworkers? How about 100 toddlers in a day-care center?
One could design a dual code system, a normal one, and another one that would silently alert a heavily armed on premises guard to meet the “visitors.”
Non sequitur.
If only guns were banned, then there would be peace and tranquility, everywhere, all the time.
Yes
Exactly my point. The success of their plan depended on not firing a shot until they had gotten upstairs to the editorial meeting. If they had “gone loud” on the street, their primary target would have escaped, and it probably would have devolved into a running gun battle on the streets of Paris, much like what happened after they left the office.
None of us would disagree with you. I can’t imagine being in that situation.
I have a serious problem that they even had a woman at the door ....why not security since they had been threatened and even one bombing.....that’s just foolish not having security at their door and instead just a woman with a kid no less.
Heck the editor had his own security body guard so they understood the threats against them clearly.
Just poor planning on their part.
Bottom line is you insult their prophet they will come after you...
Yes... a second Charlie will need to be better armed, unless that is plain forbidden in Paris.
Give it a rest. Unarmed mom against 3 dedicated killers. If they attacked her kid, she would protect her child. On the flip side, mothers are not quite so fast to offer their child up for murder/sacrifice.
It isn’t exactly a new thing Simba.
The blame lies 100% with the murderers, not with that woman.
“Sounds like they had all the security the law allowed.”
Perhaps, but they had a very bad security PLAN with a known “weak link” (a lady returning after lunch with a toddler, who opens the door with a code.)
Being that Charlie Hebdo was a known terror target, this is inexcusable. ANYBODY with the code should not have been such an obvious “weak link.” My guess is that terrorist surveillance revealed the weak link, and their way in.
Their plan depended on getting inside and going upstairs BEFORE going loud with the AK-47s.
And it worked perfectly.
Yes...and even an alarm itself...these people knew they were targets before this and did not plan well for that.
This happening is simplythe Military Wing of Islam doing what they say they will do....for any to think they are exempt is foolish and dangerous.
You don't speak for "us."
I can, have, and made preparations for just such a situation.
And actually, if they are armed and it is known... the cowards would probably leave the office alone.
I don’t know what I would have done. What a horrible thing.
Not at all. You have admitted you would trade 12+ coworkers lives for your own and a child.
How about 20+? 50+? 100+?
At what point would you refuse? Why won’t you answer?
Islam targets are what they are.....and they really don’t need a reason to do what they do, they are wired to take out the infidel.
It was a lousy security plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.