Accusing a person who isn't armed at all times of Islamophobia is like accusing a doctor in an Ebola Treatment Unit of Ebolaphobia because they are careful about infection.
Posted on 01/07/2015 1:51:36 PM PST by PROCON
Hush Frenchies, hush now. There is nothing to see here. Back to sleep with you.
France Vote Le Pen! England Vote UKIP! look to Sweaden and start lighting up mosques! Kick Turkey out of the NATO Organization!
Does anybody have that Islamization chart?
Voltaire’s quote was the point of my post...and applies to all real Americans here.
What a very, very curious headline.
Our ancestors fought this subslime hoard 800 years ago for good reason. It is envitable it is going to happen again, and the longer we wait is to our detriment.
See post #20
This?
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
‘Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. – Leon Uris, ‘The Haj’
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
Jihad Watch & FrontPage as sources
Agreed!
A "radical" Muslim kills the infidels.
A "moderate" Muslim wants the radical Muslims to kill the infidels.
You'd get whiplash spinning your head around saying 'whaaaat?', if this wasn't so predictable. It's a pattern, Islamic maniacs murder people, the elite tell us, "don't blame Muslims".
You know what, the elites by their irresponsible blame-shifting, are actually creating the situation they (claim) to fear so much. When people's honestly held concerns are denied, dismissed and people are demonized for having those views, they're going to have no place to go, but for full on anti-Islam. Any middle of the road position is untenable.
Which European country is going to be first in shutting of Muslim immigration? Which European country is going to be first to expel Muslims? And how long will it take for this process to start? Is this latest massacre the tipping point?
A fear is only a “phobia” if it is irrational.
Accusing a person who isn't armed at all times of Islamophobia is like accusing a doctor in an Ebola Treatment Unit of Ebolaphobia because they are careful about infection.
How many people did Islamophobia kill today?
Le Monde, a French Leftist paper, published its lead editorial with the usual crap about fighting “all kinds of extremism, intolerance, etc, etc”
First comment:
ricardo uztarroz 07/01/2015 - 19h49
Que de pudeur pour ne pas désigner qui sont les vrais auteurs de ce massacre sans nom : des tenants de l’islamisme radical, des fous de dieu musulmans. Ce n’est donc pas l’ignorance, l’intolérance, l’obscurantisme ni ne le fanatisme. On peut être tout cela sans être pour autant un tueur aguerri. Ceux qui ont tué sont des islamistes radicaux. Pourquoi pas le dire? Et le dire n’implique pas qu’on fustige toute une religion et ses adeptes. Ne pas désigner l’ennemi, c’est être complice passif.
Freely translated: “What a farce to not name the authors of this massacre: the teachings of radical Islam, the fools who follow the god of the muslims. It is NOT ignorance, intolerance, nor fanaticism. You can have all those things and not be a killer. The killers are radical muslims. Why not say so...to not name the enemy is to be a passive accomplice.”
To the headline, GOOD.
The mainstream right in France needs to wake up or it will lose votes to the quasi-Nazi LePen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.