(duh - ya think so?)
Since when would Democrats have voted for Kavanaugh when he restrained his words? At the time none of them did.
And if they offended by his being angered at their throwing mud on his good name, they completely deserved it.
Its the Democrats who turned a Supreme Court nomination into a political battleground . Neither they nor their fake news media allies have standing to complain about the outcome.
If Kavanaugh is more partisan after that, it isn’t his fault. The Democrats have reaped what they sowed.
In other words, what comes around, goes around. A pox on their houses.
Good
I hope he STICKS IT to the LEFT
For a LIFETIME
Because defending yourself is “partial” and alleging is “impartial”. Lol. Welcome to modern journalism and the liberal way.
I would hope Kavanaugh would always remember these communists hard left Democrats and rule accordingly. If the Republicans cannot save America then the Court must rule according to the Constitution. Feel Good has no place in the law.
Reminds me of the logic the law enforcement use to deal with people accused of being a witch.
First of all, if you were accused of being a witch, you had to prove you were not.
They had a particular way of trussing a person up and throwing him into a body of water.
If the person floated, that was proof he was a witch and executed.
If the person drowned, he had proved he was not a witch.
Well, I don’t want a “non-partisan” judge. I want a judge that upholds the Constitution, and that by definition is a conservative. I mean, what do they think the word “conservative” means? To conserve.
So Kagan, Sotomayor and Ginsburg are impartial? Who knew?
GOOD, I hope he actually IS their worst nightmare.
Aggressive and belligerent is exactly what you deserve for this obscene display of unbounded partisan politics .
It will follow you to your grave.
To them impartial means ignoring the Constitution.
Something tells me that Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas are going to be fast friends and be voting along the same lines after what happened to both.
As if the LA Times would ever consider anyone who doesn’t vote in lockstep with the progressive bloc on the Supreme Court to be impartial.
ROFLMBO!!!!! As if the LATimes would ever think of him as anything but an enemy? The Left, including Congressional leaders, openly opposed Trump's pick BEFORE the name was announced.
Just more passive aggressive nonsense from the psychotic Left.
Complete infantile DNC moronic propaganda.
Being savaged with lies, no one is going to sit by and respond calmly?
No he did EXACTLY what any innocent man would do. The Leftist scum have been allowed far to long to throw verbal punches without a response by beta male Republicans. Those days are done.
I want a judge righteously passionate for justice.
After all this, it’s going to be hard to be impartial but he will rise to the occasion.
If they are impartial why are there so many 5/4 decisions?
Watch that be Schumer's next line: Kavanaugh must withdraw because he's now hopelessly biased against Democrats after enduring our failed smear campaign against him.
-PJ