Posted on 12/03/2018 2:31:06 PM PST by bitt
Exactly. How selfish of bitt..
“Once mamma has her anchor baby she is entitled to the full range of welfare benefits all single mothers get”
Once mamma has her anchor baby, the anchor baby is entitled to the full range of welfare benefits, including benefits for mamma.
Mamma’s hospital is also entitled to delivery benefits.
I’m not sure about pre-natal benefits, but I suspect walking into a low-income clinic with a bulging belly is good enough for full service.
“It is way past time that the US engage Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, etc., and demand to know why they are failing their citizens.”
Leftist politicians and voters
“Leftist politicians and voters”
Exactly. It’s time to call them out, and stop being the safety valve for corrupt politicians who promise the people paradise, deliver nothing, become extremely wealthy in the process, and then blame us for what they’ve caused.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s ArgumentI’ll bottom line this right now. Contrary to the Founding States constitutionally requiring Congress to publish federal government expenditures which Congress doing a lousy job of, estimates for how much undocumented Democrats are costing taxpayers a year not even close to each other, federal welfare for anybody is unconstitutional imo.
"Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time [emphases added]."
"The power to regulate manufactures, not having been confided to congress, they have no more right to act upon it, than they have to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws [emphases added], or the road laws, of the states. Congress is empowered to lay taxes for revenue, it is true; but there is no power to encourage, protect, or meddle with manufactures." —Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 2
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."—Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Taxing and spending on behalf of the poor is uniquely the 10th Amendment job of the states.
”... the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See about middle of 3rd column.)
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
So hypothetically speaking, if patriots support Pres. Trump in putting a complete stop to unconstitutional federal welfare, are we looking at Congress easily being able to build a new border wall every year if it wanted to? (Mexico will eventually pay for wall.)
Come on Bitt, these are people that just want a chance at FREEDOM! Freedom from work...freedom from responsibility....freedom from obligations!
Oh, don’t forget FREE stuff.... Freedom, they yearn for FREEdumb...
I NEVER blame these immigrants, afterall, they grew up not in a system that taught rugged individualism and to never take from the government. They have acted according to the ethics of their home country's corrupt political system.
I BLAME the US government, we the people, for this Marxist/altruist system that is self-perpetuating. Robbing Peter to pay Paul, even if you leave some money in Peter's pocket is antithetical to a Laissez-Faire system of governance.
Why are they getting anything at all? They are NOT citizens. If they cannot support themselves, why are they here? To subsist solely on the largesse of the dark pit that is FedGov?
This crap needs to stop...quick, fast, and in a hurry.
This is a major reason the wall must be built. Immigrants are now a net negative to the US.
JoMa
employers of illegals should be fined heavily.
landlords should demand birth certificates or face penalties
school systems should have the right to educate only the children who can produce a valid BC and immunization certificates.
Every person who ever answered (perhaps truthfully!) that they couldn’t be on a jury (3M in CA) because they aren’t citizens should be contacted and told that they will forfeit all property within six months if they are not exited from the US.
Aliens picked up for any infraction should bring in ICE to investigate the entire family and they should all be deported (that would cut down crime!).
Unfortunately, any rules/laws ever written in the last 50 years have been disregarded/usurped by the Great Society - false SS#s were given out like candy in the 70s so that aliens could receive services. I know that for a fact. They started with 999. Any fradulent SS# used by an illegal should bring immediate deportation. In the East, using SS#s from Puerto Rico are the gold standard..and the poor unfortunates in PR don’t know about the fraud until they are refused services for their own benefit (like after the hurricane..) Forget jailing illegals - drop them back into their former country, even if they haven’t lived there for 40 years.
Immigration laws are useless in sanctuary states/cities, and in areas where ICE CAN legally operate, ‘church’ groups hide and subsidize aliens.
NO MORE!! PLEASE, DJT, give us some relief!!!
Lets have New taxes on ‘liberals’ (triple taxation and starting to pay taxes if they dont) to support these illegal people they love so much but want others to pay for their freeloading.
Redistribute THEIR wealth to a cause they support so much.
Start housing them all in these liberals homes is another possible addition.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s ArgumentI’ll bottom line this right now. Contrary to the Founding States constitutionally requiring Congress to publish federal government expenditures which Congress doing a lousy job of, estimates for how much undocumented Democrats are costing taxpayers a year not even close to each other, federal welfare for anybody is unconstitutional imo.
"Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time [emphases added]."
"The power to regulate manufactures, not having been confided to congress, they have no more right to act upon it, than they have to interfere with the systems of education, the poor laws [emphases added], or the road laws, of the states. Congress is empowered to lay taxes for revenue, it is true; but there is no power to encourage, protect, or meddle with manufactures." —Joseph Story, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, Commentaries on the Constitution 2
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."—Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Taxing and spending on behalf of the poor is uniquely the 10th Amendment job of the states.
”... the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See about middle of 3rd column.)
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
So hypothetically speaking, if patriots support Pres. Trump in putting a complete stop to unconstitutional federal welfare, are we looking at Congress easily being able to build a new border wall every year if it wanted to? (Mexico will eventually pay for wall.)
Sorry for the repeated post.
it was worth it, lol...
I’m not going to make a practice out of it, but thanks for encouragement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.