Impeachment moves to Senate. Get ready for a scramble — and a January surprise

Washington Examiner ^ | December 16,2019 | by Byron York

[Wonder Warthog]

"I meant “Gone” in that she’ll vote for Impeachment and Removal, if it comes to that. I wouldn’t even waste any time on her."

Heh..I guess wishful thinking on my part.

[a little elbow grease]

They're at it today.

_____

Article #1 ….. Trump’s abuse of office …. Boy, these Dems are getting petty……..

They said he abused his office by putting up this picture in the oval office.

[struggle]

>>Manchin will vote with the republicans.

I think you might see Sinema too.

[Vaduz]

He just needs four.Who wants to kiss their job good by.

[rintintin]

I were McConnell, I’d go full offense and use this as an opportunity to expose the process. “

Yes that sounds like Mitch. Somebody who fights relentlessly to expose the establishment. /sarc

[Chuckster]

Romney, Collins, the clown from Alaska....

I don't know about Collins, but Romney and Murkowski would absolutely vote with the Democrats absent severe pressure from leadership and constituents, and I don't think either of them give a sh!t about their constituents.

[Always A Marine]

...a legal proceeding where no one goes to prison? Seriously?

A legal proceeding where, in his own defense, President Trump introduces evidence which incriminates his accusers. Everything they've accused Trump of doing is what they were doing themselves. He has proof, and everyone will see it.

[italianquaker]

Chucky gets zero support

[MAAG]

Thx 4 link, I am going out to buy a Roku after watching part ii and prt iii and it is your fault! LOL.(go Rudii) Part i was very informative.

[gibsonguy]

I hope you are right because it’s pretty obvious now the rats going to try to force a vote on each witness and the MSM is going all out with the “what are the republicans afraid of” spin.

[ptsal]

My Christmas present to you.
Those videos are on Youtube for free.

[richardtavor]

I agree. But it would be nice...

[usnavy_cop_retired]

McConnell got pretty close to what I have been saying for two days now.

I posted this on some other threads;

Mitch should tell Schumer;

“You know, you make a valid point that the house failed to elicit evidence to support the Articles of Impeachment and that Bolton et. al. may actually have information/evidence to support your Articles of Impeachment.

Therefor, the Senate will return the Articles of Impeachment to the House as “incomplete” with a demand that they provide the Senate with a complete record for impeachment, to include the testimony from the witnesses you have identified.

That will, of course, require that the House allow the president and the witnesses to avail of their rights to bring the dispute to the courts for a definitive decision on the privileges claimed.

When they have done that the senate will accept the revised Articles of impeachment.

However, if you do not agree that my proposal is fair, reasonable but you instead declare it to be unacceptable to you and your caucus, then, the Senate will proceed with the trial, allow PDJT to present his fact witnesses and witnesses to impeach the house witnesses along with any documents he wishes to present to the “court”. The House witness statements that are not ruled inadmissible because of hearsay will be read into the record and the Senate will then vote on impeachment of PDJT.”

CHECKMATE!!!!