What are odds that that was the order of the polling they withheld, but not the same percentages?
Geez, to watch these two weenies and their campaign ads here in California, you would think they were leading the pack. Not sure what's worse, Steyer the hedge fund hack referring to Mr. Trump as "the criminal in the White House" or Mini-Mike telling us how he intends to bring back Obamacare on his first day in office, with 0blamer singing his praises.
What a couple of putzes!
If you believe those results are legitimate, you’re dumber than a Millennial Leftist.
If you use the latest PravdaNews to look for the Iowa Caucus results, it will show Buttigieg leading slightly over Sanders, like this...
SDE's
564 26.2% Buttigieg
562 26.1% Sanders
387 18.0% Warren
341 15.8% Biden
264 12.3% Klobuchar
Reference: www.nytimes.com/.../results-iowa-caucus.html
The DNC refuses to list the "Popular Vote" any longer, because Bernie was getting too much traction from that data. So they spent days recalculating how to come up with some OTHER statistic that would favor MayorCheat and Biden. The new (and ONLY) "result" they flaunt now is SDE's, (state delegates) which they jiggered to make it favor their "good guys"
But ALL the raw data from ALL precincts (100% reporting) is available here...
results.thecaucuses.org
(you'd better save that page quickly, because the DNC will hide it soon)
In a half-dozen precincts, I checked that table versus what had originally been reported on social media, and it looks legit. If you select ALL the raw data, from all the precincts and crunch just the Final votes (the popular vote), you will get this...
Popular-Vote
45826 26.6% Sanders
43195 25.0% Buttigieg
34771 20.2% Warren
23691 13.7% Biden
21181 12.3% Klobuchar
Sanders has beaten MayorCheat by 2631 votes in Iowa, which is 1.6 percentage points, and outside the margin of error for automatic recounts in normal elections
Have the Broward county ballots been found yet?
Pete Buttigieg: 564 (26.2%) Bernie Sanders: 562 (26.1%) Elizabeth Warren: 387 (18.0%) Joe Biden: 3 41 (15.8%) Amy Klobuchar: 264 (12.3%) Andrew Yang: 22 (1.0%) Tom Steyer: 7 (0.3%) Michael Bloomberg: 0 (0.0%) Tulsi Gabbard: 0 ( 0.0%)
Tulsi didn’t get even one (1) vote. I find that hard to believe.
Michael Bloomberg: 0 (0.0%) -— No where to go but sideways!
And funniest of all is that Elizabeth Warren placed 5th in the voting in Pocahontas County, Iowa. Couldn’t even carry her home county.
I am not sure the general electorate will ever truly swallow a Buttigieg candidacy. I think the Dems know they are blowing it. They can’t cram a Buttigieg down the throats of voters.
I don’t believe these numbers for a second. Definitely manipulated to push Bernie down to 2nd and get Quid-Pro-Joe over the 15% threshold. This is just the beginning, the cheating in November is going to be massive, turnout for Trump & R’s has to be even more massive to overcome.
Bloomberg and Tulsi are tied at 0.0! It’s neck and neck in a photo finish! LOL :-)
So petie and bernie are neck and neck. Angry lizzy is way behind. Touchy-feely Joe is even lower. Bloomy is out of the picture as is Tulsi.
Lizzy must be steaming! She thought he had a right to the nomination, and this newcomer from Indiana beats her!
On some of the votes there were more people the second vote than the first... which should NOT be possible. I’m guessing democrats did their usual voter fraud bit so they could stop Bernie from taking first place.
As a twofer the democrat establishment always wanted to knock Iowa out of first place... so they’ll blame Iowa for their screw up...
That’s slightly less credible than the 1985 WWF Manager of the Year balloting when Hillybilly Jim pledged his votes to Captain Lou Albano, securing the honor to The Captain.
That list reminds me of the scene from Animal House;
Mr. Blutarsky 0.0%
They’re lying.
I came in first.