Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buttigieg still supports expanding Supreme Court, defends Biden claim that Barrett nom is 'unconstitutional'
Faux News ^ | October 18, 2020 | Ronn Blitzer

Posted on 10/18/2020 9:06:08 AM PDT by Navy Patriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Navy Patriot

Here’s what Biden is doing. He knows that Dems are voting now so he wants to hint that he’ll go with packing. He says that he won’t say until the GOP takes its vote and that his decision will depend on whether they do the right thing. The Dem core assumes that means he’ll go with packing if they approve Barrett. But on election day he’ll announce that no, packing would be a bad idea. By then most Dems will have already voted and so he’ll only need to pander to the GOP voters. Then of course once the election is over he will pack the court anyway.


21 posted on 10/18/2020 9:30:41 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abbastanza

It is an outrages thing to do. There is question they are greasing the skids to actually do this and they will. But is is not unconstitutional.


22 posted on 10/18/2020 9:32:02 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
Pete, no one cares what you think. You couldn’t even run a little Midwestern city. Shut up.

That's Why he has no credibility.

23 posted on 10/18/2020 9:33:18 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Isn’t Buttplug the criminal home invader?


24 posted on 10/18/2020 9:34:26 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Fudge packing, court packing ... so what. Packing is packing.


25 posted on 10/18/2020 9:35:08 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20
Is he really that ignorant/stupid about the Constitution? I guess so.

Maybe. Or he believes that the Constitution is a "living document" so it can mean whatever they want.

26 posted on 10/18/2020 9:35:36 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“””and defended the Democratic presidential nominee’s claim that the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett is unconstitutional.””””

He is correct. I read the Constitution and it clearly says that no REPUBLICAN President can do anything unless the media and democrats( same thing) say it is ok.

It says that right next to the part that says abortion is a womans right.


27 posted on 10/18/2020 9:42:48 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

The next CIA cypher!


28 posted on 10/18/2020 9:44:47 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

The fudge packer can’t get enough packing...


29 posted on 10/18/2020 9:47:41 AM PDT by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“Buttigieg still supports expanding Supreme Court, defends Biden claim that Barrett nom is ‘unconstitutional’”

So is he saying that the Supreme Court can rule on matters that directly affect them? Seems that way, since that’s the body that determines the constitutionality of actions that take place in government.

So that’s good to hear from a Democrat and it obviously then means that the Supreme Court can rule on a politically-driven expansion of the Court.


30 posted on 10/18/2020 9:47:58 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

The Dem primary losers have to weigh in on weighty matters.


31 posted on 10/18/2020 9:48:00 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

All elected Democrats are either constitutional morons or lawless Constitution hating scum.


32 posted on 10/18/2020 9:49:34 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

He should name his political action committee “ButtPac.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You win the internet for today.


33 posted on 10/18/2020 9:52:26 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents|Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Put a plug in it Petey...!

Oh yeah, he already did...


34 posted on 10/18/2020 9:54:44 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

He grew up reading that children’s book

Alfred E Neuman has two Constitutions


35 posted on 10/18/2020 9:59:19 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Joe Biden- "First thing I'd do is repeal those Trump tax cuts." (May 4th, 2019)l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Why does he get so much airtime on Flox?


36 posted on 10/18/2020 10:02:53 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Why is the sword brown?


37 posted on 10/18/2020 10:06:41 AM PDT by null and void (Don't piss off old people. The older we get the less 'life in prison' is a deterent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell
*oh!* nvrmnd...
38 posted on 10/18/2020 10:07:16 AM PDT by null and void (Don't piss off old people. The older we get the less 'life in prison' is a deterent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

And their idiot followers swallow it hook, line and sinker.


39 posted on 10/18/2020 10:09:06 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (A vote for Joe Biden is a vote for empty smirking pantsuit Kamala Harris for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Once, just once, I’d like to hear one these a**holes be asked what is unconstitutional about the appointment and confirmation of Judge (Justice) Barrett. Every single time they are allow to spew the absolute lies about the process without being required to prove what they say, reinforces the perception that the process is being corrupted.

Let’s wait and see how many of those “women” supporting, Democrat senators vote for her conformation. Probably none because they were embarrassed by her ability to correct there voluminous notes and diatribes without having to look at a single piece of information. Her brilliance put them to shame (if they were capable of shame).


40 posted on 10/18/2020 10:14:42 AM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson