Posted on 08/20/2022 5:34:55 AM PDT by PK1991
“1. BlackRock
BlackRock is a well-respected giant in the world of hedge funds, often talked about on the world’s leading financial media, and founded by moguls including Larry Fink, Susan Wagner, Robert S. Kapito, and others.
The hedge fund firm has grown to become so large that its assets under management can’t be measured in billions; it has about $9.5 trillion in assets on its books.
The firm was originally founded as a risk management and fixed-income institutional asset management firm, but with massive success in financial markets, it grew to become the world’s largest fund manager.
While the company manages a long list of hedge funds, it also offers a wide range of index funds and passively managed investing portfolios for the general public, which has helped the firm amass such a high AUM.”
Black rock just lost a ton of money. Let them. Keep pumping that bubble fools
Land Use Planning agencies.
What you currently see in America is Mussolini’s vision of Fascism: Government and Corporations working together to control everything (for themselves of course).
It was practiced right here in United States of America before WWII. That is what made it the richest country in the world. Now it is burdened with socialism and high taxes.
Big business got BIG because government has their hands on the neck of small business. Most small buinesses cannot afford a battery of tax attorneys and CPA accountants. That is why the onerous regulations are tough on them.
It is not a hedge fund. It’s a normal investment management company - the massive overwhelming majority of the money they manage are in index funds and the vast majority of the rest is in actively managed mutual funds. A hedge fund is a very different beast.
Rents go up because landlords must now factor in the possibility of eviction moratoriums. I would expect rents to pretty much double for that reason.
Plain ignorance is no excuse for your dredging up a ridiculous self esteem enhancing drivel
Live in Dallas city limit, not the suburbs not semi rural. Not sure of other factors - $350,000 house 20% down mtg $1750 v $2360 rent 15 minutes away.
Sorry rent $2630.
No, it's like going to Goodwill and finding them cleaned out and the lady at the register is referring desperately naked people to a "clothes flipper" who charges Neiman Marcus prices for unfashionable clothes. Perhaps you don't know how analogies work, or maybe you were just shit talking.
They might be priced out of certain markets that are currently popular and in high demand. But if they are willing to drive a little further, or take a chance in a more marginal area, there are still tons of deals.
So, you DO believe in infinite supply, just as I accused.
And plus as several people have already mentioned here, you don’t have to start with a “home”, you can start with a condo. The point is to get into something you “own” no matter what it is, as soon as possible. As soon as you do that you will have extra money (the difference between what you new house payment is and what your rent was) That extra money will allow you save up for the next down payment much faster and easier. You move out of your original place and rent that out and into you new place. It’s always easier to get a loan on something you will be living in. So you just jump from place to place, living in each along the way and stepping up each time and renting out the one you left.
Again, the people being squeezed out of the buyer's market ARE trying to buy "as soon as possible", yet you continue to respond as though you actually champion home ownership. Do you have language comprehension difficulties, or were you trying to deceive?
Yeah they do.
Those who think that are certifiable.
No I'm not.
Our grandparents built their homes on land in the country outside of the large cities (the cities grew over time and engulfed them).
Their homes were small wooden 2 bedroom 1 bath homes on blocks with no AC and no appliances.
When you are unable to find an affordable home that fits that description, then I will start having sympathy for you.
Well, perhaps a super-rich resource hoarder will someday fund the time travel breakthrough which will allow him to travel back in time and relentlessly out bid your grandparents, creating an alternate reality in which you understand basic economics.
So why are “they” buying up all those rental properties?
Who will be the renters if population is reduced?
I understand that if you want something affordable that doesn’t exist, you simply look in a different area and if needed build it yourself.
But people like you think they are entitled to a fully furnished McMansion straight out of college in the hippest, newest part of town. And don’t care to hear about how others older than you had to do without for many years.
Go to ANY small town outside of the big cities ANYWHERE and both land and homes are very affordable.
Self enhancing???
Yet another liberal troll outed on FR
And if you want to live in an established neighborhood, maybe send your kids to a school you prefe?. Or, if you don’t want to commute from a rural area?
No shit I know I can build, have done it before.
Because why not.
Who will be the renters if population is reduced?
Plenty of people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.