Skip to comments.
Federal Court Cancels Hearing Over Trump Election Lawyer’s Attempt to Reclaim Seized Phone After DOJ Obtains SECOND Search Warrant
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^
| 8/30/2022
| Christina Laila
Posted on 08/30/2022 10:07:45 AM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
08/30/2022 10:07:45 AM PDT
by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2
posted on
08/30/2022 10:07:57 AM PDT
by
bitt
( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
To: bitt
3
posted on
08/30/2022 10:10:17 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(Cooler King Joe, killing a winning nation every day. )
To: bitt
Am I misunderstanding? They grabbed the phone with a potentially bogus warrant? But then — after they grabbed the phone — they went and got a second warrant. So that makes it all OK?
4
posted on
08/30/2022 10:11:38 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(We are already in a revolutionary period, and the Rule of Law means nothing. )
To: bitt
No one is allowed to Stop The Steal.
The criminals take over and make sure no one apprehends them.
5
posted on
08/30/2022 10:11:53 AM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: bitt
Judge Robert Brack, a George W. Bush appointee wrote
Lets start being hones.....Judge Robert Brack, a globalist/UNIPARTY/NWO appointee that will and is doing the bidding of his masters in an attempt, any attempt to find something on Donald J Trump.
6
posted on
08/30/2022 10:12:35 AM PDT
by
qaz123
To: bitt
Was the phone seized BEFORE the 2ND WARRANT WAS ISSUED?
7
posted on
08/30/2022 10:13:02 AM PDT
by
House Atreides
(I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX!)
To: bitt
Only one thing will end this criminal gooberment.
I’m ready for it. Not just to watch though.
8
posted on
08/30/2022 10:13:29 AM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
To: bitt
I thought you weren’t allowed to just try to get another warrant if you took something without a warrant?
To: All
“The beatings will continue until ... “
10
posted on
08/30/2022 10:15:39 AM PDT
by
rayincolorado
("Those who forget the past, are condemned to repeat it ...")
To: bitt
"judge continued, “The undersigned will take the Government at its word......"
Once fooled can happen to anyone. Three hundred and seven times fooled takes a federal judge who earns six figures to be a completely corrupt puppet. Nobody is that stupid.
11
posted on
08/30/2022 10:16:18 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(Cooler King Joe, killing a winning nation every day. )
To: nickcarraway
Yeah, I’m pretty sure that is not how things are supposed to work in this country. You screw up a warrant, and everything you seized is inadmissible, no matter if you get a “good” warrant later on.
To: bitt
13
posted on
08/30/2022 10:19:10 AM PDT
by
mware
To: bitt
Trump can afford to get every new model of iPhone and probably does. His January 6th phone has probably been given to charity after getting scrubbed.
And I thought the government was concerned with presidential documents.
To: bitt
The heart of the matter is that the government continues to go after Trump’s attorneys and his attorney client privilege. They did that with Michael Cohen, they did that with the illegal warrant to raid Mara-Lago, and they did that with Eastman’s phone and emails. There is a clear pattern here.
15
posted on
08/30/2022 10:21:09 AM PDT
by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: ClearCase_guy
16
posted on
08/30/2022 10:22:38 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: qaz123
Confirmed on voice vote in 2003.
That means The Senate Club loved Bobby Braaaap.
17
posted on
08/30/2022 10:23:49 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Boogieman
There is inevitable Discovery but I think that’s something different.
To: Sequoyah101
A nice decapitation would be nice
19
posted on
08/30/2022 10:24:10 AM PDT
by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!you)
To: ClearCase_guy; bitt; blackdog; House Atreides; Regulator; qaz123; nickcarraway; rayincolorado
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.
It sounds like the DOJ seized the phone. After the fact, when asked to produce the warrant, they could not find it.
So they got a second warrant after the fact, and...that makes it all okay because "the judge takes them at their word"???
Do I have that right?
How could that not stand up to a legal challenge, if I interpret it correctly?????
What would stop any agency from seizing property without a warrant, pawing through it to look for things, then saying "we can't find the warrant" but using what they found in their seizure and search to fill in the blanks for something specific?
This stinks to high heaven, if I interpret that correctly.
20
posted on
08/30/2022 10:25:26 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson