So what would be a remedy?
The constitution is a law - the 1st A says government can’t limit speech.
The government did limit speech and thus broke the law.
The perps need to be arrested and charged.
Some (many) will plead guilty - they are proving the case.
Then the courts (Maybe SJC) can order remedy, which could be a new election Trump v Biden with Biden under impeachment while running.
The Constitution does not have clear rules set forth on fraudulent elections. The best you can interpret is that it’s left to the electoral college. But a massive fraud of this type ALLOWS for ignoring all rules, whether any exist in the Constitution or not, and we cannot allow this. I think that’s what he meant. The leftist scum was just looking for something to hold on to after getting whacked by Elon and their cozy relationship with Twitter before an election. The Constitution didn’t take into account the pure scum one party would become and the fact people who are supposed to enforce laws look the other way.
The only legal remedies are public protests, and for Congress to impeach and remove a President who cheated. There’s no other remedy, certainly not one which includes “terminating” of “all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution”.
There was massive and widespread vote fraud, especially in the several contested states.
There was massive and widespread deception propagated by tech and the media.
It all lead to a stolen presidential election and control of the Congress by the (increasing numbers of) communists in our country.
And, since it was unprecedented in scale and outcome, he was also right to posit several questions. Namely, what now? How is the wrong, righted?
He was also absolutely correct to state that our great founders would never condone such a blatant, in our faces evil attack on our Republic.
The legacy media, which arguable includes Breitbart writer(s) now, is always going to spin something Trump says because they hate him and what he stands for, with an unbridled evil passion.
I said, early on, that THIS KIND OF FRAUD HAS NEVER HAPPENED.
There would have to be MAJOR CHANGES...IN THE LAW, IN THE CONGRESS’ TREATMENT OF THE FRAUD, IN THE THOUGHTFUL AND CAREFULLY CRAFTED SOLUTIONS TO THE FRAUD AND YES,
Call me foolish, but I even said the Constitution will have to be amended someway in order to prevent this kind of thing happening again.
Unless he is calling for revolution in some kind of code this statement is out of bounds. To answer lawlessness with lawlessness is to incite revolution. That is probably becoming our only resort though. It is the little secret being whispered in many conversations I Imagine. Either we are wrong and elections have not been stolen or if we are right and liberty is fading away fast.
Justice is intentionally moving too slowly to prevent damage if they move at all and that too is intentional. Elections that are so clearly suspect are a crisis and should be addressed as such and immediately; this is not happening as we all know. The lawlessness of the gooberment needs to be answered and Jefferson had the right idea for it. Who will lead and how?
A gooberment holding power, expressed or unintended, granted by the people against the will of the people is what we are seeing. Not just here but in France, Canada, Germany and so on. Warnings by the gooberments against the people protesting the gooberment are tyranny in action and have no relationship to liberty. I would say the gooberment is gasping but they have all the guns, money and power now.
At some point we have to be willing to confront unchecked power. If not we are willing to become slaves to tyranny. Maybe Trump is at that point of confrontation? Maybe we all should be.