Trump Indictment Document

https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf ^

[lapsus calami]

 

 

It doesn’t matter if the charges are bogus, have no basis in law, etc. What matters is that this is a NYC prosecutor and court and the law is what they decide it to be. One can be convicted in a kangaroo court just the same as in a real court. Trump won’t beat these charges until they get appealed all the way up the NY system and they get into the federal courts. His only hope is to get it into federal court, and even then it will take a couple of appeals to settle it. The dems own the justice system.

 

They're experts at it around that place like no other. It's an institution there, with centuries of experience.

 

 

[rolling_stone]

http://www.newyorklegalethics.com/letters-of-engagement-are-now-mandatory/

seems like it is the attorney’s responsibiility to sign a retainer agreement not the client..

[Williams]

That is correct.
My point is the Trump ledger entry has to be false.
I think the prosecutor wants to argue this was “really” a payment to Stormy Daniels.
Or even just that it wasn’t a “retainer”.

I don’t think the ledger entry was false just because it used the word “retainer”. It was in fact a payment to Cohen, not to Daniels.

[rolling_stone]

i dont know how prosecutor comes to conclusion it was false..he needs to explain that..

[rolling_stone]

it was said elsewhere trump resigned from his businesses..but the indictment charges:

The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,
with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission
thereof, MADE AND CAUSED A FALSE ENTRY in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, a Donald J.
Trump Revocable Trust Account check and check stub dated February 14, 2017, bearing check
number 000138, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.

UPON RESEARCH ONE OF THE ENTITIES DONALD TRUMP RESIGNED FROM JANUARY 19 2017, WAS THE DONALD J TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST (SEE LAST PAGE EXHIBIT A 3rd from bottom)HOW COULD HE HAVE MADE THE ENTRY, ANY Witnesses??????

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3404759/DJT-Resignation-Signature-Page-With-Exhibit-a.pdf

[rolling_stone]

he law relating to false imprisonment classifies affidavits, informations and indictments into "void" and "voidable." The "void" class includes those setting forth facts which in no conceivable form can constitute a criminal offense; or if they might constitute an offense, the court issuing the process had no jurisdiction over such offense or the person charged with the offense. The "voidable" class includes those where a bona fide attempt has been made to charge a possible offense under the statute, but by reason of some defect or irregularity such charge is per se insufficient in law. As to such "voidable" complaint, or "voidable" processes issued thereon there can be no false imprisonment per se.

https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2982&context=clevstlrev

[woodpusher]

DERSHOWITZ - My legal analysis of the indictment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqJquS0X3aU&ab_channel=TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz

My legal analysis of the indictment

The Dershow With Alan Dershowitz
Apr 4, 2023

31m:16s

[xzins]

Just because I have a car restored in late 2016 doesn’t mean I don’t pay for it in 2017.

There was no crime. If President Trump actually HAD spent campaign money on the stormy daniels case THAT would have been a campaign finance violation. He did not spend campaign money. He spent his OWN money on the Daniels Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). An NDA is perfectly legal.

[Varsity Flight]

Their motive was the Plea Bargain. Attempting a fishing guilt.

Not gonna happen.

Now they’re going to fish fish and fish and micro fish.

We’re voting Trump before this

And millions more now because of this.