Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact check explores presidential authority to declassify
American Bar Association ^ | 10/24/22 | American Bar Association

Posted on 06/08/2023 5:44:40 PM PDT by tarpit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: ConservativeInPA

EXACTLY


21 posted on 06/08/2023 6:15:37 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

Funny (not) how no had a problem with Carter blurting out about our Stealth technology in a speech to bolster his appearance as strong on defense. Dems can declassify something simply by thought but Pubs can’t??


22 posted on 06/08/2023 6:15:51 PM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“In all cases, however, a formal procedure is required so governmental agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions memorialized. ”

Outright lies

But the ABA was started as and remains a communist organization


23 posted on 06/08/2023 6:17:40 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

IIRC——GENERAL SERVICES PACKED UP BOXES & MOVED THEM TO MAR A LAGO.

TRUMP DIDN’T HANDLE ANY OF THAT.


24 posted on 06/08/2023 6:18:14 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“PART 2000—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES [RESERVED]
PART 2001—CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION”

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2005-title32-vol6/xml/CFR-2005-title32-vol6-subtitleB-chapXX.xml

Because of the “[RESERVED]” I’m not sure if this is operational law.


25 posted on 06/08/2023 6:21:04 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Oh c’mon. We need to act like our hair is on fire.


26 posted on 06/08/2023 6:22:46 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Yes the deep state is really starting to unravel. And everything they do falls apart. This is all part of the plan to show the public how utterly corrupt the entire government is. Its starting to work. Things keep moving faster every week now.


27 posted on 06/08/2023 6:23:10 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
“designated officials”

Yes, designated by the Originating Authority, the PRESIDENT. That ruling applied to everyone else except him.

28 posted on 06/08/2023 6:26:09 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

Thank you. I was just looking for that. The big pa of the case will center on “intention” and timing. Was the intent to declassify and was that intention before or after he left office. In the later he was no longer president and such protection is irrelevant. Was the intention to deceive? Despite the conjecture and postering of everybody who thinks they know, we simply have to wait and see what the case is really about, what evidence the prosecutor thinks they can prove, and then watch as it all unfolds.


29 posted on 06/08/2023 6:26:10 PM PDT by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“According to initial media reports, the DOJ has filed an indictment consisting of seven counts.”

“Model Prosecution” memo analyzes those six federal crimes in depth [1]:

Retention of National Defense Information (18 U.S.C. § 793(e))
Concealing Government Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)
Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)
Criminal Contempt (18 U.S.C. § 402)
False Statements to Federal Investigators (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
Other violations maybe:
7.Dissemination (18 U.S.C. §§ 798 and 793(e))
8.Unlawfully removed classified documents from the White House (18 U.S.C. § 1924)

[1] Model Prosecution Memo for Trump Classified Documents (justsecurity.org)


30 posted on 06/08/2023 6:28:57 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

Every other person in office has to abide by those laws, but not the president.


31 posted on 06/08/2023 6:29:44 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“ABA Legal Fact Check notes”??

The ABA does NOT MAKE LAW! Nor Interpret Law!

The ABA is collection, with many Leftist Layers.

They are a part of the DC Establishment.

Many Lawyers are not members of the ABA (like the AMA, for doctors).


32 posted on 06/08/2023 6:31:21 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born but a State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Again the charges are filed in Miami where the alleged crime occurred. The distinction may center on was he president or was he an ex-president. But again, everything is conjecture until we learn what the prosecutor is alleging to have occurred.


33 posted on 06/08/2023 6:32:44 PM PDT by tarpit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“In all cases, however, a formal procedure is required so governmental agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions memorialized. A federal appeals court in a 2020 Freedom of Information Act case, New York Times v. CIA, underscored that point: “Declassification cannot occur unless designated officials follow specified procedures,” the court said.”

Even though President Trump had the power as president to declassify whatever, should he do that without going through the process? How will involved departments know how to move forward if they don’t even know what is declassified? How would assets know if they need to watch out if their involvement is no longer protected?

I don’t know that saying he can declassify with his mind does him any good. President Trump would be better served to show that he went through the appropriate steps in order to safeguard the country’s secrets, which even some msm have admitted he did.


34 posted on 06/08/2023 6:33:12 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

“In all cases, however, a formal procedure is required so governmental agencies know with certainty what has been declassified and decisions memorialized. ”

If a defense contractor is working on a top secret program it may be inadvisable to notify the contractor that a secret document has been declassified.


35 posted on 06/08/2023 6:33:48 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

Do we trust the ultra leftists at the ABA?


36 posted on 06/08/2023 6:33:56 PM PDT by Tzimisce ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

He doesn’t even need to make an executive order because it is for himself. He has no need or requirement to order himself. Now, if he wanted to change it for others, he certainly can do that, but generally executive orders instruct an organization to come up with a process within some given criteria of the executive order. (Large organizations of all types really suck when it comes to getting simple stuff done. When an entity within the Executive Branch writes policy and procedures it often quotes the power that authorizes them to do so. To me that’s almost anti-American since it lacks all autonomy and individualism, as in rugged individualism. Government employees are neither rugged or individualistic. They are piece of chit pussies incapable of making it in the private sector on their own.)


37 posted on 06/08/2023 6:34:32 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ("How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked. "Two ways," Mike said. "Gradually and then suddenly." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

“Despite the conjecture and postering of everybody who thinks they know, we simply have to wait and see what the case is really about, what evidence the prosecutor thinks they can prove, and then watch as it all unfolds.”

Exactly. We don’t even know the charges.


38 posted on 06/08/2023 6:35:13 PM PDT by CrazyCatChick (DEATH POKE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Duhhh!

Hillary was NEVER PRESIDENT.


39 posted on 06/08/2023 6:35:35 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born but a State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“CFR” means Code of Federal Regulations. Regulations, not law. For law, you need to look at United States Code (USC).


40 posted on 06/08/2023 6:36:26 PM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson