Posted on 02/18/2024 11:52:28 AM PST by House Atreides
Because those stupid deals are still in force and are still hurting us now, and there are still Freepers defending them, which contradicts what you posted. There is nothing wrong with pointing that out.
I (Berlin_Freeper) posted : On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas.
And on China, I proved you wrong.
So I politely replied: Did some? I didn’t see anything like that. To which you then went from many to some: OK, here are some going back to 2005.
Some ARTICLES. The MANY was is reference to the Freepers who supported those deals.
But really all you showed was one and your keyword link didn't even work. So really you only discredited yourself.
The links works fine. It's not my fault you don't know how the search works.
Is there another issue you have against many Freepers with loads of caveats I should avoid so as not to disrupt your important day?
You never did point out what those caveats were.
Because those stupid deals are still in force and are still hurting us now, and there are still Freepers defending them, which contradicts what you posted. There is nothing wrong with pointing that out.You didn't contradict anything I posted since I asked did some people post like that after you claimed "many" but then only gave a single guy who crapped up your New Years Day with a single sentence. No wonder as I posted that I haven't seen that.
And on China, I proved you wrong.You didn't prove me wrong. You proved yourself wrong by failing to provide "many" examples. If there were many then you would not be giving me a couple of links from 20 years ago - LoL!
Some ARTICLES. The MANY was is reference to the Freepers who supported those deals.You failed to show many.
The links works fine. It's not my fault you don't know how the search works.Show me a single person in your links supporting goods from China other than the one guy named bert who posted a single sentence.
You never did point out what those caveats were.After claiming "many" and then giving me a couple of links going back 20 years to "prove" it... I have to ask why do you post like a desperate scoundrel while talking about my credibility?
Your links show people posting against China, not for. You proved yourself wrong because there are not "many" as you claimed.
Speaking of credibility show me where I said there wasn't any. Since that is what you are moaning about. I simply asked if some did and you showed me only one not many. The "many" in your links are posting against China. So it's really weird how you hate on FR considering you are showing the opposite of what you falsely claim.
Courtesy ping to bert: bert you crapped up TwelveOfTwenty's New Years Day by being a cheapo and two months later he is crying to me about it because I posted:
On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas. Putin Stooge.So how about you babysit him online?
I posted three other links with Freepers defending the trade deals. You can't refute that so of course you dance around it.
You didn't prove me wrong. You proved yourself wrong by failing to provide "many" examples.
I shouldn't have to teach you how search works, but if you review all of the articles that came up just by searching for "freetraitors", you would see articles and posts going from 2003 to recently. I'm sure anyone who is following this thread is capable of doing that, so you should try so you can see what they are seeing.
If there were many then you would not be giving me a couple of links from 20 years ago - LoL!
This was debated around 20 years ago. Of course few are defending those trade deals now, seeing what they've done to the country.
Show me a single person in your links supporting goods from China other than the one guy named bert who posted a single sentence.
I shouldn't have to do this either, but since this task is clearly above your abilities, here you are.
Does Wal Mart Mislead On What It Imports From China?
Post 2, "And the reason that I should lay awake nights worrying about what Wal-Mart imports is???"
Post 5, "Maybe. Why do I care? Is it illegal? Immoral? Unconstitutional? Would I get a better deal otherwise?"
Post 9, "yeah whatever....just go ahead and bash WalMart. This is how the world works and I kind of like the low prices myself...."
Post 30, "but the pseudo communists always come out of the woodwork in a WalMart thread...." (you have to follow the thread to get this one).
Post 33, this person turned out to be a prophet, "It is gonna be interesting when we need to make tanks to fight the Chinese? We have exported our manufacturing base."
Post 56, "Why is this even important? Why should we care what % of their inventory they import whether it be from China or any other country?"
Post 79, "Translation: I won't answer this because my answer would call for protectionism and this would lead to another debacle along the lines of that which occurred when Smoot-Hawley was enacted to "fix" the economy in the 1930's."
Post 94, in reply to post 79 above, "That sums up the mindset of the Wal-Mart bashing brigade here."
China June trade surplus swells five-fold
Post 255, "Why should I pay higher prices for any item, just to satisfy someone else's concept of fair trade."
Post 287, "This applies to the anti-free traders also. USA - we've got ours, screw you. No you can't have access to our markets, we want to keep you poor."
Post 301, "So far I have been accused of being a communist chinese plant to influence Free Republic for taking the free trade position. (So far) Now Free Trade advocates are being lumped with the Islamofacists? I'm building quite the resume!"
Apart from this, you'd have to follow the threads within the article to see the support for the trade deals with China.
I have more than proven my point. I don't intend to waste any more time doing your research for you.
After claiming "many" and then giving me a couple of links going back 20 years to "prove" it... I have to ask why do you post like a desperate scoundrel while talking about my credibility?
You've spent the past few posts trying to show a contraction between "many Freepers supported the free trade deals" and posting "some articles" from the many that came up in that one search, but there isn't any contradiction. That alone is enough to cast doubt on your credibility.
Speaking of credibility show me where I said there wasn't any.
On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas. Putin Stooge.
Would you like to change it to say "it is possible to side with China"? You know, like a caveat or something?
Courtesy ping to bert: ...So how about you babysit him online?
Oh the irony. After insisting that many Freepers did not defend those trade deals, you run and hide behind someone who did by calling my comments about the damage these trade deals have caused us as "Balderdascious Neo isolationist drivel".
It was many at this forum who supported sending our manufacturing, technology, and money to China so they could save a few penniesto "some"...
The comments are where you'll see some Freepers defending the trade deals.So I don't know why you felt the need to keep proving me correct but thanks.
I shouldn't have to do this either, but since this task is clearly above your abilities, here you are.You included posts by the same person (while hiding the names of the posters), as well as a post against trade with China.
I have more than proven my point. I don't intend to waste any more time doing your research for you.Yes, you proved that "some" ("The comments are where you'll see some Freepers defending the trade deals.") people posted siding with China. Almost twenty years ago. Not "many" as you first claimed.
You've spent the past few posts trying to show a contraction between "many Freepers supported the free trade deals" and posting "some articles" from the many that came up in that one search, but there isn't any contradiction. That alone is enough to cast doubt on your credibility.Excuse me. But you first posted "many" and then "some". So you are showing "some" of the "many"... but the many are actually posting against China. So at most you are citing some of the some. Which is why I asked: were there some?
You could have saved yourself a lot of trouble by simply agreeing with me there were some. Speaking of credibility show me where I said there wasn't any.Thanks for quoting. It's ridiculous that you got your button pushed over me saying it's impossible.On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas. Putin Stooge.
Would you like to change it to say "it is possible to side with China"? You know, like a caveat or something?
On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas. Putin Stooge.So let me explain this in simple words for you and those in Rio Linda. Here is your caveat: It is not possible to support China, like the Putin Stooge I posted to on this forum supporting Russia, not by American Christian Conservatives who Love America.
You should have given some simple basic thought to who and what I posted instead of your idiotic knee-jerk reaction and agreed with me. Oh the irony. After insisting that many Freepers did not defend those trade deals, you run and hide behind someone who did by calling my comments about the damage these trade deals have caused us as "Balderdascious Neo isolationist drivel".
Insisting? I asked you if there were some. Then you proved me correct that there were some as opposed to the many posting against China. This was debated around 20 years ago. Of course few are defending those trade deals now, seeing what they've done to the country.
I see, now there are a few. You mean one cheap guy named bert who has you flash-back triggered.
So since there are now a "few" and I am posting about currently, not twenty years ago, you have even furthewr proved me correct because this Forum was not for those some.
Do you have another knee-jerk nonsensical (I was posting to a Putin Stooge on this forum after all) button I can push?
Because you destroyed your credibility on this one.
On this American Christian Conservative Forum, We Love America and it is impossible to be sided with KGB Putin, China, North Korea, Iran and Hamas. Putin Stooge.So you are saying that it is possible for people who love America to side with China.Would you like to change it to say "it is possible to side with China"? You know, like a caveat or something?
No, I've been calling them "free traitors", and I didn't make that term up which should tell you that I'm not the only one who sees this.
So I don't know why you felt the need to keep proving me correct but thanks.
No, I was pointing out that many at this forum supported the trade deals with China, which not only went against everything we claim to believe in but had the effect of building up their military and infrastructure at the expense of ours.
You're rebuttal is that I'm wrong on that, and when I post articles and links to many more showing just that, you try to force a contraction between many Freepers and some articles.
You included posts by the same person
Right. All of the posts defending the trade deals were from one person who on many occasions replied to their own posts agreeing with them. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
(while hiding the names of the posters),
Nonsense. I posted the links and the post numbers, so anyone who was interested could look them up to see who posted each.
as well as a post against trade with China. Kinda like a desperate scoundrel would do.
Yeah, I thought that post deserved to be recognized for accurately predicting 19 years ago what we would be facing now. I said that when I included the post.
considering I posted to a Putin Stooge on this forum. You know the forum I said is for American Christian Conservatives who Love America:
If I took your comments out of context, then I'll say mia culpa and move on.
But I have no fear of being discredited by my claim that many Freepers here supported those trade deals, because everyone who was lurking or posting here at the time remembers those debates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.