Posted on 04/17/2024 5:51:21 PM PDT by NetAddicted
Harvard has been in existence for 387 years. It has taken then that long to determine that they are “not sure” if the presence of genetic makes in female sports is harmful to females. In another 387 years they may decide it probably “is”/”is not” harmful to females - given lots of research, government funding, and a little luck.
The absolute best is when these soy boys and morbidly obese feminists say that female swimmers need to just “work harder.”
It’s not hard work. It’s also not just present testosterone level. It’s also not just testosterone levels throughout development. It’s also not just neuromuscular efficiency.
It’s a combination of physical factors that exist from conception. Hard work is a given at high levels competition. I’m sure that resisting reality all of the time is probably also difficult.
Exactly. There are studies that demonstrate the field tilts toward males who have transitioned. In terms of cardiac output low normal levels in women are pathological in men.
Fight Fiercely Harvard!
Dogma over facts.
Do you have links to these studies?
Harvard study?
They produce a lot of lawyers don’t they?
And judges and justices to the so-called “supreme” court?
Guess I’m prejudiced but I don’t trust anyone who aspires to hold a position where they sit in an elevated position and wear black robes.
Nearly every judge and justice appointed to the federal judiciary is nothing more than a cheap political hack who scored a lifetime appointment.
The fact that they sit on high and surround themselves in somber ceremonial trappings does not change that fact.
The fact that Trump sits on trial today and Hunter Biden has yet to face a jury on any charge is an INDICTMENT of the judicial system.
This is a TRAVESTY.
Our judicial system is the weakest link of our Republic’s three branches.
George Soros recognized this, exploited the weakness, and we are now living in a mere shell of what was a Free Republic.
Not primarily meant to deceive, but rather to test your willingness to pretend to be deceived.
No, I will look
This is great on cardiac differences. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980481/#:~:text=Our%20study%20finds%20that%2C%20compared,generates%20a%20smaller%20cardiac%20output. Smaller Heart lower cardiac out put.
This should cover Resp anatomy and physiology. https://err.ersjournals.com/content/31/163/210074
Unclear as in whether Bolt’s 9.58 sec.is faster than Griffith-Joyner’s 10.49 sec. (both current world records) for the 100m? Wait a sec., . . . Advantage Bolt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.