Posted on 04/23/2024 9:36:42 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
There is Zero salvation for New York City and its inhabitants...best they just disappeared in a puff of smoke.
Considering that it’s NYC we’re talking about, those numbers don’t look so bad.
One of the things I find curious about polls is that even if I’m sent a questionnaire for anything, I almost never answer it. Rarely do I participate. I don’t want to be bothered, for the first thing. The second thing is that I don’t want to be misunderstood. They often ask a question in such a way that the answer can be interpreted however they see fit, and not how I intended. So who are the people who answer these polls?
Isn’t Merchan being paid money to “hush” Trump up?
I wonder if he reports his salary as a campaign expense.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
iirc, they’re running that money through his daughter + giving his wife a cushie job
New yerkers......meh!
-PJ
Here’s the statute: https://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article175.php#p175.15
It is only a felony if it is intended to hide the commission of another crime.
What is that other crime that Trump was intending to hide?
Bragg won’t say. Without saying, his charges are misdemeanors at worst, and too late to prosecute at that.
ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK is more useful everyday.
AGREED
Thanks. I just looked it up myself and posted about it before I saw your response.
Even if Trump falsified business records (and I doubt that he did), it is a misdemeanor and beyond the statute of limitations.
To bring these charges the falsification had to be to cover up a different crime. Bragg won’t say what crime that is. It is the whole justification for thim bringing the case, and he won’t say what it is.
Before this case could even be brought, Trump should have been required to be convicted of whatever crime it is that he supposedly hid through the “fraud”.
But Bragg not only won’t cite the crime Trump was found guilty of, he won’t charge Trump with the crime, and he won’t even say what crime it supposedly IS.
This is WAY beyond banana republic territory.
The only thing that matters with this sham trial is the day the hack “judge” pronounces “judgement” on Trump’s bogus felonies.
Then I wonder if his wife and daughter are reporting their income as campaign expenses.
NYC wanted to secede during the Civil War; we should take them up on it and build a wall around the city. Hillary Clinton could be the first NYC “president”, having failed the DC Bar exam.
For some reason a FReeper singled me out for being against the Leftist New Yorkers a few weeks ago.
I was conciliatory and gracious.
Reconsidering.
Cooked poll.
Again.
GOOD POINT
Democrats are using the law as a sledgehammer to take down their political opponents - and most likely with the ‘help’ of ‘intelligence’. <P?This is lowlife totalitarian crap at a third world level.
Illegal campaign contributions.
Did Bragg say that anywhere? If so, what law does he cite, and when was Trump charged and convicted of that crime?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.