Skip to comments.
NASA Solves Moon Mystery (+Geology Picture of the Week,
February 16-22, 2003)
February 20, 2003
| Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Posted on 02/21/2003 1:47:27 PM PST by cogitator
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Geology doesn't HAVE to be on the Earth.
1
posted on
02/21/2003 1:47:27 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: cogitator
Geology doesn't HAVE to be on the Earth.Actually, from the root of the word, Geo, it does - this is lunology :^)
2
posted on
02/21/2003 1:50:55 PM PST
by
dirtboy
To: cogitator
Actually, I thought Geo means Earth, and Selene means Moon, so isn't the scientific term officially selenology? I thought I had heard this as fact somewhere...
To: cogitator
Great report.
BTW, anyone have Stuart's original impact picture?
4
posted on
02/21/2003 1:54:01 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
To: dirtboy
I was going to suggest "lunacy."
5
posted on
02/21/2003 1:54:34 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
To: 2Trievers; headsonpikes; Pokey78; Lil'freeper; epsjr; sauropod; kayak; Miss Marple; CPT Clay; ...
*ping*
6
posted on
02/21/2003 1:54:36 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: My2Cents
BTW, anyone have Stuart's original impact picture? Click the link (the title of the article); it's there. The impact is a white dot on the terminator. (Good word to use!)
7
posted on
02/21/2003 1:55:46 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: My2Cents
I was being lazy. The picture is below.
8
posted on
02/21/2003 1:56:58 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: Frank_Discussion
Actually, I thought Geo means Earth, and Selene means Moon, so isn't the scientific term officially selenology? I thought I had heard this as fact somewhere... You're probably right, but if you look it up in Websters, the second meaning applies:
"b: a study of the solid matter of a celestial body (as the moon)"
You'll see a lot of references to "lunar geology" abounding.
9
posted on
02/21/2003 2:00:13 PM PST
by
cogitator
To: cogitator
That crater at the top looks like the man-in-the-moon's anus.
To: cogitator
Cool. Thanks.
11
posted on
02/21/2003 2:01:21 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("...The bombing begins in 5 minutes.")
To: cogitator
OK, now they can explain
this:
12
posted on
02/21/2003 2:08:00 PM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Freeps Ahoy! Caribbean cruise May 31... from $610 http://www.freeper.org)
To: Nick Danger
OK, now they can explain this:Trick of the eyes. It's not really there; we just think it means something.
To: cogitator
There's no "there" there.
To: cogitator
What causes the bright flash of light?
Hint: Never misunderestimate the effect of kinetic energy.
To: Nick Danger
I think that that moon was taken through Monica's thong undies!
16
posted on
02/21/2003 2:14:55 PM PST
by
aShepard
To: cogitator
Buratti and Johnson calculated the energy released at impact was about .5 megatons (35 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb). They estimate such events occur on the lunar surface once every half-century.Really? That would be a quite noticeable impact. If this is thought to occur once every 50 years on the moon, how often ought it to happen on earth? Even given that most asteroids would land in the ocean, I would think we'd have more of a record of observed collisions in historical times if something of this size is coming in every 50 years or so.
17
posted on
02/21/2003 2:27:56 PM PST
by
sphinx
To: sphinx
Really? That would be a quite noticeable impact.IF it made it to the surface. I'm not completely up on the details, but according to the story...
"Using Stuart's photograph of the lunar flash, we estimated the object that hit the Moon was approximately 20 meters (65.6 feet) across, and the resulting crater would be in the range of one to two kilometers (.62 to 1.24 miles) across. We were looking for fresh craters with a non-eroded appearance," Buratti said.
I'm fairly sure a 20 m diameter object would be burned to a cinder long before it hit Earth's surface. Having an atmosphere is a nice thing.
18
posted on
02/21/2003 2:41:29 PM PST
by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: Nick Danger
"OK, now they can explain this. Now you've done it - you just created a weeks worth of "Coast to Coast" (formerly Art Bell) programming material!
To: sphinx
> If this is thought to occur once every 50 years on
> the moon, how often ought it to happen on earth?
Five per year in the 1 KT range.
One per century in the 1 MT range.
See:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-02/danl-lar021203.php
> Even given that most asteroids would land in the ocean
Or explode in the upper atmosphere.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson