Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'First Americans Were Australian'
BBC ^ | 6-15-2003

Posted on 06/15/2003 9:18:19 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: blam
It looks like Jean-Luc Picard.
21 posted on 06/15/2003 10:02:13 PM PDT by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam
"9,400 years ago in Nevada."

There are petroglyphs not far from here that have never been dated or translated. Yet, there are Indians all around here.

yitbos, BBM, Boulder City, Nevada

22 posted on 06/15/2003 10:02:52 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Veritas Vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Perhaps and Australian Abo should take a look at them.
23 posted on 06/15/2003 10:04:29 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Veritas Vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

9,300 year old Kennewick Man, He die in his mid-40's too. (In Washington State)

24 posted on 06/15/2003 10:05:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
Jean-Luc must have gotten his orbit co-ord's backwards....
25 posted on 06/15/2003 10:07:48 PM PDT by TLI (...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam
The identity of the first Americans is an emotive and controversial question.

Which is why, without the Internet and the BBC, this news would
never make the popular press in the US of A.
26 posted on 06/15/2003 10:08:46 PM PDT by gcruse (Support home churching.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Here is the picture of the Australian Aborigine that didn't post (second picture) in the original article.

27 posted on 06/15/2003 10:08:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Maybe but have patience.

Consider the change in land mass. Consider the genetic studies. Time will hopefully tell.

What bothers me much more than possible slanted findings is stopping research dead in it's tracts for political gain (a.k.a. Kennewick man fiasco)
28 posted on 06/15/2003 10:11:30 PM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
YEC SPOTREP
29 posted on 06/15/2003 10:11:38 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Comps on your evidently wonderful sense of irony! :^)
30 posted on 06/15/2003 10:15:02 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
No mention of what's his name, up in Washington, or wherever. The one that the Native American's laid claim to...

(I'm trying to think of a clever Creationist/Darwinist jibe, but I can't)

31 posted on 06/15/2003 10:16:15 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const KayEyeDoubleDee& otherKIDD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizma
The First Americans

(long but good read)

32 posted on 06/15/2003 10:17:29 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
Kennewick man!!!
33 posted on 06/15/2003 10:18:01 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const KayEyeDoubleDee& otherKIDD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam
Re: Kennewick Man

As I recall, the Washington Indians want nothing to do with this dude. If his ancestry is verified it would ruin about 90% of, ahem, "native American" claims concerning ancestral rights, many of which have been written into law.

yitbos

34 posted on 06/15/2003 10:20:13 PM PDT by bruinbirdman (Veritas Vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
"No mention of what's his name, up in Washington, or wherever. The one that the Native American's laid claim to... "

Kennewick Man, the Indians have lost a couple times on this but, I think it is in court again on appeal.

35 posted on 06/15/2003 10:21:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
David Chatters, the archaeologist who did the major work on Kennewick Man, in his book, Ancient Encounters, said that the Indians spit on him, physically assaulted and threatened to kill him. (...and a lot of other shenigans)

The Clintons ordered the Corps Of Engineers to destroy the discovery site by hauling in dirt, rocks and etc. and covered the site and would not allow further evacuation. It got pretty hot and heavy for a while.

36 posted on 06/15/2003 10:29:30 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam
One little problem with the "drifted and washed ashore" theory: Note that the modern occurrence was fisherMEN. There's no reason to assume that women were out on fishing expeditions which were blown off-course.

On the other hand, if like the Polynesians the purported Aborigines were trying to retreat from enemies they might have loaded whole families into boats and tried to find new uninhabited lands.

Did you know that the Lombok Straits between Bali and Lombok (both in the country of Indonesia) separate the Indo-Malayan realm from the Austro-Malayan realm? Bali and west: elephants, orangs, tigers (once), cattle, rhinos. Lombok and east: kangaroos, birds-of-paradise, parrots, eucalyptus trees, platypus.

The animals, birds, and trees did not or could not cross the deep, treacherous Lombok Straits. But humans did, maybe as long ago as 50 or 60,000 years. The date is definitely subject to speculation; that humans DID cross the Straits long ago is not. Maybe they made the 40-mile crossing on rafts or in dugout canoes (outriggers?). Who knows? The thing to remember is, "Primitive doesn't mean stupid".

People got around in prehistoric times; we're interrelated to a greater degree than almost any other species.
37 posted on 06/15/2003 10:29:33 PM PDT by petuniasevan (I'm hitting the control key but it's not giving me any!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
...hopefully this will mean everyone will be able to open a tax free casino.

LOL! And tax free cigarettes, don't forget that!

38 posted on 06/15/2003 10:31:04 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
"The animals, birds, and trees did not or could not cross the deep, treacherous Lombok Straits. But humans did, maybe as long ago as 50 or 60,000 years."

Yes, I did know that.

You must be talking about Mungo Man and his gang (68,000 years ago), huh.

BTW, recent DNA analysis indicates that he has a modern human body but is not related to any human alive today. (A dead end human line?)

39 posted on 06/15/2003 10:39:39 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan

Statue unearthed by archaeologists at an Olmec(1200BC) site in Mexico.

(Just needs a skull-cap, huh?)

40 posted on 06/15/2003 10:48:43 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson