Prophetic shocker: Romans didn't destroy Temple

WorldNetDaily ^ | August 21, 2009

[jimtorr]

How did you come up with the head of the Catholic church as a possible candidate?

I didn't say that the Pope would become the Antichrist, I said Anticrist would become the Pope. I think in prophecy it is clear that after the Antichrist manifests, he/it will be made the leader of all the worlds religious organizations. Believers will reject him, and be persecuted.

[topcat54]

 I think the prophecies yet to be fulfilled . . . indicate that the ‘revived’ Roman empire will be a key player in the satanic END TIMES tyrannical glob 

   The "revived Roman empire" is another 

  

[Quix]

Always the joker.

[Mogollon]

The prediction is that the AC will rule over what was the Roman Empire but he is not necessarily a Roman or even a European.

[Iscool]

One of the central tenets of the Christian belief in a coming Roman Antichrist

I believe it would be more accurate to say the False Prophet is thought to be a Roman Catholic pope who will lead his religion into a world, ecumenical religion which includes Izlam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc...

This one world religion will usher in the anti-Christ who will bring temporary peace to the world, and who will be accepted and revered by all religions of the world...

He will not necessarily be a Catholic, or a muzlim but they will look to him as their leader...

After three and a half years, he will be struck down and killed...This anti-Christ will come back to life and claim to be God...People will witness the miracle on CNN, Fox, CBS, etc. and all fall in line to worship the 'Christ'...

It is said by many who have researched the scriptures that this anti-Christ will be an Israeli of Arabic descent

[thatjoeguy]

WorldNetDaily called, they want to know if you want to write for them...

Lol, no thanks.

Of course Judaism would record that, what would you expect? The historical accounts (from a Jewish eye witness no less) speaks for itself.

[Lee N. Field]

One of the central tenets of the Christian belief in a coming Roman Antichrist

Huh? Since when is a minor feature of modern dispensational eschatology a "central tenet of Christian belief", on the level of any assertion in the Apostle's Creed?

That does it. I'm starting a "WND Heresy" file.

[safisoft]

Sorry. You are swimming upstream. The historical record shows quite clearly that Titus’ men destroyed the Temple.

[topcat54]

The prediction is that the AC will rule over what was the Roman Empire but he is not necessarily a Roman or even a European.

Since this is all being invented by dispensational futurists, that can say anything is possible. He could be Colombian or Korean or and Eskimo. It doesn't matter when you are inventing theology on the fly. Folks will still buy the books no matter how nutty the ideas. Richardson is another one who has figured out how to capitalize on the ignornace of the Christian reading public.

[Quix]

I think our REPLACEMENTARIANS et al heresy file would be a LOT longer.

[headsonpikes]

“Prophetic shocker: Romans didn’t destroy Temple”

Yet.

[Lee N. Field]

Was it Prisca or Maximilla who spoke at service today?

[Quix]

I see some REPLACEMENTARIANS et al have taken out a license on the

ABSURD BLATHER

communications module! LOL.

[Lee N. Field]

Reference went over you head, didn't it.

Look it up.

[Quix]

Flattering the bloke in your mirror again?

Oh, that’s right, the mirrors were shattered long ago!

[Quix]

My memory of such things is faint, indeed.

It may be that a refresher would be worth it when I have the time.

However, it is striking that some seem to construe themselves as the only readers of such histories . . . somewhat akin to construing their tidy little boxed personal theologies as the only comprehensive REALLY TRUESTLY REAL AND TRUESTLY TRUE “theology.”

And here I thought they kept helium mostly in pressure cylinders and balloons.

LOL.

[Marysecretary]

The revived Roman empire doesn’t necessarily mean Rome itself but all the other countries involved in that. None of us really knows, but it’s fun to speculate.

[Quix]

INDEED.

[Uri’el-2012]

Somehow the Arch of Titus in Rome documents the sack of Jerusalem.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

[Quix]

YUP.

Had forgotten that.

Thx.