Free Republic

Atheist physicists often refer to a "primordial soup" as a basis for the development of life on earth. However, they cannot precisely map from that soup, in a mathematical way, into an actual life form. Sure, there are plenty of theories about atmospheric conditions that are "ripe for creating life", but it remains conjecture, although the die-hard atheist physicist presents it as factual. They use the "authority" associated with their title, or their position within a university or other research organization, providing false fodder for young minds full of mush, who could not think critically of their lives depended on it

What is "primordial soup"? Well, ask 10 different physicists or cosmologists or astronomers and you will get (10 choose 2)*100 different answers. You might as well ask an astrologist or a card reader, or a good witch for that matter.

You see, as hard as they have tried, experiments to create spontaneous life have NEVER EVER NEVER created a single life form. Sure, they claim that the "life precursors" are created in the form of proteins and amino acids, but we have yet to see even the simplest single-celled life form spontaneous appear from these experiments, where presumably they have created plenty of "primordial soup".

Now, given their miserable failures to spontaneously generate life forms, even a single one, how on earth will they demonstrate the creation of an irreducibly complex organism? How will they demonstrate the "evolution" of abstract thinking in humans? How will they explain the coordinated, parallel bio-systems development in a human fetus, or any fetus of any species for that matter?

Well, they cannot.

One has to wonder: Why do atheists who are scientists cling so tightly to ideas that have no foundations in actual fact, no foundations in solid theorems backed up with data acquired through lab experiments? After all, aren't these same atheists scientists always challenging proponents of Intelligent Design to backup their assertions with actual data derived from lab work?

Let me put it this way: anyone of you atheists physicists out there who can present a case for evolution from the simplest of life forms to abstract thinking in humans will win an all expense paid trip to the Galapagos Islands. Better yet, I will not only pay for your trip to the island, I will also give you $1000 in spending money.

Remember to present your case using the scientific method: (1) Propose a theorem for evolution from the simplest life forms to a human being with the abstract thinking function (2) Design lab experiments to validate your theorem (3) Describe your test cases in detail (4) Record the results of each test case in detail (5) Map the data to the original thesis (6) demonstrate via data that you have proven the validity of your thesis.

In fact, you will fail. There is no way to evolve a simple life form to abstract thinking. You are doomed.

When you are done with this use case, then let's try this one: how did the first life form come to be?

GOOD LUCK but there is no hope to solve these problems!

One thing we do know is that each cell membrane contains epi-genetic encodings. This means that somehow, in some way, an "intelligence" was able to generate a "programming sequence", or set of parallel programmed sequences, which contained the instruction sets necessary to build a more complex life form. But the problem for the atheist physicist is that unless the "primordial soup" contained actual life forms, there would be no way for epi-genetic programming sequences to actually be executed. But we already have admissions from each and every atheist physicist that the primordial soup was full of "pre-life" conditions, not life itself.

So the impossibility of answering this challenge actually starts and ends at the primordial soup.

But I will give all of you a break. Let's assume that the primordial soup has already successfully done its job and created a single-celled life form. I will let you start from there to show the evolution to abstract thinking.

Read?.....Go!

It is only becoming the “law of the land” because the judiciary, the increasingly liberal judiciary, is squashing the will of the states, where with minor exception, there is overwhelming support to define marriage as between a man and a woman. Ballots in states defining marriage in this way WIN, but the “men in back” feel that they must correct the wrongs of “the ignorant masses”.

So this argument that it is “increasingly the law of the land” simply breaks down because the law came about from an intrusive judiciary.

It is amazing that those who proclaim “the will of the people to paramount” do everything in their power to make sure thee opposite is true.

Look, homosexuality is obviously abnormal (I did not say “wrong”, I said “abnormal”). This is simply true by matter of logic. There is no reproductive purpose to it. Darwinism would have you believe that eventually the homosexual population would decline because of this. But we know that this does not happen and that plus or minus, the percentage of those who are homosexual remains relatively constant over time. Given the absence of a definitive “gay gene” plus this constancy, the most logical conclusion is that some environmental and/or societal conditions result in homosexual adults.

Get used to it, people of faith and many others just do not agree with the gay lifestyle, do not believe in gay marriage, and DO see homosexuality as abnormal. No amount of hand ringing and forcible “re-education” will change this.

I have no doubt that he was beaten up. Exercise machines are not known for delivering this type of beating as usually they are passive machines. The only other explanation for these horrendous injuries is he was hitting the vodka too hard.

Exactly. I recently saw an episode where they showed a bloody deck on the Japanese vessel with three whales getting prepped for slaughter, and the blood of a previously butchered whale was on the deck. Yet, when we show real butchery, then we become the “bad guys”: http://www.google.it/search?q=aborted+full+term+babies&client=safari&hl=it&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=xnCnVMWEIoylgwTzvoCIBQ&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1024&bih=622#facrc=_&imgrc=8NYUZS_7x1QNHM%253A%3B2OQGcPAJf8tQVM%3Bhttps%253A%252F%252Ftrfdrl.files.wordpress.com%252F2014%252F07%252Fbabies.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fpowderedwigsociety.com%252Fabortion-terrorists-isis%252F%3B640%3B402

I’m all for saving whales, but folks, 50million babies have been butchered since Roe v. Wade. Let’s have a show called “Baby Wars” or “Human Child Wars” or “Made in God’s Image Wars”.

RIORITIES!

Beck IS insane. I noticed his left-wing tendencies a year ago, and his latest bizarre act, providing soccer balls to illegal alien children, is off the charts. Not only is he encouraging more “muling” of children by criminals, who sexually abuse the kids, but his charity is mis-placed because the US-children of the 92.5million displaced workers would most certainly enjoy an American football, or a baseball bat and glove, or just something to eat. Beck needs to stop being a pretender, and folks need to start ignring him, dropping his programs, dropping The Blaze, drop his sponsers, and let him retire with the wealth he bamboozled fom us with his Bill O’Reilly-style act to sway conservatives, then mock them once wealthy. Good riddens Beck.

I am glad you shifted. My background is Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. My highest degree is MS. Obviously I have taken lots of math, chemistry, and physics and some biology, plus computer science, hardware design, electronics, etc.

I don’t see the difference between what theoretical physicists claim, such as that life originated from stars, with absolutely NO PROOF, and the claims of Intelligent Design practitioners. In fact, Intelligent Design has a stronger claim, in my opinion, since they have already identified information coding in DNA and complex structures in cells, which Darwin had previously assumed to be primitive.

In fact, when theoretical physicists claim they have proven the existence of black holes, they really mean that they have indirectly observed the effects of intense gravitational forces on stars and other objects, and by inference, have “positively concluded” that black holes were the source of such forces. This is no different than the claims of Intelligent Design theoreticians, who infer intelligence from signal encoding in DNA and from irreducibly complex organisms and biological structures.

As a lay person with a significant interest in physics and science in general, and as an engineer and computer scientist, it is wrong to dismiss any inquiry as long as scientific methods are used as the basis for the development of theorems. Those who oppose this are just as “religious” as any believer in God, as I am, but their religion becomes simply an anti-deist one.

My advice to all universities, labs, and think tanks: stop being as closed minded about Intelligent Design as you claim those with a belief in God to be. Offer courses in Intelligent Design both at the philosophical level as well as the scientific level. Be open to ALL INQUIRY.

Exactly. This guy Jeb Bush is supposedly one of the “smartest” the RINO have to offer, yet he comes out and disparages Americans, saying we are not as fertile, not as productive, as our illegal immigrants? Who in their right mind would vote for somebody that openly and freely mocks them? It is extremely difficult to understand why anybody would see this Jeb Bush as a bright bulb given these comments. He has not offered a “sincere” apology for making these comments,,so look, he believes what he said. RINO, you need to do better than this.

“Immigrants are more fertile and they love families and they have more intact families and they bring a younger population,” he continued, calling for a more economically focused immigration policy and saying immigrants create an “engine of economic prosperity.”

Jeb, tell that to my triplets, who graduated with HONORS in May, 2012, from their respective universities, in very marketable majors. You see, our “very fertile” family can’t find full-time work, with benefits, but wake up every day at 4am to wait at the pick-up spots where contractors will gab some cheap labor. But my kids never get picked up. In fact, the illegals there openly mock my kids, calling them names like “Gringo”, then laughing and saying things like, “Whats matter, Gringo can no find job?” It’s pathetic.

And what “Skin in the game” has this “President” ever had? Did he serve in the military? Did anyone in his family ever serve? Did anyone in his family ever serve and take a bullet for the USA? The answer is a long and emphatic NO NO AND NO.......

So you are correct, this President has not had any skin in the game that is the US of A, and he does not know or appreciate OUR culture and OUR heritage.