“Siphoned”? I think you mean “subpoenaed”. And yes, she can be compelled to testify, but the court has no authority over what she says other than to compel her to tell the truth.
She’s going to be harder to discredit than Cohen or Pecker. She hasn’t been charged with anything, been offered no deals for her testimony and has no known ax to grind.
05/03/2024 8:50:06 AM PDT
· 26 of 62 Coronal
to Sidebar Moderator
The SCOTUS review has no bearing on the NY case. This isn’t about whatever acts may be covered by Presidential immunity as it all happened before he became President.
04/25/2024 3:22:42 PM PDT
· 13 of 31 Coronal
to who_would_fardels_bear
That was already done when Congress passed the Respect for Marriage Act. Should Obergefell be reversed, any couple legally married in the state or country in which it was done will be legally married in their home state, regardless of whether or not that state has such a law on their books.
He doesn’t need to be at the SCOTUS. That’s what his attorneys are for. SCOTUS generally doesn’t deal directly with plaintiffs and defendants. His presence there would accomplish little if indeed anything at all.