05/21/2024 6:51:12 PM PDT
· 67 of 68 cport
to KenW255
Exactly. They should be kissing her white butt because nobody watches the WNBA. Until now. This is the thanks she gets for possibly increasing revenue so they can have higher salaries. Bell curve at work.
Only got Seven out of Ten. Didn’t watch MTM, nor lost in space. and there was one I missed that I should have known. Oh well, like I tell Mrs. Cport, I can’t be great at everything, just most things...
05/09/2024 7:10:12 AM PDT
· 13 of 15 cport
to Red Badger
“Women in one field office recounted how, to their dismay, it became routine to hear their supervisor talk about their breasts and legs and his sex life,” the report stated
But, educators get to talk about their sex life to students, so what's the issue?
05/08/2024 9:31:14 AM PDT
· 16 of 19 cport
to RandFan
From the article:
Thus, to summarize: Per §3322, servicemembers who are eligible for educational benefits under either the Montgomery GI Bill or the Post-9/11 GI Bill—from a period of service that could qualify for either program—can opt to credit that service toward one educational benefits program or the other," Jackson wrote in her opinion.
However, in his dissenting opinion, Thomas wrote, "The Court holds that, although Rudisill must make some election to switch from his Montgomery to Post-9/11 benefits, the statute's corresponding limits do not apply because it would reduce the amount of available benefits. In my view, the Court ignores the statutory mechanism that Congress created in favor of an interpretation that reaches a desired outcome. I respectfully dissent."
05/07/2024 4:37:57 AM PDT
· 16 of 27 cport
to HIDEK6; Bigg Red
Actually, the genderless pronoun is used properly in this instance. If the subject of the sentence hasn’t been identified as male or female, using “they” is grammatically correct. I found this out while having to use writing standards for term papers in college, way before wokism. Using they to identify oneself is the ridiculous usage.
04/14/2024 5:30:23 PM PDT
· 30 of 39 cport
to grundle
Someone that can punch a 50 something woman in the face, then casually punch a 9 year old, and then have the tacit approval of these so called jurists,is devoid of any sense of conscience. We use to call them psychopaths, which indicate is is a mental health condition. Now it they are called sociopaths, which is used to indicate they are a product of their environment. I really tried to mentally go through the mental motions of the perp, but I just can’t fathom how in could do this without any kind of remorse, except they are crazy. I just can’t.
03/31/2024 6:22:24 AM PDT
· 25 of 47 cport
to FreedomForce
Actually, I thought it was a wise choice to not have a specific house band through the whole movie. Someone with brains realized that trying to replicate that for the movie would be a big fail, so they just used an assortment of bands that fit the locale. I also liked how they went over the top with the bad guys. It kept to the camp bad guys in the original. If it would have been too slick with the action, it wouldn’t have any of the flavor of the original. Still not as good, but a worthy effort. At least they didn’t try and make it an insulting remake that pokes fun of the era of the original, like the 21 jump Street reboot or Starsky and Hutch.