Free Republic

Polarik is leaving FR

And then the very next day:

August 10, 2009

Looks like I did not miss much.

I’ve asked Danae to step in and tell MestaMachine to move on. Mesta has no business acting in her stead and restarting up something that Danae and I resolved over a year ago.

We talked about this at length, how some of the FReepers on here had switched sides. Then, there are always the newbies who try to pretend they are conservatives, but wind up outing themselves when they start to attack.

But, as we already know, nothing riles trolls like the Truth.

Is your name Karen Bracken?

I’m no more going to answer your demands than Obama is going to hand me his real birth certificate.

There is no “Birther movement.”

Yo! Any relation to Jamese777, a frequent libtard poster on the libtard forum, ObamaConspiracy?

Who’s “We?”

You still do not get it.

The Certification of Live Birth is a government document that provides access to an SS number, passport, drivers license, law license, and so on.

The Certification of Live Birth that Obama proffered as a true and legal document attesting to his birth in Hawaii and on US soil is a fraudulent counterfeit, government document that contains false information used expressly to commit felonious acts at the State and Federal levels.

This act cannot be undone by any subsequent action.

And that is why I don’t need to see any more birth certificates.

Releasing an actual original birth certificate will not reverse the criminal acts intentionally and willfully committed through the use of this fraudulent, counterfeit, government document.

There is more than enough evidence to prove that a fraudulent, counterfeit, government document was intentionally created for use in the commission of a crime.

In other words, it is NOT about eligibility - but criminal fraud and acts of subversion and treason against the United States.

Obama ran a fraudulent campaign for President. Obama could not legally claim to be a Presidential candidate by virtue of illegal actions, could not legally obtain the Office of POTUS by virtue of illegal actions, and cannot be POTUS.

Obama will be taken into custody by law enforcement and charged with the crimes so noted. Congress has no say in this matter because Obama is not POTUS.

Obama is a common person with no special powers or authorities. Likewise, Obama is a common crook.

It is no longer an issue of eligibility.

He will be removed by law enforcement, charged with felony fraud, and placed into custody.

Lastly, you must have me confused with someone who actually gives a rodent’s posterior about what you say.

YOU have successfully proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that YOU are a low-life libtard TROLL, that YOU are mind-numbingly stupid, that YOU insist on incessantly babbling total nonsense, and finally, that YOU need to see a neurosurgeon, as soon as possible, because your apparent dysphasia and echolalia are classic signs of undiagnosed brain injuries, and possibly are the only explanations of why you insist on saying that this fraudulent, counterfeit, government document was not forged.

The opposite of "Yes," is not simply saying, "No." Whereas, the opposite of "No," can only be "Yes" to varying degrees.

Obama's COLB is a central part of his birth narrative. Obama's birth narrative is a central part of his deception. Obama's deception is what got liberals to vote for him and support him.

When you have the Obama Administration, via Robert Gibbs, repeatedly telling WND Les Kinsolving that he, Gibbs, posted a "certified copy of Obama's actual birth certificate" on the Internet and that it proves Obama was born in Hawaii and is a US citizen...

When you have Members of Congress also claiming that they have seen a "state certified copy of Obama's birth certificate" on the Internet and believe it proves he was born in Hawaii and is a US citizen...

When you have federal judges saying that they seen have a valid "Obama's birth certificate" on the Internet, and that the issue has been resolved, with one judge in particular snidely remarking that "the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and was otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry"...

When all of the media, both old and new, along with all on the liberal Left, use "Birthers" as a pejorative to attack conservatives as "wingnuts," "kooks," "racists," and other words that would violate FR's TOS, because they know, for a fact, that Obama has not posted a "valid copy of a state-certified original birth certificate," but a totally fraudulent government document, and has spent over $1 million to keep the real thing locked away....

Then, the only answer possible is a big, resounding "Yes."

Destroying Obama's birth narrative will destroy Obama.

If you've ever seen how one domino knocks over thousands of other dominoes, then you will understand how important it is to keep his true birth narrative from ever seeing the light of day.

Only liberals and RINO's want us to stop demanding the release of Obama's actual, original birth certificate.

Those who protect a traitor, in the face of overwhelming evidence of treason, risk becoming traitors themselves.

Who is M. L. Mix? Any relation to Tom Mix. Or Mix 96.1?

I have not been with Berg since Dec. 2008.

FReepers know that. Stupid new trolls do not.

Large Internet footprint?

It’s no bigger than the one you’ve got in your mouth.

What are you going to show, Ms. Dingbat Lady? All of Dianna’s personal information that she asked me not to show?

Are you going to make me go back on my promise to Dianna?

Are you going to make me post all of the emails she sent?

IMHO, I think that she would very much like you to shut the heck up.

I can already tell what are your needs. Puberty, for starters.

Basically, the message that these two idiots need to hear is to take their sh** over to MediaMatters.org. They’d be glad to have them.

Please explain why I should respond to your illiberate crap?

Illiberate. n. An illiterate liberal.

Why was this forgery made? Did you just crawl out from under a rock?

Because it fooled 50 million people into believing it was conclusive proof that he was born in Hawaii.

Because Hawaii already has a birth record for Obama along with amendments that mustbe included on the COLB.

Because they can do, pretty much, whatever they please as long as people like you condone it.

Because you are a troll who is incapable of rational thought or carrying on a civil discussion.

This has absolutely nothing to do with who obama is or why he refuses to produce an actual long form BC.

And what you said has nothing to do with rational thinking.

Furthermore, everyone in the entire state of Hawaii is not corrupt. If there was an actual forgery, someone would be all over it like a fly on sh!t.

Typical liberal illogic and ignorance. This COLB forgery has effectively precluded the release of an actual original birth certificate for the past two years. Who, exactly, is that "someone?" on an island where over 70% of the residents support Obama? This is the same old liberal garbage we've been hearing for over two years. It goes like this:

If this was a forgery, then don't you think ______?

Fill in the blank with the non sequitur of your choice.

If this was a forgery, then don't you think Hillary would have done something?

If this was a forgery, then don't you think McCai9n would have used it?

If this was a forgery, then don't you think I'm an idiot for asking a bogus rhetorical question?

I never said that the "entire State of Hawaii is corrupt." I doubt if anyone said that. I singled out one person who has total control over the the Hawaii Health Department, and whose statements (all two of them) apparently trump the Constitution in the minds of the brain-dead liberals. Because of this one person, we have a fraud in the White House.

Now, don't you think that Fukino would be fish food if she said that Obama was not born in Hawaii? did not dawn on you, did it?

It doesn’t need to be a forgery to be a fraud.

It doesn't need to be edible for someone like you to swallow it. You can call it anything you like - except real.

This is a red herring. You are NOT court vetted, as you claim.

Yes, I am an expert witness.

and I wonder what your personal interest is in promoting this version, different from your old version.

It is called "research," and it evolves over time - quite unlike your species. ...and really, REALLY different...slimed a good freeper ...UNFORGED scan...actual COLB ...on FR... a forgery, a fake, a fraud, when it wasn’t.

Next time, could you please translate that in English? ,p> Did that "Good FReeper," aka Danae, ever post a copy of the COLB she sent me? NO!

Did that "Good FReeper," aka Danae, ever post any copy of her COLB on FR? NO!

Did that "Good FReeper," aka Danae, insist it was a 2000 COLB that was date-stamped March 2007? YES!

Is it possible for a 2007 COLB to look like a 2000 COLB? - only if it was a forgery.

Did that "Good FReeper," aka Danae, believe me when I said it was a 2007 COLB, and not a 2000? NO! In fact, she would have none of it. Did that "Good FReeper," aka Danae, play me and everyone else on FR? You're darn right she did.

Make no mistake - this alleged UNFORGED COLB was nothing of the sort: it was intentionally manipulated to look the way it did. And, since the only way for this 2007 COLB to look like a 2000 COLB is via forgery - especially when the owner of said COLB repeatedly insisted it was a 2000 COLB, and DID NOT COME CLEAN until I brought it to everyone's attention - everyone except the ping list who I predicted would act this way.

Do I appreciate Danae calling me a fraud? No, not when it was her alleged "mistake" that started the deception in the first place.

You can make Einstein sound like an idiot on Relativity by going back far enough before he came up with E=mc2. This is a prime example of liberal dishonesty - going back in time until they find something in the past that they - not us - feel is a counterargument.

Bring up present-day Islamic terrorism, they will bring up the Crusades.

Mention anything about Obama, they will bring up Bush or Reagan.

What is my personal interest in promoting this version? Obama is promoting this version. His Administration is promoting this version. The mainstream media is promoting this version. All of the Obot trolls are promoting this version. I'm merely duplicating it.

Cunningham got hammered for saying HUSSEIN

The Law in no way discriminates against people. Why do these jackasses not recognize that the 40% of Hispanics who came here legally are never going to be bothered by this Law.

It’s the groups like La Raza thaty are racist and discriminatory.

I read that 50% of all illegal Mexican immigrants came into the US via Arizona.

Ten thousand illegals a day is mind-boggling enough.

Obama IS the Dem-a-gogue leading a shirtload of Dem-a-craps.

They get treated almost as well as they treat Jews.

I have had a few FReepers ask me some good questions about the Obama COLB border, vis-a-vis, the one I demonstrate how to make.

I thought that the group should know them, too.

The first thing I said to them was, “If you are looking for logical reasons as to why the forger did what he did, there are none - beyond simply the desire to make a one-off that would surely piss off people like me.

Of all the initially wrong assumptions that I, and other “Sluethers,” made about Obama’s COLB, was to start off with “Ecclesiastes,” as in, “To everything, there is a reason.”

In the case of Obama’s COLB, we thought that every part of it had a reason for being there. Not true.

However, two facts stand out - and I did mention them in the video.

One, that the forger needed to obscure the security paper pattern that could be seen in a real border, and Two, the forger made the border semi-transparent because that is how the security paper pattern is seen below the border.

Back in mid-November 2008, I posted a real 2007 COLB border in which I had found the right mix of coloring, sharpening, and contrast to match that of Obama’s 2007 border.

However, to my chagrin, the alterations I made to the real 2007 border enhanced the security paper pattern that was still visible.

Why was that a problem?

If you enlarge the Obama COLB and look closely at its border, you can see the pattern of the security paper through it. You know that you are looking at security paper because the dark green patterns of the paper are not interrupted by the border.

They patterns run continuously across the face of the COLB, from the left edge of the paper to right edge and from top edge to the bottom edge - but are not perpendicular to the paper! (Chapter One, Part 4).

In other words, the borders on Obama’s COLB are semi-transparent while on the real 2007 COLB, they were close to being opaque.

One of the “security features” of the actual border used in 2007 (as well as in 2006 and 2009) is a very fine mesh through which the security paper can be seen.

It also can be seen on very high resolution scans and photographs - like that 2009 COLB I made - but not perfectly.

Normally, a scan or Xerox copy of a real COLB will cause that mesh to blur and obscure the background pattern of the security paper.

What made the Obama border such a bitch to replicate was the way in which it was repeatedly blurred and sharpened, and then made transparent enough to actually see the “security paper background” through it.

Keep in mind that Obama’s COLB (and my replicate) is a composite of four main layers: the first is an image of security paper; the second is the text layer including the certificate Masthead; the third is the border, and the fourth and last layer contains the “certification stamps” including the Seal, date-stamp, and Registrar’s stamp - which should be as visible as the date stamp, but is not even close (and why I left it off for now. Putting it on, though, is easier than doing the date stamp because the bottom of the border obscures most of it).

The reason for making the date-stamp so visible is to convey a sense of authenticity to the “document.”

Getting back to the problem, I realized that I had to make the border layer semi-transparent, WITHOUT changing the solid black information boxes at the top and bottom. Had they stayed a part of the border, they would have been incorrectly made to be semi-transparent.

Alas, I’m not done yet.

The other kicker about the Obama border is how did the forger keep the lettering in those black boxes sharp and nearly white in appearance.

My first thought was that he typed over an all-black rectangle with a white font. That was not right because in real borders, you can also see the security paper patterns through the text of the boxes like a stencil.

I decided that the text in those boxes were, in fact, transparent , but what initially threw me off the idea was clearing out the existing letters by highlighting them directly.

It made the openings in the letters too wide and too thick.

The solution was to expand the selection by a single pixel after inverting it.

That’s about all I’ll say about the border. I’m concentrating on finishing the book.