Free Republic

Had Powell received one or two injections of the spiked protein generator?

Why would anyone, unless they work for media sources where honesty would cost you your job, trust anything related to pharmaceutical profits from The Lancet, or the New England Journal, or Journal of the American Medical association? Their “peer reviewed” marketing hits on hydroxychloroquine to prepare the market for the experimental gene modifiers should be a shingle on the doors of their offices. At least Lancet and New England have retracted their published papers, in one or both cases (I forget the details since their claimed experimental evidence came from a soft porn fiction writer assisted by a woman who also worked in phone sex. JAMA, which, which unlike Lancet and the New England Journal, has not retracted their paper, published a paper on the lack of positive prophylaxis when the authors of the test tried to cure people already in hospitals with lethal doses of HCQ, one of the safest “drugs” ever approved by the FDS. No physician or scientist will not think about a Lancet or New England, or JAMA paper without remembering the dishonesty of all three famous journals, who get 90% of their funding from big pharma.

Dr. Franklin, happy to see that you have tried to understand what Lindell and Dr. Frank were trying to explain. Please don’t take it as criticism if I try to clarify what they were saying.

Dr. Frank is teaching advanced calculus. Most of calculus, and most applied mathematics is based on applying linear transformations. If you can write a function that describes a particular curve, a linear transformation can be applied to the function to move its graph around a projection of the “page” up, down, rotate it or change the scale without modifying the derivative of the function. Remember, if y=ax + b, and b is a constant, the derivative of b is zero. “b” is the offset because every precinct will have different populations diestributions. The rate of change of a constant is zero. Frank recognized the curve of the population density with respect to age from the 2010 census, and realized that it was VERY close to the population density curve published by the precinct of one of the districts he was asked to evaluate. Bingo! Look at the two lumps in the population curve from the 2010 census. What caused those bumps doesn’t matter. What matters is that the same distribution in every precinct in Ohio showed the same distribution.

It is impossible that every precinct in the nation has the same voter distribution, in particular every precinct has the same two bumps around 50 years of age. The test is what both science and medicine try to impose, and which neither seems interested in applying. Dr. Frank took the 2010 census curve and entered the initial conditions for each precinct into the generating function, which is a 6th degree polynomial. Polynomial functions consist of a sum differentials which, when graphed provide the shape of the curve which is the function. When Frank plotted the 6th degree polynomial, using the real registration numbers for each precinct, his predicted graph exactly matched the reported votes. As mathematicians sometimes say, “QED”. (That is what was to have been demonstrated.) If your proposition produces exactly what appears to have happened in the real world, your proposition is true.

Dr. Frank’s analysis also explains all the phantom votes. Colorado had one precinct with 150% of registered voters, some of whom are the result of no administration of registration records. This allows voter thieves to submit ballots for all those “phantom” voters. Volunteers are now beginning to visit the residences of “Phantom voters”, finding that over 30% don’t exist.

What is being exposed is an enormous effort to steal the election. The ability to apply the linear transform based upon the real population curve drawn from the 2010 census makes it less likely that someone with election experience would see some too obvious manipulation. It also explains why the machines need communication to linear processing machines in real time. The processing center, whether in Frankfurt, or Barcelona, or Canada, or China needed to know, in real time, how much they need to transform the entire curve to keep Biden, or whoever they are supporting, enough, when added to the phantom or printed, or drop box votes with no signatures, or underage, or votes from dead registrations achieve the needed election result. The adjustment needed to made in real time since there are still likely to be some legitimate votes for which there are real citizens and their signatures. Frank assumes that Trump generated more real votes than the left assumed, requiring the large adjustments appearing in the early hours of the mornings after Nov 3 election.

Like Dr. Frank, when the data logs from the Dallas analysis were shown, the same group whose data Lindell used in his first Movie, I recognized that log. I paused the display and recognized the “AWS” (Amazon Web Services) label, noting that the specific connection was to a Frankfurt server farm. I am not connected to those groups, but don’t doubt that they were monitoring network traffic. These are mostly very capable people, on both sides. No one talks because the cost of being discovered can be very high.

I didn’t say I don’t like the way Lindell presents himself. I think he is a hero. His style sounds like a hard sell. His message has more truth than almost any message squeezing through the censorship. (Dr.)Patrick Byrne probably has much of the information that (Dr.) Frank has exposed, though I haven’t heard Byrne (I’m a fan) describe. Byrn has some real experience with “big data”, and, while I haven’t confirmed it. when Byrn did his PhD in philosophy, there a venture into mathematical logic, but Frank’s focus on chemical engineering, and years of teaching the brightest young scientists, makes him uniquely equipped to recognize the hints provided by the data as actually reported. I believe we will eventually learn that this community is sharing data, not competing for clicks.

Thanks for thinking about this. It may take a few listens, but the Frank interview is the path, and will be “absolute” if and when Frank and his team analyze the remaining states. Most people will find “6th degree polynomials” impenetrable. A few people who listen to Frank a few times will grasp most of it. Frank hit most of the key points. Your understanding can help if you will explain it to people you know. I know more people who are more concerned with Trump’s gold plumbing than with why hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent to prevent him from leading us away from globalism.

Not seeing any data or mathematical analysis of Dr. Frank’s theorem, and not intending criticism, because people who haven’t done this sort of analysis may find this explanation a little daunting let me suggest that if you are interested, give it a try. Dr Frank is an excellent teacher who, as he explained, just happened to be teaching data analysis to very bright students using election data to illustrate curve fitting.

Some, as apparently does Steve Bannon, dismiss Lindell because he doesn’t sound like a Harvard grad. Lindell clearly grasped the issues and furthermore is one of very few putting his money out to prove his point. Bannon, I’m guessing, doesn’t know much about mathematics, or data, wants an important position for showing his leadership qualities, and, doesn’t believe he can ride Lindell, who is keeping Bannon’s Warroom program funded, and is not willing to put his reputation on a guy, no matter how well he has done creating a very profitable business, no matter that Lindell was a successful professional gambler and comfortable with big data.

Listen to Frank’s explanations, pausing whenever a graph is hard to read or when you don’t quite grasp the variables, the horizontal and vertical axis. Frank has proved his thesis. Data curves drawn from arbitrarily selected counties will never show exactly the same curve proportions. Frank has sampled all over the U.S. and the implication is that Lindell will support his continuing until all states are examined. There will be retired statisticians who will support, and many hired to try to find fault with Frank’s work. I graduated in mathematics, and even spent some time with polynomial functions. I find Frank’s mathematics very reasonable. The observation that every precinct in Ohio and those examined in Colorado all show the proportionality, including the curious double artifacts, is about as absolute as you get in data analysis. There had to be a reason, and that reason was that all the votes were created by an algorithm based upon the 2010 census. The November election was synthesized. No individual’s vote was decided by other than an algoritm. I bought some pillows, but may need some new slippers!

What are the bets that Lindell’s proposed media hub was named after Dr. Frank? If truth and science mean anything, the problem Lindell, and all of us need to solve is getting a hearing. When Lindell talks about getting this “Absolute Proof” to the supreme court, I cringe a little, because the Supreme Court is not Supreme any more. Navarro’s work is easier to understand, but departments of justice are compromised, both at the federal and state levels. The states have ignored him.

Lindell is certainly not slick; I would prefer that he control his desire to tell it all, forgetting that he is interviewing a scientist who has provided a key to proving his case, including the case with the election equipment crooks. The maligned Sidney Powell has made claims similar to what Frank proved, or will have proved about most the the states having been involved. If 2010 census data was the source of the curve applied in every state, there can be no doubt. Frank’s may have been connected to Powell.

Of course its a lie. My concern, as a kernel and hardware architecture guy, is that I don't know the capabilities of the Allied group. I am not current, but can see many (hundreds) of ways to remove and replace the functionality necessary to control the presumed count. In fact, there has been little need to pretend to count for decades.

There is little need examine the machines given the relatively small amount of code described in the Dominion Users Manual, code which could have been implemented in script languages. Assuming the WiFi connections on tabulation machines, or in the Canon scanners are there; very likely since this is mostly off-the-shelf hardware. The commands to control the reported counts or correct for the addition of hundreds of paper ballots, can be managed remotely. When when the tabulation systems “halted” simultaneously, did they halt? There would have been more than enough time to “correct” the counts, wipe the data and code, and install a clean copy of the OS and any possibly incriminating data. All you need are communications and administrative privileges.

I would look to the boot sequence. Are the machines configured for dual boot? All the software including the OS easily fit on a USB flash drive.

I don't know the team at Allied, but Russ Ramsland seems to have a better grasp of computer systems than most CEOS, but I grimace when I hear Sidney Powell, one of my heroines, trying answer loaded questions about issues she has been told about, but perhaps by people who aren't themselves expert in the technology.

Mark Russinovich of Microsoft who is not only the author of a great series of books on Windows Internals, but has written a series of “fiction” thrillers about international attacks on computer systems is who I would want examining the kludge being called Dominion. Mark's troubleshooting lectures at “WINHEC” are famous, and where, as a DEC engineer, I first learned that WindowsNT is built on VMS. We need the best engineers available or, if we aren't already working for China we will be, because we have no reason to trust elections, which are the foundation of a free republic. Regardless of their feelings about Trump, Mark, and the father of Windows and VMS, Dave Cutler, cannot want their children and grandchildren to have lost the independence they had to guide their own lives.

Possibly a coincidence but probably not, Larry Tribe, on Obama’s Election team, cleverly steered the “woke” media media around the fact that Barak/Barry was not constitutionally eligible to the presidency. Larry graduated from Lincoln High School in 1959. Republicans offered a plank of presidential contenders including John McCain, for whom Larry wrote a lengthy letter of support in Senate Resolution 511, March 2008. SR511, a “resolution” having no legal weight, but made necessary after Barak and McCaskill’s Senate Bill, SB2678, February 2008, to declare children of military parents, but born on foreign soil, to be eligible to the presidency failed to pass. Larry argued that because McCain’s parents were clearly citizens, a bill from the 1st Congress suggests that our Framers would have wanted the definition of natural born citizenship to include children not born on US sovereign territory, but to parents who were citizens.

Larry showed a talent his undergraduate mathematics training would not have countenanced, omitting the fact that Congress completely rescinded that implied amendment to the Constitution shortly thereafter, and the Natural Law definition was never amended. Larry was unhappy with another student, Ted Cruz, when Ted, probably figuring that since Larry and Barak (Barak clearly defined himself as having been born a “native subject of the the British Commonwealth), have decided on a convenient reinterpretation, why shouldn’t he get into the race. Larry excoriated Cruz in Boston newspaper op-ed, for Cruz’ “hypocracy”. But Larry, proud of mostly avoiding the embarassment of being found ot have lied, couldn’t correct Cruz’ explanations of how being born to a Cuban father, Canadian citizenship, and a Canadian birthplace didn’t disqualify hime. So Republican Party officials supported Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and Haley, none of whom were born to “parents who were its citizens”.

Minor v Happersett followed the 14th Amendment because the 14th Amendment provided the definition of naturalized citizens, as compelled by Article 1 Section 8. Wong Kim Ark, Perkins v Elg and several other cases depended upon Minor, making it “positive Law” (Thanks Leo Donofrio and Mario Appuzzo for educating us”. Kamala Harris is the next, born to an Indian and Jamaican. See a pattern? Lets call Lincoln “Tribe Amendment High School”.

Larry was born in Shanghai, to parents who escaped anti-Semitism by moving to China. Too bad an American Assistant Treasury Secretary, and one of many Communist activists, undermined the Chang Kai-shek and the nationalists or China might not have lost 30 or 40 millions to the purge that came with KGB-trained Mao who received the American support transferred by Harry Dexter White from the Nationalist Chiang Kai-Shek to Mao. (White also created the IMF.) Larry probably had no idea that a free America is probably why he and his family survived, but he certainly knows that he is subverting our Constitution.

For those who haven’t read the Congressional Globe (Record) 9 March, 1866, page 1291, Ohio Congressman John Bingham, who was and ardent abolitionist and Military judge for the trial of the Lincoln assassination conspiracy:

I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen….

Virginius, I was rushing when I posted the comment you are responding to. It is not obvious because until Obama there had only been one very likely ineligible president, Chester Arthur, who, like Lois Lerner and Hillary, when he was close to death from some illness, burned all of his personal papers (thank you Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo for teaching us all). The Constitution. ...”Or a citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of the Chis Constitution” was necessary since the first Presidents couldn’t have been born to citizens before the Declaration we were British subjects. Beginning in 1787, subtract 35 from 1787. So the first 35 year old candidate was born on or before 1752. He lived through the revolution and was offered the option to pledge allegiance to the United States or remain British. Since the only citizens were natural born citizens until after 1866 (Article 1 Section 8, The first states each had their own constitutions and had different rules for naturalization (non-uniform), and everyone knew that slaves needed to be included. That is much of why it took so long to pass the 14th Amendment. Virtually any citizen of a state who participated in the revolution was offered citizenship, but no natural born citizenships until that early citizen married a citizen, making their children natural born if born on sovereign soil. None of this applies to Kamala, or Barack, or Cruz, or Haley, or Jindal, or Rubio.

“An Uniform Rule for Naturalization” clarified citizens, so there was a formula to try to fulfil the need for a chief executive whose sole allegiance was to the 1787 Constitution. Other “States”, like France, Spain, Italy, Britain, ...had different rules. The most concise explanations for the differences between Subjects and Citizens is in David Ramsey’s, “Dissertation on ... acquiring the privileges of a Citizen”, and in Thomas Paine’s “Rights of Man”. Pat 2 “Of Constitutions”.

McCain had a different problem. Obama and McKaskill tried to fix this in January 2008 with Senate Bill 2678. It would have amended the Constitution, which is not legal, and didn’t pass. So Larry Trive revived an act passed by the 1st Congress, granting natural born citizenship to the chidden of U.S. officials born “beyond the seas”. Larry cited that as the reason McCain should be “reputed” a natural born citizen. But Larry conveniently omitted the footnote to the Citizenship Act, not mentioning that it had been completely reversed a couple of Congresses later, probably because Congress can’t rewrite the Constitution without an amendment or convention. This omission is found in the letter to the Senate by Tribe and Ted Olson supporting Senate Res 511, which had no force of law anyway. So Larry is just doing what progressive do so well, muddying the waters by authoritatively lying, presuming few people have actually read the Constitution, including few Lawyers, for whom business law is much more rewarding.

There are most likely some well-informed Freepers still paying attention. Just because the media and the two corporations, Democrat and Republican, participated doesn’t mean the law has been changed. It can only be changed by amendment or Article V Convention. It never has been changed, just ignored. None of the presidential aspirants or presumed ascendants, Kamala Harris, Obama, Cruz, Jindal, Rubio, McCain, pr Nikki Halley was Constitutionally eligible.

Before the 14th Amendment defined the who was a citizen by naturalization, only natural born citizens were defined in the Constitution. When Virginia Minor sued for suffrage rights after the passage of the 14th Amendment the Supreme Court only had jurisdiction of Minor was a citizen, which she was because she was a Natural Born Citizen. Thus this 1885 case was the first to require the common law definition of Natural Born Citizen to be clarified, and it was. The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

Larry Tribe, Constitutional Law professor for both Obama dn Cruz admitted as much, but sneakily, in his letter to the Senate Resolution trying to claim what neither the Constituiion nor the Congress said, that were the fonders around before the 2008 election, they would have made McCain a Natural Born Citizen. The real objective to was cover for Obama’s ineligibility (Obama never was and never claimed to a NBC; he said, “I was a nartural born subject of the British Commonwealth because my father was a British Subject”.

There is a presumption that the Vice President must satisfy the Constitution requirements of the President, but this writer could find no such requirement. A guess is that in ineligible VP might take over until the Congress gets around to appointing an eligible person. The Presidency is the only government office requireing both citizen parents and birth on soverign U.S. Sooil. When McCain was born, in 1936, the Canal Zone was not yet declared sovereign soil by Congress. Everyone in Congress in 2008 knew the truth, and Obama even sponsored with Clair McCaskill to make him eligible. It would have been moot, but failed in Congress. Thus a non-binding Resolution was launched in April 2008, Senate Resolution 511.

Just as I don’t expect our DOJ to indict anyone; ineligibility has clearly been tacitly approved by both parties, but it doesn’t hurt to understand the law. Don’t be surprised by the nonsense about the 14th Amendment being confidently preached by supposed Constitutionalists, or by Larry Tribe’s ridiculous citation of the “Grandfather Clause”. (I doubt the Kamala Harris’ parents were born in 1787, but many of their foot solders won’t see the significance of 1787).

With the weakness and dishonesty of the U.S. Legal system the major media will tell everyone what the “truth” is, but the documents will survive, and some historian will write about the demise of The Constitution in some future, tracking the destruction of our foundation and the “Nature Law” upon which it is based. The oligarchs funding our propaganda machines may not like who will likely control their and their family’s futures.

Thanks SeekAndFind. Having followed early reporting on the Ford Foundaton study, my skepticism was aroused when these tests, like so many of the propaganda reports, did not include the treatment protocol element Zinc. Of course all of us have some zinc in our bodies, but more than 10 nations use the HCQ + zinc + azithromycin mixture, based upon the experimental evidence of zinc’s antiviral properties. A bottle of 100 220 mg zinc capsules costs about $10 at Amazon. One wonders if the lurking anti-Semites objected to the Jewish doctor who did his research, followed the research in Germany, India, France, South Korea, China, Brazil, ....and put his community of immunocompromised patients on the combination. Zelenko was interviewed by Rudy Giuliani, probably leading to Trump’s announcement that HCQ was a promising and effective Covid-19 Zelenko, who has cancer and one lung, has many reasons to keep his patients out of the hospital. He stresses who critical early intervention is. Respirators kill most of those who don’t get eearly treatment. Tests can take days or weeks, by which time the damage to lungs has been done.
Zelenko has been contacted by country after county, countries which aren’t fighting over control of the federal piggy bank, for guidance based upon his direct experience. In his community of 36,000 ultraorthodox Jews, with very large families and lots of elderly, 1000 were immune challenged and over 65 yo. 1000 were treated with HCQ, zinc, azithromycin. Two died, one of Leukemia and the other, 85 yo, may have had a stroke - (I don’t recall that detail.) Listen to the last Zelenko interview with Giuliani if you are curious. Kudos to the Yale epidemiologist, but why didn’t he note that the most famous protocol in the Covid -19 reportage, now called “the Zelenko Protocol”, includes zinc. Zinc is the antiviral element. Why is it not included the this Ford Foundation study as it was not included in the Veterans Admin in the New England Journal nor in the Lancet study both of which studies were later retracted for lack of supporing data and ridiculous (lethal) doses of HCQ. Good that HCQ is not being attacked; or is it? If the dozens of vaccines can claim to help half the target patients, the effectiveness of HCQ, Zinc, and Azithromicyn (a pneumonia prophylactic) is relatively comparable. Zelenko’s and Roualt’s numbers, and Singapore’s, and South Korea’s, and India’s etc. are, except for the cost, comparable. We wouldn’t want to deny CDC/NIH/FDA or WHO or Bill and Melinda, the “free” taxpayer funds they are spending to help our major media sources survive, or flourish, or funds to help them protect “The Swamp” which destruction Trump has always declared to be his principal objective.

One of the more typical functions of the CDC is spending monies from Hillary’s State Department, The Agency for International Development (AID), was a large donor to the Clinton Health Action Initiative, one of the dozens of charities derived from the William J. Clinton Presidential Library, which only ever applied for the right to accept donations for a library in Little Rock to house Bill’s presidential papers. Hillary to CDC to Clinton Foundation. Is that a “Quid-pro Quo?” Where it went after that only the FBI might know, and they aren’t talking. But we know that McCabe bought a new Porsche Spyder and a house in Chappaqua. a half mile from Hillary’s server.

If someone asks I’ll look it up, but a typical example was about $20 million donated to the Clinton Health Action Initiative by the CDC, which money came for AID and a Soros NGO. The problem? None of the Clinton non-profits ever legally existed. Bill’s appointment of Lois Lerner to oversee public charities insured that no donor to the Clinton charities would ever be charged with breaking the law, a law which requires large donors to confirm the legitimacy of 501C3s because the donor claims a large tax deduction. The tax deduction is even more useful if the donor is also a beneficiary of the “charity”. Charles Ortel has published the publicly required annual reports of donations to the Clintons, who were illegally the principle officers of their foundation. Family members are not allowed to be principals of public charities.

The Clintons, soliciting donations from over one hundred nations, are racketeers, who were never legally approved for more than a library in Little Rock, but claim to be funding Climate Change, AIDS, etc. etc. And they never completed the application for the Little Rock library. Yearly audits of charities are mandatory, and the only audit for the original foundation was incomplete, and by James Comey’s brother’s firm. The audit was not complete but without a basis, there has never been a legal audit if any of its derivatives.

All over the world. We taxpayers have been funding these patently illegal activities while many donors think they are buying influence Billions of tax dollars disappear into the Clinton Foundations, CHAI, Haiti, Ranbaxi, Ukraine, Sudan, Norway, Australia, etc. Both Political parties and at least two branches of government are implicated. The CDC is a cesspool, closely connected to the WHO. Ask the Haitians how they spent the 12 billion dollars donated through the non-existent Clinton Foundation. Like the dozens of Clinton Foundations, that money never appeared in Haiti. A major donor, Bill Gates, has just resigned from the Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway boards, possibly to protect the boards from complicity in the multibillion dollar fleecing scam which seemed safe because it was run by a former U.S. President, who could run a non-profit as a convicted felon, and his wife who was almost a president.

One might wonder of the donations were to protect from further efforts by Bill’s Department of Justice from breaking up Microsoft?

Wonder why the mainstream media never mention Charles Ortel?
His published analysis obviates the need for cheated individuals, corporations, and nations to do much work in “discovery”, after they get up the courage to bring suit.

After decades of knowing, because data security was part of my job, that U.S. voting security was non-existent, there are signs that a few are beginning to be suspicious. Ask anyone “Who counts the votes in U.S. elections?” Very few know. States each tabulate their own ballots and no U.S. election permits an audit trail. Without paper, and the U.S. is one of few nations who still have not reverted to paper ballots, an audit trail that confirms the voter’s intent is not possible. Printers print what they are sent, but there is no necessary connection to a ballot or touch pad. Beyond the penetrations of the IRS, all the big credit agencies, the FBI and CIA, most banks, we have the votes of millions of dead people and those no longer living in the states where their non-voting records are publicly available to activists of both parties. So ballot “harvesting” is possible, but not necessary when there is no way to validate the voter’s intent - no audit trail.

Modifying records where races are close is trivial given the crude machines presumably storing vote counts. Why bother? there is no audit trail. The SEIU services machines in most if not fall states, and George Soros has funded a “Secretaries of State” project to control those in each state with responsibility for tabulation. As Stalin was reputed to have said “In Democracies only who counts the votes matters”. If and when both parties acknowledge that elections today are mostly a pantomime generating revenue initially for media and eventually for the private or public/private institutions who have learned that controlling the government is the only way to guarantee their revenue, will this change.

Mexico has secure voting requiring biometric identification at the prcint, paper ballots, and no same-day registration. Voting in the U.S. is a smokescreen to conceal how government roles are assigned. It surprises this writer that hundreds of voting districts even bother to report their observation that their submitted counts show 100 to 120 percent of the number of eligible voters voted. No one seems to care. I believe that San Francisco had 30 or more voters older than 120. This is not a recent development, and both parties (remember, parties are private corporations) are complicit.

It’s about time. As a native-born San Franciscan I have often wondered why the Chinese and other Asian residents never seemed interested in exercising their cultural majority. Ellen was recently interviewed by Stefan Molyneux on YouTube. She understands the white collar crime that dominates the San Fran political system.

I should have known about the city’s patronage of mostly white political activists, many attorneys, who become experts in building codes and follow every change. The NGOs are devastating Asian family apartment owners who assumed that property ownership was something they could pass on to their families. The wealth in San Francisco, mostly from the social media industry, government workers and associated lawyers, allows the young Twitter or Facebook or Google employees to pay ridiculous fees after the buildings are foreclosed on by banks because the owners didn’t put in the correct ramps or install new heating or... as required by the latest change in rental regulations. Ellen has addressed the needs of junkies while paying attention to, and abiding by city, state, and federal regulations. I hope she survives the attacks from the entitled class; she wants to clean the SF swamp. I’ll watch with interest and hope, having moved across The Bay some years ago.

I saw, first hand, legal players use the court system to make a good living by gaming the landlords. Lawyers make a living from their piece of the action, which often forces the struggling landlords to sell. Then the banks and real estate agents get their fingers into the carcass. Ellen has been helping that community for years, while working multiple jobs and raising two children. While California may have a long drop in its future, Ellen is all that a Warren or Pelosi isn’t, and could fix lots of things if somehow, her voters are sufficient to overcome the virtually certain voting corruption, probably worse than Orange County’s, in the kingdom of San Francisco.

First, the tabulation should occur in the precincts, which was once the standard, and why precincts were constrained to about a thousand voters. Voting and tabulating was observed and executed by volunteers of all parties present, with tabulations recorded and distributed with encryption and biological signatures to officials of all parties, the State AG, FBI and whomever is deemed necessary. The paper ballots are placed in bonded sealed containers, which;, as the Mexicans do, are transparent and in plane view as they are filled during the voting and sealed with signed identifiers from and resident in each precinct. These counts are the official counts unless there is a legal challenge. A count of all ballot containers from each precinct is stored in state and federal databases and sent to each party, encrypted.

Only France and Belgium among European states do not use paper ballots. Electronic counting invites corruption. Audit trails may be claimed, but hackers are far too sophisticated, with exploits that delete themselves after doing their job of selecting an election winner or eliminating one or several candidates. Government agencies required this writer to develop secure audit trail information for manufactured material before they would approve it trials, let alone for public sale.

Bags of ballots that have not been tabulated in precincts are extremely certainly suspect, given that bonded contains are counted before leaving and upon storage into guarded warehouses. If the container count/precinct does not correlate with the count as reported by the precinct the signators are alerted and the tally from the entire precinct is invalided pending investigation. That is the value of an audit trail. (This writer will not forget the trial of O.J. Simpson where two “criminalists” testified that each had signed about half the physical evidence containers but only evidence from one criminalist was offered as evidence. All physical evidence was invalided, correctly, regardless of how many were certain O.J. was guilty).

Absentee ballots will need special scrutiny. As with recent voting on Brexit and secession of Catalonia from Spain, physical presence of voters on the day of the election should be required. Citizenship checks are an obvious requirement, and absentee voters must have verification such as the new biological ID card now being offered in California.

No audit trail no vote! The U.S. may have the least verifiable voting system in the world, and is among a few that haven’t reverted to paper ballots. Who oversees vote tabulation in virtually every state in the U.S.? The SEIU, reporting to state attorney’s general, who were voted into office with lavish campaign funding from George Soros’ “Attorney General Project”. It is no secret that the AG Project collaborated with Acorn while Obama taught them how to be more effective political activists. SEIU tabulation center workers make it impossible, or difficult for observers to monitor their activities. What good would it do? Without paper there is no baseline. No audit trail.

A “professor of energy.” ...

Sounds like you know John Holdren’s old department. Holdren, Obama’s Science Advisor, whose contribution to energy was to never have done any science, give academic credit for political activism to shut down a brand new nuclear reactor, which produces no CO2, doesn’t kill birds, and reduces energy costs while making lots of EPA lawyers rich. At Berkeley if your goal was to make energy safer and less expensive you studied mechanical engineering. Holdren was laughably wrong, like his mentor Paul Ehrlich and polemicist Amory Lovins, who was brought back from his Aspen sanctuary to be a “University Scientist”, when he was not a scientist, and not the physicist he claimed to be. Too bad for Holdren’s disciples that Soros didn’t come along soon enough to save Ramparts, the leading Marxist journal, based in Berkeley, to which Holdren was a major contributor.

Some will note that Ms. Powell is Coptic Christian; Christians who have been a target of Wahhabi Muslims (like former CIA Director Brennan), for a thousand years or so and whose churches and homes have been targeted by the Muslim Brotherhood even more viciously since Obama broke Morsi out of Jail and ordered Mubarak to put Mhalim Brotherhood Wahhabis in the front row at Al Azhar where Obama delivered his first speech to the World as president. Obama legitimized the hated and previously illegal Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Powell is not likely to condone condemning her relatives to more the sacrilege of church burnings with Coptic Christians locked inside. One can hope that Powell’s first hand knowledge of the culture built upon Jihad, not violent or terrorist or extreme Islam, but, as Erdogan explained, Islam is Islam. It is all in the Quran, its Surah (chapters of the Quran), and Muhammed’s Hadith (or official citations, written by many since Muhammed was illiterate).

Powell, as an Egyptian native, should be a valuable asset since, like a notable number of Arab women, like the Coptic Christian Bridgette Gabriel may feel some sense of community. The Saudis, much as we all abhor most of what is prescribed by Sharia, are our and Israel’s and Ebypt’s allies in the Middle East, remain important to us. Powell is a good fit with the stylish Huma, born to a family of Muslim Brotherhood royalty, and bin-Talal’s Princess Ameera, who could be a movie star had she been born in the West, represent Western ideas. Princess Ameerah doesn’t cover her head and is becoming a crusader for women’s rights in a dying and despotic militaristic cult. Powell could be a brilliant and useful choice because she fits into the Arab culture. This attachment to her culture is, by the way, directly realated to why the framers of our Constitution required that our President be selected from those born on our sovereign territory and to parents who were citizens. Powell’s attachment to Egypt will always be part of her, but her parents, experiencing the evil of Islamic Law, Sharia, became citizens. Powell couldn’t be president, not more so than Cruz, Haley, Jindal, or Rubio, without an amendment or Constitutional violation, which was clearly the case with Obama, but her origins and commensurate understanding of Islam can be a benefit to our security.

A personal example: My children attended a private school whose headmaster was an Algerian Muslim. The headmaster was full of wisdom and always charming. Among our good friend was a family of Arab Christians. Part of that family, much decimated over the decades during several centuries, still lives near Haifa. As Arabs the Christian family’s father shared some events, usually dinners, with the headmaster’s family. The Christian father warned us that the headmaster, assuming familiarity that wasn’t necessarily shared, warned us of the hatred he had for our family and our very successful children, always couched in the language of doctrinal intolerance. We are Kuffars - “People of the Book”, unbelievers. The headmaster’s children are bright, handsome and beautiful, and had trouble in the Catholic high school they attended, trouble that I doubt Arab Christians don’t face. Ms. Powell will understand this, and unlike James Clapper, or so many other native-born executives in whatever branch, have no illusions about the real importance of Sharia.

President Trump has made what could be another brilliant move. Islam, to survive, must undergo its reformation. The Saudi Royal Family caught in protection scheme, much of it about money, and confusing to most for whom the program hasn’t been written, but whose authoritative voices are either confused, or intentionally confusing. We didn’t get the influence peddler Hillary, who told her daughter about the terrorist attack on Benghazi and several days later told the mother of one of the former Seals, who gave up his life because Hillary would not allow cross-border support, that she promised to prosecute the filmmaker who produced and directed the little video, corny but largely factual, about the life of Muhammed. We wouldn’t have known the truth but for Julian Assange, much as our intelligence agencies would like keep their perfidy secret from our public and Congress, even while, thanks to Hillary and Podesta, any 3rd-rate hacker who bought an exploit to Yahoo email or Gmail on the DarkNet, could be reading compartmented secret email communications. And virtually all our friends and enemies most certainly read those emails long ago.

Clearing the Swamp is not easy, and efforts to undermine the fumigation will certainly be attacked. The solution is education. Finding true experts won’t be easy, but starting with our Constitution and history, “From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli” demonstrates that Jefferson, Madison, and Washington were quite familiar with the Bargary Pirates, who quoted the same Quran using the same phrases as they do today, in Fresno or Paris, or Tel Aviv or ...

My fault for my dangling statement but leaving out John Brennan’s name, the Muslim CIA Director, who is working with Clapper, who did get approved by our ignorant Senators, who no longer had the benefit of experts like Sephen Coughlin, purged by Obama and his Muslim Brotherhood associates in Executive Agencies.

Jane, perhaps you recall the exact statement Clapper made while being interviewed for Dir of National Intelligence? It was not a surprise given Obama’s history, but something like “The Muslim Brotherhood is a largely peaceful and increasingly secular organization”, both lies or betraying remarkable ignorance. Larry Johnson claims that the covert war to undermine Trump was being led by “largely peaceful” CIA Director, a Wahhabi Muslim who converted in Riyadh in the mid 90s, and had been rejected as Dir. of Nat. Security. These guys assume they can lie, as Hillary did, and probably have access to information that will prevent the revelation of any otherwise felonious behavior.

So true Grampa Dave. You too must sometime have read 18 U.S. Code 793, and probably wondered, as did I, why the subcommittee investigating Hillary’s email server crimes let Comey reinterpret U.S. code to required “intent”. They count on our ignorance. The FBI Director has no authority to reinterpret U.S. Code. Why did Chaffetz and Gowdy let that obvious violation slither by? Separation of powers is little understood by too many, but the FBI and Justice Departments are Executive agencies. They have the authority to “Execute” constitutional laws, not to make or change law.

McCain has been a tool for decades, and Democrats know it so well that Obama and Clair McCaskill tried twice in 2008 to insure, by co-sponsoring two Senate acts, one a bill Senate Bill 2678, Feb 2008, The Children of Military Citizens Natural Born Citizen Act, and when that failed, again the same sponsors except that Obama was just a co-sponsor with his campaign co-chair, McCaskill, a primary sponsor, the “Senator John S. McCain is a Natural Born Citizen Resolution”.

Obama, Larry Tribe (Obama and Cruz’ con-law professor), McCaskill, Cruz, Rubio, Haley and many others, along with regular readers of the NYT, WaPo, LATimes and Democrat law school professors knew McCain’s birth in non-U.S.-sovereign (until 1937) territory was problem, solvable by a Supreme Court Case, but still a problem. Both also knew that birth to a non-citizen parent was only a problem for presidential candidates, so Obama was careful never to claim natural born citizenship. Both parties supported it because Republican muckity mucks didn’t dare undermine their principal candidate. A “resolution” is not actionable and the law, SB2678, didn’t pass, but couldn’t have reinterpreted Minor v. Happersett without a Supreme Court case.

Not surprising that no serving politician nor media pundit dared to address CIA Director Brennan’s conversion to Islam in the mid-90s. He wasn’t the only one, but no observant Muslim can deny the Qur’an’s principle edict, Jihad is the unquestioned obligation of every believer to convert or kill unbelievers. If one didn’t accept the lessor known FBI Islamic specialists, Admiral James Lyons, retired Commander of the Pacific Fleet with a dozen other titles including creating the intelligence group within the Navy Seals owes no one and has made Brennan’s background perfectly clear. The CIA was well aware. according to unattributed operatives, who must have also converted or they would not have observed Brennan’s conversion in Riyadh. It may be why Obama couldn’t make Brennan Director of National Intelligence (not unlike Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter white, Harry Hopkins, John Service, all among hundreds of KGB employees during FDR and Truman presidencies).

Hillary and Podesta didn’t understand that printing State’s most secret communications through a Yahoo or Gmail account is like publishing a newsletter full of their email messages. Even amateur malware players can buy exploits of all sorts of common application services, including Gmail, Yahoo, Android, on the dark net. Assange is just a collator of messages for and from amateurs. WikiLeaks knows too well not to become beholden to any national government. He does a service by exposing sloppiness which the professionals almost certainly already have collected.

Hillary, according to FBI-published email, had her Philippine housekeeper, who had no security clearance, access Hillary’s personal account provide Hillary with the paper copies. The housekeeper sent the email to her, the housekeeper’s Yahoo account because she had trouble printing directly from the email client (probably due to account protections in Outlook or Outlook express).

Podesta was warned that his gmail or Yahoo account had been compromised, but didn’t bother to change his password, which I vaguely recall was “password”. McCain didn’t acquire the NSA intercepts himself. After many decades of fraud, even preceding the Keating Five scandal which cost taxpayers 124 billion and probably preceding the Navy lives cost when the Admiral’s son crashed his fighter while landing on an aircraft carrier, a job he probably only qualified for as the son of a respected Navy Admiral.

McCain is 80 years old. He is probably as ignorant of messaging protocols as Hillary, Podesta, and probably Weiner, Abedin, and other’s using intelligence for political purposes. He was fed these leaks as part of a war with Trump’s team. McCain is cornered and will absorb a little bad press as he is protected by the press for the cause. The cause is primarily John McCain but also serves the interests of those who hold records of all his screw-ups, most of which are criminal. His screw-ups as a Navy Pilot, and his miserable performance at Annapolis are a matter of record.

Apparently Obama and his campaign co-chair Clair McCaskill and Senator Barack knew that Foreign Born Children of military citizens were not natural born when they sponsored Senate Bill 2678 in February of 2008, clearly attempting to legitimize the tool McCain. The Bill did not get out of the Senate - didn’t pass. McCain was born in 1936, a year before Congress passed the necessary act to render the Canal Zone U.S. Sovereignty. “To clarify the law and ensure that children born to United States citizens while serving overseas in the military are eligible to become President.”, Senate Bill 2678, February 17, 2008, which failed to pass, but would not have been submitted if it was redundant.

Professor Larry Tribe, Harvard, whom Elena Kagan saved from expulsion for plagiarization of a book he “authored”, made the definition clear in his latter to the Senate Judiciary Committee supporting Obama and McCaskill’s second attempt to make McCain seem eligible - Senate resolutions don’t make law and laws can’t interpret the Constitution. Larry repeated his understanding of the original interpretation in his op-ed in the Boston Globe explaining why Ted Cruz was a hypocrite for insisting that he was eligible - a natural born citizen - though born in Canada to an alien father. “Senator John McCain Natural Born Citizen Resolution”, April 30, 2008, Clair McCaskill sponsor with Obama as a co-sponsor

Tribe still values his reputation, having taught constitutional law to both Obama and Cruz. Larry is honest about believing in a living constitution. He and other “living Constitution” supporter believe that interpreting the dusty old Constitution is their prerogative. Both Tribe and Obama, are honest about regarding the Constitution as having mostly historical relevance. That, of course, means Obama lied when he took the oath administered by John Roberts. But Obama never called himself a natural born citizen. In fact his web site was clear “I am a native-born citizen of the U.S....”. Obama told us all he was born a “Subject of the British Commonwealth. A native-born citizen is not natural born citizen is not natural born, as clearly implied in the 14th Amendment, as tribal American Indians, “not taxed”, were not even made citizens.

If Minor v Happersett had not been treated as precedent, Perkins v. Elg, 1939, would have, since neither was dictum. In both cases the definition was essential to the decision. common-law interpretation, which was stated by 14th Amendment. John Bingham, Congressman and Jusdge, author of the citizenship paragraphs of the 14th Amendment, explained three times to Congress that being born to citizen parents on our soil was the never doubted definition of natural born citizen, and wasn’t addressed at all in the 14th Amendment.. Fortunately, unlike votes or digital copies of Supreme Court decisions offered as legitimate by Google partner Justia.com, the largest free web-based source of Supreme Court cases, which Justia.com edited during the Summer of 2008, and later corrected, the Congressional Record/Congressional Globe, is still available on paper and Justia’s Tim Stanley and his Soros-funded partner, Karl Malamud, who was CIO for Podesta’s Center for American Progress, couldn’t edit the 1866 Congressional Globe.

I too discovered Krisanne less than a year ago and have not heard such clear explications of the Constitution, usually in the words of framers and founders. A biochemist from a working class Democrat family who worked a Monsanto but decided to fight after 9/11, became SIGNINT Russian intelligence agent when Army Language School was oversubscribed for Arabic students. After being injured while working in Russian Intelligence she married another intelligence agent, went to law school and worked for ten years in Florida’s AG office as a prosecutor.

Want to learn what you didn’t know about what authorities the House, Senate, president, courts legally have? She teaches all ages gratis 200+ times each year, probably influenced by her husband who is a preacher. She has no fear of legislators to whom she often explains the law by citing law accurately and often quoting its framers. She has a daily radio program which has no equal, both at Krisannehall.com and on YouTube.com. Instead of bloviating like the self-anointed constitutional “experts” famous more for calling people dopes, a tactic which usually betrays ignorance. Krisanne explains Article 5 and cites historical provenance, always encouraging others to read the sources. She criticizes some whom I would have welcomed as my commander like Alan West because she is more concerned with liberty than defense. She would probably explain that without liberty what is there to defend! You or I might disagree, but you will understand her reasoning and that is a rare quality.

I am surprised that Obama/Clinton/Lerner have not gone after her as they did to Catherine Engelbrecht for investigating the joke of integrity of our voting protocols. Krisanne’s latest direction, which is only possible because of her excellent grasp of the constitutional law she realized only after mastering the law school curriculum wasn’t taught or even provided at her law school. Krisanne’s energy and curiosity betray a deeper understanding of law than you’ll hear in the lectures being provided by Harvard, Yale, Stanford, U of Virginia, ... Federal funding and big government have infected most law schools, and even Hillsdale, which avoided and still avoids the politically volatile issues, in spite of their claim to be independent because they don’t accept federal money.