Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $41,840
51%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 51%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: thisisnotscience

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Scientist Debunks Alkaline Water Lies

    06/02/2011 1:07:05 PM PDT · by truthnomatterwhat · 20 replies · 1+ views
    Ray Kurzweil is a world renown scientist who was curious enough to do research on the amazing benefits of alkaline water. He confirms everything healthalkaline.com says about ionized water. Read more about Kurzweil. Ray Kurzweil drinks 10 glasses of Alkaline Water a day and believes it will help him live a long and healthy life. In this Q and A he answers your questions about Alkaline Water based on his own research and knowledge. Question: I have read on the Internet that it is not possible to create alkaline or acid water from pure water and that water that is...
  • How James Carville’s New Book, "40 More Years" Misrepresents Intelligent Design (Typical Evo)

    07/23/2009 9:34:01 AM PDT · by GodGunsGuts · 18 replies · 642+ views
    Evolution News & Views ^ | July 22, 2009 | Casey Luskin
    How James Carville’s New Book, 40 More Years Misrepresents Intelligent Design In his new book, 40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation, Democratic strategist James Carville badly misrepresents intelligent design (ID) as a wholly negative argument against evolution. What’s most incredible is that Carville makes this inaccurate characterization directly after quoting passages from ID proponents making wholly positive arguments for design. One such passage he quotes is from our Intelligent Design Briefing Packet for Educators, as follows:Intelligent design “begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI).…One easily testable form of CSI...
  • A Theory of Biblical Creation

    02/08/2005 10:26:54 AM PST · by DannyTN · 153 replies · 3,418+ views
    trueorigins.com ^ | 2000 | Timothy Wallace
    Home | Feedback | Links | Books A Theory of Creation A Response to the Pretense that No Creation Theory Exists © 2000 Timothy Wallace.  All Rights Reserved.  [Last Modified:  14 October 2002] A popular practice among many proponents of evolutionism—including the “regulars” at the Talk.Origins newsgroup—is to claim that “no one has ever presented a scientific theory of creation to us,”[1] without which they find it “impossible to objectively evaluate the idea of creation.”  They then hasten to confirm this by “evaluating” the idea of creation—without objectivity!  Such an approach to the topic of origins shall be shown below...
  • Mayan 'apocalypse' crop circle appears at Silbury Hill

    07/11/2009 6:05:15 PM PDT · by dennisw · 54 replies · 3,660+ views
    telegraph ^ | 08 Jul 2009
    A 350ft crop circle of an ancient Mayan symbol, said to be a sign of an impending apocalypse, has appeared next to Silbury Hill in Wiltshire. The giant pattern - thought to represent a traditional Mayan head-dress - appeared next to the tallest prehistoric man-made mound in Europe last week. Members of the crop circle community believe the mystic symbol is a signal of the end of the 5,126-year Mayan 'Long Count' calendar on December 21, 2012. Karen Alexander, a crop circle enthusiast, said: "This is one of the most interesting crop circles I have ever seen. It is definitely...
  • DARWIN DEBUNKED BY SHOCKING DISCOVERY

    07/11/2009 9:58:05 AM PDT · by Tamar Rush · 173 replies · 3,484+ views
    No Compromise Media ^ | July 10th, 2009 | Dr. Paul L. Williams
    Foiled Forever by Fossil Finding Last January, Scientific American declared 2009 as “the year of Darwin” in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of the revolutionary evolutionist who turned man into a monkey. The celebration is understandable. No thinker has accomplished more to create a cleft between science and religion. No writer has done more to undermine the claim of scripture that man was made in the image and likeness of God. No scholar has forged greater support for moral relativity and modern materialism. His theories are treated as laws; his notions as knowledge; his speculation as science....