Dahlseide
Since Nov 6, 1998
| ||||||
|
|
It is my opinion (Dahlseide - Free Republic website) that the above Trilogy explains many decisions of our Supreme Court. It appears to me that the discovery of abortion as a right under a penumbra of our Constitution is result of a long line of dangerous precedents culminating, through the vehicle of a living constitution, in words meaning what the Supreme Court wants, or decides, them to mean.
Why? I have read a book entitled Principles of Confederacy that I believe explains our Founders original intent regarding the judiciary, and furthermore explains a dangerous precedent set by our first Supreme Court.
How so? Below you will find President & Judges, Chapter IX of Principles of Confederacy in which, in my opinion, you will find a precedent set, intentionally or not, by John Marshall in Madison v Marbury, that has resulted in; first, a living constitution and, second; followed as certainly as night follows day, by words mean what the Court wants them to mean.
Clearly I am not the author of Principles of Confederacy. Any comments that I make with reference to Principles of Confederacy are not to be construed in any way as supported by the author. I do however have permission from the author to post Chapter IX on the Free Republic website. The author is John Remington Graham a member of the Minnesota Bar. Chapter IX , titled President and Judges, is reproduced in its entirety below following credits and statement of copyrights.
link to: Chapter IX: President & Judges
"This monk," said Dr. Mallerstadt, the rector of the university, himself a man of great learning and fame, "will reform the whole Church. He builds on the prophets and apostles, which neither Scotist nor Thomist can overthrow." 6