[ChicagoConservative27]

Honig must have been watching the people court or something. Idiot.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

There may well be some embellishments…but I think it’s quite clear they had sex in 2006 in that hotel room.

...and? Having sex with a woman in a hotel room in 2006 is not a crime.

[MNnice]

Let me remind the readers that a NY appeals court overturned the Harvey Weinstein rape conviction because the prosecution presented irrelevant and salacious evidence that unduly influenced the jury. The whole day today was nothing but irrelevant and salacious evidence.

[high info voter]

And she got paid big as a prostitute!! ....imho

[Uncle Miltie]

Democrat far left DA, jury and judge.

[Vermont Lt]

I didn’t think the fact they had sex was even in doubt.

The defense could have stipulated that. I understand why they didn’t…but to suggest that fact was a big deal in this case is missing the entire point the prosecution is trying to make.

The prosecution just wants to talk about sex stuff. That’s pretty weak and sad.

[bantam]

I mean. OMG, OMG, OMG, Stormy Daniels HATES Trump!!!!
Hard hitting evidence right there!!!!!!!!!!!

[Leep]

Bill Clinton should be in jail!

[Nervous Tick]

I didn’t think Daniels’ cross examination had happened yet. Am I confused?

[1Old Pro]

The liberal judges and prosecutors have raped and screwed over our justice system - shameful.

[Red Badger]

She blew it...................

[Jane Long]

Love it, that RPOTUS went around the absurd gag order, and, after yesterday’s proceedings ... proceeded to read quotes from the LSM hacks.

Epic!!

[bray]

It got so bad the judge had to stop it since his witness was crashing and burning.

[butlerweave]

If Honig spins any faster he’ll create a black-hole

[bitt]

P

[MeanWestTexan]

He mainly talked about the direct exam. The “disaster” was during X.

[cdcdawg]

“There may well be some embellishments...”

That’s not good for Team CNN.

[chuckee]

This is a prosecution forum friendly NYC jury with a compromised NYC Democrat partisan judge who should have recused himself but, of course, did not. What has evidence and testimony got to do with their ultimate verdict? There are other forces at work here.

[VideoDoctor]

All the stories on Trump's trial written by LIBERAL LEFTISTS seem to convey a DESPERATE effort to impart guilt and show "ineffectiveness".

Trump is under "God's Hedge of Protection" and WILL, in the end, PREVAIL!

[bigbob]

So the headline should be. “Stormy’s responses to cross examination were disastrous”

[hcmama]

Did anyone read past the headline?

Honig is clearly saying that Stormy Daniels blew it under cross-examination, not the defense team