[bitt]

p

[rktman]

Oh, otay. Does that make o’bamski a victim then?

[Dalberg-Acton]

Improbable. They were after Trump.

[eyeamok]

Obstruction of Justice and Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, every person involved including the petulant marxist muslim can be Criminally Prosecuted for this when Trump is re-elected.

[Gay State Conservative]

It’s obvious that Kenya’s Favorite Son had something to hide. Maybe he was taking $$$ from Rocket Boy for favorable policies.

[Yo-Yo]

The rumor mill said that the FIB was after papers related to their Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the 2016 Trump Campaign.

It was the Obama FIB that initiated Crossfire Hurricane.

[SomeCallMeTim]

Ping

[Skywise]

I thought they were after the Ukrainian corruption evidence for Biden?

[enumerated]

I seriously doubt that is what the FBI was after.
I’d bet the ranch that President Trump collected evidence of illegal activities relating to Crossfire Hurricane, the stolen 2020 election, and the January 6 frame up operation.

The Democrats colluded with deep state bureaucrats to commit treason against a duly elected POTUS, and there is no doubt in my mind that, while in office, he gathered the evidence he needs to prove it when push comes to shove. He would have to be stupid not to do that - and he is far from stupid.

That’s what they are after - evidence that could put them in prison, or worse.

[OftheOhio]

And Eric Schmidt is now a citizen of Cyprus. (cough)https://www.businessinsider.com/eric-schmidt-google-cyprus-citizen-passport-for-sale-2020-11?op=1

[Sacajaweau]

We’ve been saying...what were they really looking for...since it happened.

[aspasia]

I do not like suspended interest.

[sauropod]

JS belongs in jail.

Corrupt!

[piasa]

Other sources said they were looking for docs relating to Iran.

[Jumper]

There is no way in hell the globalists can afford to allow the DNC or even a RINO to take office. They will all go to jail based on activities in office. Given the legal profolio of new tactics, the DNC will have to get an EO out making the DNC safe from law suits by people or DA’s. If Trump takes office, all these new methods of framing crime and creating it has been legalized and in Trumps hands he just might have to DEPORT 100,000 Democrats as a humane jesture lest they be charged as Traitors and hung.

[Gene Eric]

Diddy Cleaning Services

[paulcissa]

I call BS. They were after the “missing folder” on Crossfire Hurricane.

[Bob Ireland]

Julie Kelly, X, 9:24 AM · Apr 24, 2024

Judge Cannon is on an unsealing binge.

Unsealed records detail allegations that Jay Bratt, Jack Smith's lead
prosecutor in classified docs case, threatened Stanley Woodward--atty
for Walt Nauta--with sinking a judicial nomination if he didn't get his
client to flip on Trump:

     From its inception, this investigation has been tainted by prosecutorial misconduct. On
August 24,2022, attorney Stanley Woodward, who represents Waltine “Walt” Nauta, met with Jay
Bratt, one of the lead prosecutors in this matter, at the Department of Justice. This was the first
time that Mr. Woodward had ever met Mr. Bratt. Upon Mr. Woodward’s arrival at Main Justice, he
was led to a conference room where Mr. Bratt awaited with what appeared to be a folder containing
information about Mr. Woodward. Mr. Bratt thereupon told Mr. Woodward he didn’t consider him
to be a “Trump lawyer,” and he further said that he was aware that Mr. Woodward had been
recommended to President Biden for an appointment to the Superior Court of the District of
Columbia. Mr. Bratt followed up with words to the effect of “I wouldn’t want you to do anything
to mess that up.” Thereafter, Mr. Bratt advised Mr. Woodward that “one way or the other” his
client, Wall Nauta, would be giving up his lavish lifestyle of “private planes and golf clubs” and
he encouraged Mr. Woodward to persuade Mr. Nauta to cooperate with the government’s
investigation (this was prior to the appointment of the Special Counsel).

     Mr. Woodward has long been an extremely professional and upstanding officer of the
Court. Mr. Bratt’s statement suggested a quid pro quo or even a threat intended to cause Mr.
Woodward to persuade his client to cooperate with Mr. Bratt. In other words, “play ball or you
have no chance of becoming a judge.” Under such circumstances, it is appropriate for the Court to
ease the secrecy protections typically afforded by Rule 6(e) so that it may determine if similar
egregious behavior has made its way into this unprecedented investigation, particularly regarding
the testimony of Mr. Nauta.

[Taxman]

I hope President Trump has copies safely locked away!